warum kann man bei den üblichen KI Chatbots nur bestimmte Dateiendungen hochladen?
was wird besser wenn ich eine cpp datei in txt umbenenne oder gar als pdf exportiere (was übrigens scite schön kann...)?
was wird besser wenn ich eine cpp datei in txt umbenenne oder gar als pdf exportiere (was übrigens scite schön kann...)?
September 27, 2026 at 9:37 PM
warum kann man bei den üblichen KI Chatbots nur bestimmte Dateiendungen hochladen?
was wird besser wenn ich eine cpp datei in txt umbenenne oder gar als pdf exportiere (was übrigens scite schön kann...)?
was wird besser wenn ich eine cpp datei in txt umbenenne oder gar als pdf exportiere (was übrigens scite schön kann...)?
Amusing. Apparently I'm just mildly interesting to corporate AI.
And I refuse on principle to try to manipulate any academic performance metrics. We don't use any of these metrics for promotion or tenure at the U of Chicago, we read our colleague's papers.
And I refuse on principle to try to manipulate any academic performance metrics. We don't use any of these metrics for promotion or tenure at the U of Chicago, we read our colleague's papers.
September 26, 2026 at 12:31 AM
Amusing. Apparently I'm just mildly interesting to corporate AI.
And I refuse on principle to try to manipulate any academic performance metrics. We don't use any of these metrics for promotion or tenure at the U of Chicago, we read our colleague's papers.
And I refuse on principle to try to manipulate any academic performance metrics. We don't use any of these metrics for promotion or tenure at the U of Chicago, we read our colleague's papers.
Seo Lighthouse ƿæs grēat ac Nosferatu ƿæs scite
September 23, 2026 at 8:46 AM
Seo Lighthouse ƿæs grēat ac Nosferatu ƿæs scite
チャット用だと plus から pro に上げるより scite 追加する方が良い度が上がりげ
September 20, 2026 at 8:39 AM
チャット用だと plus から pro に上げるより scite 追加する方が良い度が上がりげ
Company News: #Scite MCP Adds Citation Graph Tool scite.ai/blog/citatio...
#GenAI #Libraries #scholcomm
#GenAI #Libraries #scholcomm
Citation Surfing with Scite MCP
Scite's MCP server now includes a new citation_graph tool that lets AI agents explore how papers are connected through citations.
scite.ai
September 9, 2026 at 2:43 PM
Company News: #Scite MCP Adds Citation Graph Tool scite.ai/blog/citatio...
#GenAI #Libraries #scholcomm
#GenAI #Libraries #scholcomm
“次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」国内提供開始 AIで論文の引用を分析・評価” htn.to/48HhqXPoF7
次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」国内提供開始 AIで論文の引用を分析・評価
ジー・サーチは、米国のSciteが提供する次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」の日本市場での取り扱いを9月4日に開始した。
htn.to
September 8, 2026 at 9:42 PM
“次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」国内提供開始 AIで論文の引用を分析・評価” htn.to/48HhqXPoF7
次世代AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本に上陸！引用文脈を可視化して研究を加速#AI#Scite#リサーチ支援
AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場での提供を開始。引用の文脈を可視化し、研究・開発を効率化、より信頼性の高い選択を可能にします。
AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場での提供を開始。引用の文脈を可視化し、研究・開発を効率化、より信頼性の高い選択を可能にします。
次世代AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本に上陸！引用文脈を可視化して研究を加速
AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場での提供を開始。引用の文脈を可視化し、研究・開発を効率化、より信頼性の高い選択を可能にします。
kanagawa.publishing.3rd-in.co.jp
September 4, 2026 at 2:17 AM
次世代AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」日本市場に登場#AIリサーチ#ジー・サーチ#Scite
株式会社ジー・サーチが提供する次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場で利用可能に。信頼性の高い研究開発を支援します。
株式会社ジー・サーチが提供する次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場で利用可能に。信頼性の高い研究開発を支援します。
次世代AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」日本市場に登場
株式会社ジー・サーチが提供する次世代型AIリサーチ支援サービス「Scite」が日本市場で利用可能に。信頼性の高い研究開発を支援します。
news.3rd-in.co.jp
September 4, 2026 at 2:03 AM
ih eopryou kwnow i fidsagereewtih toyu often but akso think youre aone of te best accounts on tis scite!
August 31, 2026 at 1:19 AM
ih eopryou kwnow i fidsagereewtih toyu often but akso think youre aone of te best accounts on tis scite!
Feels—to me as a medium informed person on this—like we've entered the MCP Wars in terms of AI-powered literature searching tools.
Consensus, Scite, Elicit, Undermind maybe kind of admitting that folks are primarily using their tools as "connectors/plugins" in the frontier models? I dunno.
Consensus, Scite, Elicit, Undermind maybe kind of admitting that folks are primarily using their tools as "connectors/plugins" in the frontier models? I dunno.
August 26, 2026 at 10:43 PM
Feels—to me as a medium informed person on this—like we've entered the MCP Wars in terms of AI-powered literature searching tools.
Consensus, Scite, Elicit, Undermind maybe kind of admitting that folks are primarily using their tools as "connectors/plugins" in the frontier models? I dunno.
Consensus, Scite, Elicit, Undermind maybe kind of admitting that folks are primarily using their tools as "connectors/plugins" in the frontier models? I dunno.
