It's because far too many of his statements are unfalsifiable.
October 1, 2026 at 3:21 PM
It's because far too many of his statements are unfalsifiable.
“Male loneliness” is a vague, empirically unfalsifiable Potemkin village of an argument meant to smuggle yet more anti feminism into popular consensus.
September 25, 2025 at 5:17 PM
“Male loneliness” is a vague, empirically unfalsifiable Potemkin village of an argument meant to smuggle yet more anti feminism into popular consensus.
We now understand that most religious statements are unfalsifiable: that is, there is nothing that could happen that would demonstrate that they were false.
There is therefore no logical thing to be gained by arguing with someone who believes unfalsifiable statements.
There is therefore no logical thing to be gained by arguing with someone who believes unfalsifiable statements.
October 1, 2026 at 3:34 PM
We now understand that most religious statements are unfalsifiable: that is, there is nothing that could happen that would demonstrate that they were false.
There is therefore no logical thing to be gained by arguing with someone who believes unfalsifiable statements.
There is therefore no logical thing to be gained by arguing with someone who believes unfalsifiable statements.
It's not possible to disprove unfalsifiable statements, so people refusing to engage in that are just acting rationally.
October 1, 2026 at 3:27 PM
It's not possible to disprove unfalsifiable statements, so people refusing to engage in that are just acting rationally.
one last thing is i think the "trump is winning" conclusion that a lot of you have come to is essentially unfalsifiable.
October 20, 2024 at 8:29 PM
one last thing is i think the "trump is winning" conclusion that a lot of you have come to is essentially unfalsifiable.
This is why I just hate these debates because they’re unfalsifiable!
September 18, 2025 at 1:27 AM
This is why I just hate these debates because they’re unfalsifiable!
your view is basically unfalsifiable
August 7, 2023 at 3:11 PM
your view is basically unfalsifiable
the best thing about biden dropping out and harris taking a massive lead is that my belief that biden would have won is now essentially unfalsifiable
August 8, 2024 at 5:47 AM
the best thing about biden dropping out and harris taking a massive lead is that my belief that biden would have won is now essentially unfalsifiable
"unfalsifiable ideology"
uh-oh, someone's been reading second-hand accounts of karl popper on twitter.
uh-oh, someone's been reading second-hand accounts of karl popper on twitter.
de transzorg in Nederland bestaat een halve eeuw, er wordt al net zo lang geroepen dat er any minute een hausse aan spijtoptanten zal opstaan ook al zijn de tevredenheidsscores 99%
May 17, 2025 at 7:38 AM
"unfalsifiable ideology"
uh-oh, someone's been reading second-hand accounts of karl popper on twitter.
uh-oh, someone's been reading second-hand accounts of karl popper on twitter.
I would like to add that this is not only horsecrap but completely unfalsifiable, and therefore a useless standard.
December 9, 2025 at 2:57 PM
I would like to add that this is not only horsecrap but completely unfalsifiable, and therefore a useless standard.
Many people are saying substack.com/home/post/p-...
August 14, 2026 at 2:21 PM
Many people are saying substack.com/home/post/p-...
Unfalsifiable thesis: Harris would've won if she called Trump "this motherfucker" at the debate
November 19, 2024 at 7:39 PM
Unfalsifiable thesis: Harris would've won if she called Trump "this motherfucker" at the debate
a statement that is unfalsifiable since 2008
March 27, 2025 at 1:07 AM
a statement that is unfalsifiable since 2008
It's literally unfalsifiable. It's pure pseudoscience but they get to do it because they're white men who get taken seriously by default.
July 5, 2025 at 4:25 PM
It's literally unfalsifiable. It's pure pseudoscience but they get to do it because they're white men who get taken seriously by default.
unfalsifiable future - fundraising excuse
April 3, 2026 at 7:35 PM
unfalsifiable future - fundraising excuse
"Crime" is perpetual and unfalsifiable. It's the perfect issue because it happens every day and will *always* happen every day. 4/
September 8, 2025 at 4:58 PM
"Crime" is perpetual and unfalsifiable. It's the perfect issue because it happens every day and will *always* happen every day. 4/
"Rotating villain" is largely unsupported, unfalsifiable, and in most cases serves as a way to blame 212 people for the actions of 1
Classic use of rotating villains, and this should be the epitaph for Golden’s career. Pathetic and shameful work by every single R, and by Dems too. If it hadn’t been Golden it would have been MGP or someone else.
