This case is not cert-worthy. This is a bad sign.
BREAKING: The Supreme Court agrees to take up a challenge to President Trump's January 20 birthright citizenship executive order.
The court will hear DOJ's appeal of a loss below in a class-action challenge brought in the wake of June's decision limiting universal injunctions.
The court will hear DOJ's appeal of a loss below in a class-action challenge brought in the wake of June's decision limiting universal injunctions.
December 5, 2025 at 7:12 PM
This case is not cert-worthy. This is a bad sign.
denial of cert is a statutory power
March 4, 2026 at 2:06 AM
denial of cert is a statutory power
The fact they even granted cert instead of immediately issuing a ruling striking down the EO shows how illegitimate this court has become.
January 30, 2026 at 4:26 PM
The fact they even granted cert instead of immediately issuing a ruling striking down the EO shows how illegitimate this court has become.
Proper insane. Firstly this won't stop trans women because lots of us have a correct birth cert. But also who the fuck knows where their birth cert is? Or wants to hand it over to use the toilet or changing room? Absolutely ridiculous. And for what?! To stop me swimming?
This is going to be an absolute car crash, the Supreme Court verdict looks more absurd by the day
www.thetimes.com/article/86fb...
www.thetimes.com/article/86fb...
May 20, 2025 at 3:13 PM
Proper insane. Firstly this won't stop trans women because lots of us have a correct birth cert. But also who the fuck knows where their birth cert is? Or wants to hand it over to use the toilet or changing room? Absolutely ridiculous. And for what?! To stop me swimming?
I’m shocked. I thought this was a banger of a cert petition.
October 15, 2024 at 7:09 PM
I’m shocked. I thought this was a banger of a cert petition.
This is bizarre framing.
SCOTUS “officially considering taking up a case” is just an incendiary way to say, “someone filed a cert petition in this case.”
The court “officially considers” every cert petition. Most of them are denied. 1/
SCOTUS “officially considering taking up a case” is just an incendiary way to say, “someone filed a cert petition in this case.”
The court “officially considers” every cert petition. Most of them are denied. 1/
Breaking: The Supreme Court is now officially considering taking up a case overturning same-sex marriage.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
October 23, 2025 at 4:01 PM
This is bizarre framing.
SCOTUS “officially considering taking up a case” is just an incendiary way to say, “someone filed a cert petition in this case.”
The court “officially considers” every cert petition. Most of them are denied. 1/
SCOTUS “officially considering taking up a case” is just an incendiary way to say, “someone filed a cert petition in this case.”
The court “officially considers” every cert petition. Most of them are denied. 1/
This is nearly 1:1 what Alex Jones is doing.
He was denied cert in the Supreme Court, which ends all appeal avenues for $1.35 billion in judgments, and is now delaying payout based on a second judgment he owes to a separate set of families.
All the same playbook to never pay victims.
He was denied cert in the Supreme Court, which ends all appeal avenues for $1.35 billion in judgments, and is now delaying payout based on a second judgment he owes to a separate set of families.
All the same playbook to never pay victims.
July 8, 2026 at 1:11 PM
This is nearly 1:1 what Alex Jones is doing.
He was denied cert in the Supreme Court, which ends all appeal avenues for $1.35 billion in judgments, and is now delaying payout based on a second judgment he owes to a separate set of families.
All the same playbook to never pay victims.
He was denied cert in the Supreme Court, which ends all appeal avenues for $1.35 billion in judgments, and is now delaying payout based on a second judgment he owes to a separate set of families.
All the same playbook to never pay victims.
Passed an exam today and picked up a cert. 😎
September 11, 2025 at 8:04 PM
Passed an exam today and picked up a cert. 😎
Yay! I passed my A+ cert!
October 22, 2025 at 8:09 PM
Yay! I passed my A+ cert!
Right so i got a birth cert that says F from a different country what you gon do
This is going to be an absolute car crash, the Supreme Court verdict looks more absurd by the day
www.thetimes.com/article/86fb...
www.thetimes.com/article/86fb...
May 20, 2025 at 4:37 PM
Right so i got a birth cert that says F from a different country what you gon do
#5albums70s4
Well this is a cert straight away, one of my favourite albums.
Well this is a cert straight away, one of my favourite albums.
March 2, 2025 at 9:16 PM
#5albums70s4
Well this is a cert straight away, one of my favourite albums.
Well this is a cert straight away, one of my favourite albums.
The traditionalists will complain, but this is exactly how you should write a petition for cert! 10/10 no notes.
January 3, 2024 at 10:26 PM
The traditionalists will complain, but this is exactly how you should write a petition for cert! 10/10 no notes.
Love to see Alito preening about the FDA and patient safety. Alito recused from cert on a drug injury case against Merck (he owned stock), then un-recused when cert was granted, then wrote a dissent that cut-and-pasted Merck's arguments for why FDA approval obliterates injured people's right to sue.
