#section122
We’re moving from one phase of illegal, erratic trade policy — to a new phase of illegal, erratic trade policy.

@nationalreview.bsky.social #Section122
www.nationalreview.com/corner/trump...
February 22, 2026 at 2:29 PM
“.. The administration itself has argued that this provision was not meant for the kind of tariffs Mr. Trump wants to impose.”

@nytimes.com #Section122
www.nytimes.com/2026/02/24/u...
February 24, 2026 at 7:31 PM
February 22, 2026 at 2:45 PM
金曜RTH上げた理由が関税の最高裁判決だったわけで

月曜営業日はトランプのsection122発言で環境が変わった中で上値追うのはなって感じだった
February 23, 2026 at 10:27 PM
🇺🇸 15% global tariff after Supreme Court ruling.
📈 Small business importer costs tripled.
💸 Households pay $570–$600 more.
#Tariffs2026 #Section122 #BusinessImpact #HouseholdCosts
#Tariffs2026 #Section122 #BusinessImpact #HouseholdCosts
View in Timelines
March 27, 2026 at 2:01 PM
“In that press conference #Trump announced that he would immediately use another little-known legal route — #Section122 — to impose immediate 10 percent #tariffs across the board.” open.substack.com/pub/paulkrug...
IEEPA! IEEPA! IEEPA!
Why the tariff ruling really matters
open.substack.com
February 20, 2026 at 9:07 PM
Alan Wm. Wolff (my fellow #FMG Board member) has written a sharp piece tracing why US tariff power has always sat with Congress, not the president. Well worth the read as the #Section122/301 story continues to unfold.
www.piie.com/blogs/realti...
Why the Founding Fathers did not give the president the power to impose tariffs
There is no inherent presidential tariff power. That is solely the prerogative of the Congress. This has been true since the country was founded 250 years ago. The president has only what the Congress...
www.piie.com
July 7, 2026 at 10:02 PM
FWIW, legality of #section122 #tariffs hinges on the definition of “balance-of-payments deficits”. current usage of that term, incl. in Trump’s declaration, differs from 1974 when the law was passed; “BoP deficits” was about reserves, not individual trade imbalances. Basis for legal challenges?
February 21, 2026 at 11:13 PM
BREAKING
#Trump presser re: #SCOTUS ruling today most of Trump's second-term #tariffs are illegal: (talking) Says in response to the SCOTUS ruling, he'll sign"an order to impose a 10% global #tariff under #Section122 over and above our normal tariffs already being charged."

#Economy
February 20, 2026 at 6:52 PM
1. 🚨 #NytOmTrump den #told, som #DonaldTrump indførte på 10 % i 150 dage (& som han sagde skulle være 15 %) er #LetitiaJames, statsanklager (DA) #NewYork 100 % sikker på at vinde sammen med de øvrige 22 demokratiske statsanklagere.❗

Han indførte
#eudk #section122 #Tariff
youtu.be/Sz67RapJInE?...
Trump’s NEW Tariff Scheme Gets CRUSHED in Open COURT
YouTube video by Legal AF
youtu.be
April 13, 2026 at 3:49 PM
U.S. to Enforce New Section 301 Tariffs on 60 Trading Partners as Administration Abandons USMCA Framework
#arizona #canada #donaldTrump #europeanUnion #fox&Friends #generalMotors #mexico #officeOfTheU.s.TradeRepresentative #section122 #section301 #toyota #tradeActOf1974 #usmca
#nile1
U.S. to Enforce New Section 301 Tariffs on 60 Trading Partners as Administration Abandons USMCA Framework
Speaking Tuesday on "Fox & Friends" ahead of the November midterm elections, President Donald Trump acknowledged that relying on Section 301 required a
nile1.com
July 28, 2026 at 5:57 PM
🌐 10% tariff on most imports, with exclusions.
🔩 Steel/aluminum: 50% globally, UK 25%.
💸 De minimis ended—low-value goods taxed.
⚖️ Tariff faces court challenges, still collected.
#USTariffs #Section122 #SteelAluminum #DeMinimis #TariffLaw
View in Timelines
August 1, 2026 at 2:00 PM
🌍 US 10% tariff on most imports (Section 122)
⚖️ Section 122 replaces struck-down tariffs
🗓️ Effective Feb–Jul 2026 unless extended
#USTariff #Section122 #TradeLaw #2026
View in Timelines
July 15, 2026 at 2:01 PM
After this ruling, the cleanest unilateral fallback is Section 122 (Trade Act ’74)—a narrow tool allowing tariffs up to 15% for up to 150 days to address balance‑of‑payments problems. ⏳📉
Sources: Bloomberg Law (options after ruling) | Bloomberg overview (pre‑decision)
#Section122 #TradeAct
February 20, 2026 at 5:49 PM
#NytOmTrump Handelsdomstol blokerer 10 % told for 2 virksomheder & #Washington delstaten.

Resten er ikke dækket, da de ikke har sagsøgt. 24 Demokratiske statsanklagere får afvist deres medvirken, da de ikke som delstat har retsligt grundlag.

Trump administrationen vil anke.
#section122 #tariff
BREAKING: US trade court rules against Trump's 10% global tariff reut.rs/3QSFFjq
May 8, 2026 at 5:43 AM
NEW
#Trump issues stmt saying he's raising his new #Section122 global #tariff to 15% from the 10% he announced yesterday after #SCOTUS ruled most of his second-term #tariffs are illegal.

Section 122 tariffs can last for 150 days. Congress would need to approve extension beyond those 150 days.
February 21, 2026 at 5:25 PM
BREAKING
#Trump presser re: #SCOTUS ruling today most of Trump's second-term #tariffs are illegal: (taking Qs) Says he thinks the new #Section122 global 10% #tariff will start in 3 days.

#Economy
February 20, 2026 at 7:15 PM
paidprotester.substack.com/p/trump-lose...

It was a stunning blow to Donald Trump's ego. The Supreme Court merely reaffirmed the original judgment by the US International Court of Trade.

#Trump #tariffs #IEEPA #SupremeCourt #Section122 #USTR #Greer
Trump loses global tariffs case and swears a lot
The International Court of Trade was right in the first place. Trump shouldn't be surprised.
paidprotester.substack.com
February 20, 2026 at 8:36 PM
Tim Brightbill was quoted in the media on the significance of the CIT overturning the Trump Administration’s Section 122 tariffs.

See the full roundup of coverage here: https://bit.ly/48S1FAZ

#WileyWay #Tariffs #Trade #Section122
May 8, 2026 at 4:29 PM
SCOTUS case largely hinged on issues of law - did congress intended to delegate #tariff authority; with the definition of tariff pretty easy. Section122 is the opposite. Delegation clear, but definition of “BoP deficits” will be contended
February 23, 2026 at 12:21 AM