Republicans just once again killed a War Powers Resolution to end Trump's reckless and criminal war in Iran.
Maine Dem Jared Golden was sole Dem no vote & Ohio GOP Rep Warren Davidson switched from previously supporting a WPR to voting "present" to help save Trump and Johnson from losing the vote
Maine Dem Jared Golden was sole Dem no vote & Ohio GOP Rep Warren Davidson switched from previously supporting a WPR to voting "present" to help save Trump and Johnson from losing the vote
April 16, 2026 at 4:31 PM
"Rotating villain" is largely unsupported, unfalsifiable, and in most cases serves as a way to blame 212 people for the actions of 1
this is an unfalsifiable claim and no amount of contrary evidence would ever convince you otherwise
February 13, 2026 at 2:03 PM
this is an unfalsifiable claim and no amount of contrary evidence would ever convince you otherwise
That kind of 'analysis', though, requires looking backward to history and context rather than forward into empty, unfalsifiable predictions. It requires ascertaining basic facts and standing behind them. It requires *work*.
July 25, 2025 at 4:28 PM
That kind of 'analysis', though, requires looking backward to history and context rather than forward into empty, unfalsifiable predictions. It requires ascertaining basic facts and standing behind them. It requires *work*.
this is of course unfalsifiable because the condition "there are no liberal democrats" is unachievable, because of the legitimately held beliefs of urban electorates.
November 4, 2025 at 5:18 PM
this is of course unfalsifiable because the condition "there are no liberal democrats" is unachievable, because of the legitimately held beliefs of urban electorates.
That Oswald killed Kennedy, acting alone, is comprehensively proven beyond all reasonable a doubt, well beyond most historical facts we'd never question. The conspiracy theories did do a lot of real harm, but belief in them is essentially unfalsifiable. It wasn't a failure of the investigation.
November 22, 2025 at 10:41 PM
That Oswald killed Kennedy, acting alone, is comprehensively proven beyond all reasonable a doubt, well beyond most historical facts we'd never question. The conspiracy theories did do a lot of real harm, but belief in them is essentially unfalsifiable. It wasn't a failure of the investigation.
They love coming up with unfalsifiable ideas and then conflating them with truths
March 7, 2026 at 6:43 PM
They love coming up with unfalsifiable ideas and then conflating them with truths
Is Marxism unfalsifiable or is it wrong?
bsky.app/profile/davi...
bsky.app/profile/davi...
I was for bernie in 2015, but marxists have been wrong since, well, Marx wrote all his wrong bullshit.
April 25, 2025 at 9:38 PM
Is Marxism unfalsifiable or is it wrong?
bsky.app/profile/davi...
bsky.app/profile/davi...
Shifting the bar.
No longer is violent crime, which can at least be backed up by facts, the barometer. Instead, it’s an unfalsifiable sense of “disorder”
No longer is violent crime, which can at least be backed up by facts, the barometer. Instead, it’s an unfalsifiable sense of “disorder”
September 9, 2026 at 2:10 PM
Shifting the bar.
No longer is violent crime, which can at least be backed up by facts, the barometer. Instead, it’s an unfalsifiable sense of “disorder”
No longer is violent crime, which can at least be backed up by facts, the barometer. Instead, it’s an unfalsifiable sense of “disorder”
That literally is how we treat unfalsifiable statements: to ignore and/or laugh at the ones that we think are weird.
If someone believes the rapture will come at some point (any point in the future), we don't have to "disprove" it or make "counterarguments."
If someone believes the rapture will come at some point (any point in the future), we don't have to "disprove" it or make "counterarguments."
October 1, 2026 at 3:25 PM
That literally is how we treat unfalsifiable statements: to ignore and/or laugh at the ones that we think are weird.
If someone believes the rapture will come at some point (any point in the future), we don't have to "disprove" it or make "counterarguments."
If someone believes the rapture will come at some point (any point in the future), we don't have to "disprove" it or make "counterarguments."