The One Nation leader was a guest on the podcast of controversial far-right UK figure Tommy Robinson, where she lamented the end of the White Australia policy.

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton has dropped his vow to change the national school curriculum, after comments earlier in the campaign that students should be able to think freely without being "indoctri...

Sameer was marked as an ideal candidate for permanent residency and passed all his health checks - then th...

Ouroboros by Lindy Lee, based on the ancient tale about a snake swallowing its own tail, was commissioned by the National Gallery of Australia to celebrate its 40th birthday — and its $14 million pric...

YouTube video by ABC News (Australia)

The story of Irene Law, an Australian-born woman of Chinese ancestry, reveals how the White Australia policy restricted the rights and movement of non-European Australians. Born Lucy Maud Lem Cue in South Wangaratta, Victoria, in 1900, Irene was the daughter of a Chinese father and a New Zealand-born mother of British ancestry. After her father's death, she was adopted by a Chinese-European family and raised in Melbourne. At 18, Irene travelled to Hong Kong with her adoptive father. When she returned to Australia in 1921, she obtained a Certificate Exemption from Dictation Test (CEDT), a document that enabled eligible non-European residents to leave Australia temporarily and return without being subjected to the country's discriminatory dictation test. Although Irene had been born in Australia and was legally a British subject by birth, her Chinese appearance and ancestry meant she could still be affected by immigration restrictions. The dictation test was introduced under the Immigration Restriction Act 1901 and allowed immigration officers to require people seeking entry to write a passage dictated in a prescribed European language. After 1905, officers could select a language the person did not understand, making exclusion easier. According to the National Archives of Australia, the test was administered 1,359 times before 1909, with only 52 people admitted, and no migrants required to sit it passed after 1909. Irene's family knew little about these difficulties until after her death. Her grandson Steven Law says discovering her archived records brought both a stronger connection to his heritage and anger that an Australian-born woman needed official documentation to return to her own country. Artist Peter Drew's 'Aussie' poster series, which uses archival photographs of people who received such exemptions, has brought these stories into public view. The works highlight the contradiction between Australia's exclusionary past and the diverse national identity that exists today. The dictation test was abolished in 1958, while the remaining elements of the White Australia policy were dismantled by 1973. The story continues to resonate with Australians of Chinese and other migrant backgrounds, while raising broader questions about who has historically been allowed to belong.

The article explores the revival of discussions around the White Australia policy's legacy in contemporary Australian immigration debates. Political figures like Pauline Hanson and One Nation leader Barnaby Joyce have reignited conversations about the policy's historical impact, despite its formal abolition in 1975. Experts argue that reviving aspects of the policy would be politically and legally challenging in modern Australia, which has embraced multiculturalism. The piece highlights Hanson's controversial remarks about migration issues stemming from the policy's dismantling, while also noting her denial of supporting it. It examines the broader political tensions, including calls for a 'values test' in immigration and concerns about cultural integration. Demographers and historians emphasize Australia's shift toward inclusivity, questioning whether the nation is still grappling with its colonial past. The article underscores the complexity of balancing national identity with multiculturalism, while critiquing attempts to revive discriminatory policies under the guise of 'Australian values'.