3/6
Elicitは文献からEvidenceを整理し、Sciteは引用が主張を支持・反証しているかまで見ます。
GoogleのAI co-scientistやFutureHouse Robinは、さらに仮説生成や実験設計へ進み始めています。
Elicitは文献からEvidenceを整理し、Sciteは引用が主張を支持・反証しているかまで見ます。
GoogleのAI co-scientistやFutureHouse Robinは、さらに仮説生成や実験設計へ進み始めています。
August 26, 2026 at 3:21 PM
3/6
Elicitは文献からEvidenceを整理し、Sciteは引用が主張を支持・反証しているかまで見ます。
GoogleのAI co-scientistやFutureHouse Robinは、さらに仮説生成や実験設計へ進み始めています。
Elicitは文献からEvidenceを整理し、Sciteは引用が主張を支持・反証しているかまで見ます。
GoogleのAI co-scientistやFutureHouse Robinは、さらに仮説生成や実験設計へ進み始めています。
Not every AI tool is built for scientific research. 🔬
Consensus, Elicit, ResearchRabbit, scite, and Perplexity offer different ways to find papers, map research trends, synthesize findings, and evaluate citations.
We review them in #PhotonicsFocus: https://bit.ly/4cFPjh4
Consensus, Elicit, ResearchRabbit, scite, and Perplexity offer different ways to find papers, map research trends, synthesize findings, and evaluate citations.
We review them in #PhotonicsFocus: https://bit.ly/4cFPjh4
August 22, 2026 at 8:42 AM
Not every AI tool is built for scientific research. 🔬
Consensus, Elicit, ResearchRabbit, scite, and Perplexity offer different ways to find papers, map research trends, synthesize findings, and evaluate citations.
We review them in #PhotonicsFocus: https://bit.ly/4cFPjh4
Consensus, Elicit, ResearchRabbit, scite, and Perplexity offer different ways to find papers, map research trends, synthesize findings, and evaluate citations.
We review them in #PhotonicsFocus: https://bit.ly/4cFPjh4
There's "divide tools into different functions & pick one tool in each and combine". Eg. We need a tool for citation chasing (pick research rabbit), one which has citation sentiment classification (pick scite), one that does "semantic search", one that does agentic (pick undermind) etc /5
August 15, 2026 at 10:08 AM
There's "divide tools into different functions & pick one tool in each and combine". Eg. We need a tool for citation chasing (pick research rabbit), one which has citation sentiment classification (pick scite), one that does "semantic search", one that does agentic (pick undermind) etc /5
I think that this timeline too optimistic if you are not a fan of LLMs. I would be shocked if a majority of nonfiction works that are being written right now did not have at least one LLM powered search as a part of the research process. Whether it is the big LLMs or specialized stuff like Scite.
Within 10 years, you will be unable to find a new nonfiction book for which the author did not ask an LLM to conduct semantic search on piles of primary and secondary materials
August 10, 2026 at 8:40 PM
I think that this timeline too optimistic if you are not a fan of LLMs. I would be shocked if a majority of nonfiction works that are being written right now did not have at least one LLM powered search as a part of the research process. Whether it is the big LLMs or specialized stuff like Scite.
If I'm getting this right, the "unsubscribe" and "manage preferences" links in this email from #scite only work if the email (web) app loads some JavaScript.
Are these people crazy?!
Are these people crazy?!
August 9, 2026 at 11:48 PM
If I'm getting this right, the "unsubscribe" and "manage preferences" links in this email from #scite only work if the email (web) app loads some JavaScript.
Are these people crazy?!
Are these people crazy?!
Main difference Undermind mcp has over Consensus, scite mcp is that it gives you the ability to act on the Undermind workspace/project (think reference manager+ search reports + reports). The MCP of the other two are basically just gives you one off searches i think
August 1, 2026 at 2:14 AM
Main difference Undermind mcp has over Consensus, scite mcp is that it gives you the ability to act on the Undermind workspace/project (think reference manager+ search reports + reports). The MCP of the other two are basically just gives you one off searches i think
Inteligencias artificiales para metodología de la investigación : ChatGPT, Elicit, reserch rabbit Consensus, Scite AI
#ia #chagpt #metodologiadelainvestigacion #InteligenciaArtificial
#ia #chagpt #metodologiadelainvestigacion #InteligenciaArtificial
July 29, 2026 at 11:54 AM
Inteligencias artificiales para metodología de la investigación : ChatGPT, Elicit, reserch rabbit Consensus, Scite AI
#ia #chagpt #metodologiadelainvestigacion #InteligenciaArtificial
#ia #chagpt #metodologiadelainvestigacion #InteligenciaArtificial
Forget prompt engineering for research.
Use AI to synthesize findings.
Ask Elicit or Scite to find papers supporting/contradicting a claim, or to generate research briefs, not just summaries.
That's how real insights are built.
Use AI to synthesize findings.
Ask Elicit or Scite to find papers supporting/contradicting a claim, or to generate research briefs, not just summaries.
That's how real insights are built.
July 23, 2026 at 10:00 PM
Forget prompt engineering for research.
Use AI to synthesize findings.
Ask Elicit or Scite to find papers supporting/contradicting a claim, or to generate research briefs, not just summaries.
That's how real insights are built.
Use AI to synthesize findings.
Ask Elicit or Scite to find papers supporting/contradicting a claim, or to generate research briefs, not just summaries.
That's how real insights are built.