Spain court upholds voting suspension

Reposted by José Antonio Noguera, Ismael Peña‐López

Scholar power: 6.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 José Antonio Noguera	10%	14	3.7%
🎓 Ismael Peña‐López	8%	9	2.4%
Total			6.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

60.0%

5.3 h

430

6.1%

Ranking score

0.126

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Roger Senserrich

@4freedoms.es

El Supremo decidiendo por sus cojones que una ley aprobada por el parlamento no es legal porque no se fían de su implementación es de locos.

EL PAÍS @elpais.com · 8h

🔴 El Supremo mantiene para el 29-N la suspensión del derecho al voto de los nacionalizados por la ‘ley de nietos’

El Supremo mantiene para el 29-N la suspensión del derecho al voto de los nacionalizados por la ‘ley de nietos’

El alto tribunal rechaza el recurso de la Abogacía del Estado, que pedía que se levantara la medida y cifra en 163.020 personas el número de afectados

elpais.com

October 12, 2026 at 5:26 PM

Reposted by Lupicínio Íñiguez-Rueda

3%

Scholar power: 3.4%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Lupicínio Íñiguez-Rueda	8%	18	3.4%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

7.6 h

1017

3.4%

Ranking score

0.071

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Reposted by Francisco Javier

4%

Scholar power: 4.7%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Francisco Javier	13%	13	4.7%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

68.0%

8.4 h

192

4.7%

Ranking score

0.062

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Ana Pardo de Vera P.

@pardodevera.bsky.social

Ya sabemos qué votan, militan y ‘hacen’ los jueces del Tribunal #Supremo

Nada nuevo contra la #democracia ⚖️

#29N
#elecciones2026

www.publico.es/politica/tri...

El Supremo impide votar el 29N a los españoles nacionalizados con la 'ley de nietos'

El Gobierno lamenta la decisión del Alto Tribunal y, en palabras de Grande-Marlaska, asegura que "parece que el derecho al voto no es tan relevante para algunos"....

www.publico.es

October 12, 2026 at 2:20 PM

Reposted by Lina Gálvez‐Muñoz

4%

Scholar power: 4.1%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Lina Gálvez‐Muñoz	11%	14	4.1%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

63.0%

6.9 h

52

4.1%

Ranking score

0.054

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

by José Antonio Noguera

11%

Scholar power: 11.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 José Antonio Noguera	10%	14	11.2%

Formula for scholar power: 3 × author's field match × √author's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

56.0%

5.0 h

2

11.2%

Ranking score

0.04

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

José Antonio Noguera

@josenoguerauab.bsky.social

¿Por qué hay que acatar una decisión de este Supremo en contra del derecho al voto establecido en la Constitución?

October 12, 2026 at 5:46 PM

Reposted by Jesús Rodríguez Pomeda

1%

Scholar power: 1.3%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Jesús Rodríguez Pomeda	4%	11	1.3%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

68.0%

6.6 h

82

1.3%

Ranking score

0.023

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Manuel Rivas

@manuelrivas.bsky.social

Trás la decisión sectaria del Supremo español, negando el derecho al voto a miles de ciudadanos españoles, "nietos de exiliados", no pueden considerarse justas las elecciones del 29-N. Este tribunal es el brazo jurídico de la derecha neofranquista. Los "nietos" no son untermenchen (infrahumanos)!

October 12, 2026 at 4:05 PM

Reposted by Ramón López Facal

2%

Scholar power: 2.2%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Ramón López Facal	6%	14	2.2%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

57.0%

8.5 h

151

2.2%

Ranking score

0.016

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Xan López

@xanlopez.net

Leeré con muchísima atención los programas de los diferentes partidos políticos sobre la cuestión de una reforma integral del poder judicial.

Diario Público @publico.es · 9h

🔴ÚLTIMA HORA | El Supremo mantiene la suspensión del derecho a voto de los nacionalizados por la 'ley de nietos'

El Supremo mantiene la suspensión del derecho a voto de los nacionalizados por la 'ley de nietos' para el 29N

El Tribunal Supremo mantiene la suspensión del derecho a voto de los nacionalizados por la ley de nietos para la convocatoria electoral del 29N.

diario.publico.es

October 12, 2026 at 2:11 PM

Reposted by Fabián Muniesa

2%

Scholar power: 2.9%

Story's scientific field profile

Law 55%, Political science 35%, Sociology 10%

Name	Field match	H-index	Scholar power
🎓 Fabián Muniesa	5%	34	2.9%

Formula for scholar power: sum of each reposter's field match × √reposter's h-index

Ranking score inputs

Relevance

Recency

Reposts

Scholar power

51.0%

8.6 h

13

2.9%

Ranking score

0.007

Formula for ranking score (post): scholar_power × max((total_reposts)^(1/3), 1) × (1 / max(hours_since_posted, 1)) × (raw_relevance)^3

Verfassungsblog

@verfassungsblog.de

Spain went from outrage over the eviction of an 87-year-old woman in Madrid to the calling of a general election.

MIRYAM RODRÍGUEZ-IZQUIERDO SERRANO explains why vulnerability is the key concept behind this shift.

verfassungsblog.de/vulnerabilit...