C has cutting-edge ergos like returning structs by value, ok!!
since C99, you can even use compound literals to return anonymous structs from a function
since C99, you can even use compound literals to return anonymous structs from a function
November 7, 2026 at 3:05 PM
C has cutting-edge ergos like returning structs by value, ok!!
since C99, you can even use compound literals to return anonymous structs from a function
since C99, you can even use compound literals to return anonymous structs from a function
was lying in bed trying to sleep and images of uint32_t and structs kept flashing in my eyes like the exorcist
November 8, 2026 at 1:41 PM
was lying in bed trying to sleep and images of uint32_t and structs kept flashing in my eyes like the exorcist
Sharing objects between workers changes the problem that serialization normally solves.
https://structs.arv.tools/
https://structs.arv.tools/
Structs Docs
The TC39 structs proposal for JavaScript today: structs, shared structs, SharedArray, Atomics.Mutex and Atomics.Condition, with a compiler for their syntax.
structs.arv.tools
November 7, 2026 at 10:49 AM
Sharing objects between workers changes the problem that serialization normally solves.
https://structs.arv.tools/
https://structs.arv.tools/
So... no structs in GDScript? 🤨
November 5, 2026 at 7:56 PM
So... no structs in GDScript? 🤨
見てる: "arv/structs: The TC39 structs proposal for JavaScript today: structs, shared structs, SharedArray, Atomics.Mutex and Atomics.Condition, with a compiler for their syntax" https://github.com/arv/structs/tree/main
November 9, 2026 at 12:18 AM
見てる: "arv/structs: The TC39 structs proposal for JavaScript today: structs, shared structs, SharedArray, Atomics.Mutex and Atomics.Condition, with a compiler for their syntax" https://github.com/arv/structs/tree/main
Passing Structs with a Rust NIF in Elixir
#ElixirLang #rust
www.yellowduck.be
November 10, 2026 at 6:05 PM
If you are feeling weird you can declare all your structs as single element arrays and only use ->
;-)
;-)
November 7, 2026 at 11:33 PM
If you are feeling weird you can declare all your structs as single element arrays and only use ->
;-)
;-)
Challenge 2 & 3 went smoothly! My notes helped with flashes of recall. Thank you, past me.
Lessons from today's #coding practice:
1. set up structs and extensions outside of ContentView
2. It is ok to reference your notes
3. extensions are not scary
#indiedev #solodev #learntocode #iOSdev #swiftUI
Lessons from today's #coding practice:
1. set up structs and extensions outside of ContentView
2. It is ok to reference your notes
3. extensions are not scary
#indiedev #solodev #learntocode #iOSdev #swiftUI
November 9, 2026 at 9:00 PM
"warning: ISO C forbids comparison of ‘void *’ with function pointer"
"warning: ISO C99 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro"
"warning: ISO C99 doesn’t support unnamed structs/unions"
pelo amor de deus
"warning: ISO C99 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro"
"warning: ISO C99 doesn’t support unnamed structs/unions"
pelo amor de deus
November 8, 2026 at 4:40 AM
"warning: ISO C forbids comparison of ‘void *’ with function pointer"
"warning: ISO C99 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro"
"warning: ISO C99 doesn’t support unnamed structs/unions"
pelo amor de deus
"warning: ISO C99 requires at least one argument for the "..." in a variadic macro"
"warning: ISO C99 doesn’t support unnamed structs/unions"
pelo amor de deus
Nobody NEEDS structs (or unions), but I miss em whenever they're gone.
November 5, 2026 at 8:04 PM
Nobody NEEDS structs (or unions), but I miss em whenever they're gone.
pbwire_elixir 0.1.15 [updated]
Elixir wrapper over the pbwire NIF: elixir-protobuf structs, C-core wire speed
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Elixir wrapper over the pbwire NIF: elixir-protobuf structs, C-core wire speed
Licenses: Apache-2.0
November 10, 2026 at 2:00 AM
pbwire_elixir 0.1.15 [updated]
Elixir wrapper over the pbwire NIF: elixir-protobuf structs, C-core wire speed
Licenses: Apache-2.0
Elixir wrapper over the pbwire NIF: elixir-protobuf structs, C-core wire speed
Licenses: Apache-2.0
does anyone know a good method to deduplicate DWARF type info (because structs get re-encoded per compilation-unit) that takes a trust-but-verify approach (they could indeed differ) to matching by type name (unreliable, anonymous namespaces exist, etc.)
November 8, 2026 at 3:36 PM
does anyone know a good method to deduplicate DWARF type info (because structs get re-encoded per compilation-unit) that takes a trust-but-verify approach (they could indeed differ) to matching by type name (unreliable, anonymous namespaces exist, etc.)
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 8, 2026 at 3:30 AM
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 8, 2026 at 3:45 AM
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 8, 2026 at 3:15 AM
typedstruct 0.6.3 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
typedstruct 0.6.2 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 7, 2026 at 12:45 PM
typedstruct 0.6.2 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
typedstruct 0.6.2 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 7, 2026 at 1:15 PM
typedstruct 0.6.2 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
is there a sane way to do sparse ctypes structs that doesn't involve dummy padding bullshit
November 7, 2026 at 8:37 AM
is there a sane way to do sparse ctypes structs that doesn't involve dummy padding bullshit
typedstruct 0.6.1 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 7, 2026 at 6:00 AM
typedstruct 0.6.1 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
typedstruct 0.6.0 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
November 7, 2026 at 4:45 AM
typedstruct 0.6.0 [updated]
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
A library for defining structs and records with automatic type inference.
Licenses: MIT
I mean if you're using a stock engine, often the problem isn't "I want X*Y" but "how do I do X*Y within this engine" and that's where you start to lose your sanity because everything is ultra-abstracted in structs-on-top-of-classes with tight encapsulation while all you want is that bool to be false
November 10, 2026 at 7:38 PM
I mean if you're using a stock engine, often the problem isn't "I want X*Y" but "how do I do X*Y within this engine" and that's where you start to lose your sanity because everything is ultra-abstracted in structs-on-top-of-classes with tight encapsulation while all you want is that bool to be false