#statmodeling
Frank et al. (2023) find 248 papers on wildly different topics and data using the same ethics approval number and 39 on human subjects without any ethics approval, all from the same institute. Post-publication peer review is crucial! (via statmodeling: statmodeling.stat.columbia.edu/2023/08/22/e...)
Raising concerns on questionable ethics approvals – a case study of 456 trials from the Institut H...
Background The practice of clinical research is strictly regulated by law. During submission and review processes, compliance of such research with the laws enforced in the country where it was conduc...
researchintegrityjournal.biomedcentral.com
August 22, 2023 at 8:56 AM
This passage in the statmodeling article above, is like, wow
April 10, 2026 at 2:23 PM
Excited to see plans to implement Lambert w function in Stan. We used it to estimate time to events (canopy closure during reforestation:. Useful function!

x.com/StatModeling/s… esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.100…
When does seed limitation matter for scaling up reforestation from patches to landscapes?
Restoring forest to hundreds of millions of hectares of degraded land has become a centerpiece of international plans to sequester carbon and conserve biodiversity. Forest landscape restoration will ...
esajournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com
December 19, 2024 at 6:21 PM
"Theory is scalable, simulation is not. That's the theory of theory" new motto from stats guru, Andrew Gelman, @StatModeling
December 19, 2024 at 5:48 PM
This long list of very smart people is a main reason why I am switching from #BUGS to #STAN

x.com/StatModeling/s…
December 19, 2024 at 5:41 PM
Thought-provoking and important post on #statistics from #Bayesian guru Andrew Gelman @StatModeling:

andrewgelman.com/2015/06/20/sta…
Statistics Be
This modern statistics got me confused, To tell you friends I’m quite unenthused. This modern statistics got me confused, To tell you friends I’m quite unenthused.
t.co
December 19, 2024 at 5:39 PM
YES PLEASE, @StatModeling. Applied regression and multilevel modeling books using Stan

andrewgelman.com/2015/06/11/app…
Applied regression and multilevel modeling books using Stan
Are there any plans in the works to update your book with Prof. Hill on hierarchical models to a new edition with example code in Stan?
t.co
December 19, 2024 at 5:39 PM
.@StatModeling buying Bayesian Data Analysis 3 based on @WilsonCattle's review: "Concise and powerful....more readable than its predecessor"
December 19, 2024 at 5:32 PM
Inspired by recent @StatModeling post discussing visual evidence & dfference-in-differences design, I went back to see what I did in my own DiD papers.

Usually try to have a figure tell the story in most of them, though could certainly improve. Here are some pictures.

1/.
December 2, 2024 at 4:31 AM
Interesting point from @StatModeling: Why I prefer 50% rather than 95% intervals http://andrewgelman.com/2016/11/05/why-i-prefer-50-to-95-intervals/
November 25, 2024 at 8:40 AM
Related to my last post, anyone have anything like predictInterval in merTools for just straight lm and glm objects so you can get simulations? I mean, I can whip something up using the arm package from @StatModeling, but would be nice if its in a package... #rstats
November 23, 2024 at 4:58 PM
@VinayPrasadMD @BrianNosek @bengoldacre @hmkyale @StatModeling @sTeamTraen @amitabhchandra2 @deaneckles @economeager @f2harrell @minzlicht @thosjleeper @RFisman @LizDDay @WAWilsonIV @_MiguelHernan @mandl @jflier @juliaoftoronto
You might like this:...
I was going to write up a response to this PNAS piece: Redish et al., “Reproducibility failures are essential to scientific inquiry.” <a href="http://www.pnas.org/content/115/20/5042" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://www.pnas.org/content/115/20/5042
November 8, 2024 at 3:23 AM
You funded these clinical trials, but you'll never know what they found - http://wpo.st/1inz0 @StatModeling
December 5, 2024 at 10:17 PM
How to fix the #pvalues problem - @nature asks @jtleek @david_colquhoun @StatModeling @MicheleNuijten @goodmanmetrics & Blakeley McShane https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-017-07522-z?WT.ec_id=NEWSDAILY-20171128&utm_source=briefing&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20171128
Five ways to fix statistics
As debate rumbles on about how and how much poor statisti...
www.nature.com
December 5, 2024 at 6:56 PM
About that bogus claim that North Carolina is no longer a democracy . . . @StatModeling http://andrewgelman.com/2017/01/02/about-that-bogus-claim-that-north-carolina-is-no-longer-a-democracy/#.WGqWJdrSWz8.twitter
December 4, 2024 at 7:01 PM
i side with @StatModeling on this. can't see why steven pinker is so surprised that most academics don't write well <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2014/12/08/steven-pinker-writing-agree-disagree/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://andrewgelman.com/2014/12/08/steven-pinker-writing-agree-disagree/ …
November 1, 2024 at 7:50 PM
"the problem with peer review is with the peers." <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/01/peer-review-make-no-damn-sense/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://andrewgelman.com/2016/02/01/peer-review-make-no-damn-sense/ great insights on the peer review process by @StatModeling
November 1, 2024 at 10:12 AM
Hmmm I expected more from this post given the title but it’s very short. Given the above, I cannot disagree with this title ofc.
https://x.com/statmodeling/status/1106907748510433280?s=21
x.com
x.com
November 1, 2024 at 1:41 AM
CNN on Scotland vote: No 52%, Yes 58%. @StatModeling sees a bigger lesson here on the perils of statistics by hand http://andrewgelman.com/2014/09/19/never-happened-r-markdown/
November 23, 2024 at 7:49 AM
A short but devastating history of the statistical crisis in psychology, by @StatModeling <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2016/09/21/what-has-happened-down-here-is-the-winds-have-changed/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://andrewgelman.com/2016/09/21/what-has-happened-down-here-is-the-winds-have-changed/
November 19, 2024 at 3:07 PM
November 14, 2024 at 12:07 PM
.@RichardTol keeps repeating "it doesn't matter". Rapidly losing credibility. See comments of here: <a href="http://andrewgelman.com/2014/05/27/whole-fleet-gremlins-looking-carefully-richard-tols-twice-corrected-paper-economic-effects-climate-change/" class="hover:underline text-blue-600 dark:text-sky-400 no-card-link" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-link="bsky">http://andrewgelman.com/2014/05/27/whole-fleet-gremlins-looking-carefully-richard-tols-twice-corrected-paper-economic-effects-climate-change/ @StatModeling
November 3, 2024 at 2:05 PM
@ingorohlfing @StatModeling Important first comment though: spuriousness comes in different amounts.
November 17, 2024 at 7:38 PM
“Lancet papers are inappropriately taken more seriously than they should”. @StatModeling about #PACE-controversy https://goo.gl/97BW
x.com
goo.gl
January 6, 2016 at 7:59 AM
Mr. @StatModeling makes my young researcher/political heart. #BadScience makes #BadPolicies https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/monkey-cage/wp/2015/09/09/when-good-governments-or-any-governments-base-policies-on-bad-research/
March 15, 2016 at 8:43 AM