Here’s my full report at Law Dork: www.lawdork.com/p/justices-l...
Justices likely to keep medication abortion available on current terms
The argument that courts should overrule the FDA's mifepristone decisions faced a skeptical Supreme Court. But, the Comstock Act waits in the wings.
www.lawdork.com
March 26, 2024 at 11:36 PM
Love to see Alito preening about the FDA and patient safety. Alito recused from cert on a drug injury case against Merck (he owned stock), then un-recused when cert was granted, then wrote a dissent that cut-and-pasted Merck's arguments for why FDA approval obliterates injured people's right to sue.
Fuck they are dangling a 10k scholarship in front of me to do Cert IV.
November 13, 2024 at 5:13 AM
Fuck they are dangling a 10k scholarship in front of me to do Cert IV.
Per the filing, "minutes" after Trump posted this screed, his lawyers informed Carroll's counsel that he would ask SCOTUS to reconsider its cert denial.
— Even though there wasn't a single justice who noted a dissent.
— Even though there wasn't a single justice who noted a dissent.
July 1, 2026 at 2:05 AM
Per the filing, "minutes" after Trump posted this screed, his lawyers informed Carroll's counsel that he would ask SCOTUS to reconsider its cert denial.
— Even though there wasn't a single justice who noted a dissent.
— Even though there wasn't a single justice who noted a dissent.
I don’t think this gets cert and I think the framing I’ve seen on this does a disservice to people who are used to seeing “SCOTUS to consider” and words to that effect to describe SCOTUS granting cert, even if they don’t know what cert is
12 Aug 25 -- Supremes to consider petition by Kim Davis, former KY clerk jailed/fined for refusing licenses to gay couples, whether to overturn/narrow 2015 Obergefell v Hodges gay marriage decision. @rikiwilchins.bsky.social
Supreme Court formally asked to overturn landmark same-sex marriage ruling
10 years after the Supreme Court extended marriage rights to all same-sex couples, it will consider whether to take a case asking it to overturn the decision.
abcnews.go.com
August 12, 2025 at 9:28 AM
I don’t think this gets cert and I think the framing I’ve seen on this does a disservice to people who are used to seeing “SCOTUS to consider” and words to that effect to describe SCOTUS granting cert, even if they don’t know what cert is
This is a grossly misleading description of what's actually happening. They're deciding the cert petition. That happens in every single case anybody asks them to take. There are thousands of cert petitions they "officially consider," it is completely mundane and the vast majority are rejected.
Breaking: The Supreme Court is now officially considering taking up a case overturning same-sex marriage.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
This is the first time in history the court has considered rolling back this right.
October 24, 2025 at 2:07 AM
This is a grossly misleading description of what's actually happening. They're deciding the cert petition. That happens in every single case anybody asks them to take. There are thousands of cert petitions they "officially consider," it is completely mundane and the vast majority are rejected.
Good news! The Supreme Court (after rescheduling it 10 times!) denies cert in Littlejohn. Parents of a middle school student sought cert., arguing that their substantive due process parental rights were not sufficiently respected when their child requested to use a different name and pronouns.
www.supremecourt.gov
April 27, 2026 at 1:53 PM
Good news! The Supreme Court (after rescheduling it 10 times!) denies cert in Littlejohn. Parents of a middle school student sought cert., arguing that their substantive due process parental rights were not sufficiently respected when their child requested to use a different name and pronouns.
Some things in life are a dead cert.
February 1, 2025 at 1:06 PM
Some things in life are a dead cert.
imagine a Cert showing this video to George S Patton
GO IT AGAIN GENERAL GRANT
April 11, 2025 at 3:47 AM
imagine a Cert showing this video to George S Patton
If they don't reject the bill they should be legally required to pay the expense of obtaining the required documents. In my state-
Driver's license/State ID. $72
Birth cert.-$25
Marriage cert-$72
Divorce cert-$25 + $5/page
So for a married woman the base cost- $169
This is voter suppression.
Driver's license/State ID. $72
Birth cert.-$25
Marriage cert-$72
Divorce cert-$25 + $5/page
So for a married woman the base cost- $169
This is voter suppression.
April 10, 2025 at 4:36 PM
If they don't reject the bill they should be legally required to pay the expense of obtaining the required documents. In my state-
Driver's license/State ID. $72
Birth cert.-$25
Marriage cert-$72
Divorce cert-$25 + $5/page
So for a married woman the base cost- $169
This is voter suppression.
Driver's license/State ID. $72
Birth cert.-$25
Marriage cert-$72
Divorce cert-$25 + $5/page
So for a married woman the base cost- $169
This is voter suppression.
For 40 years, Community Emergency Response Team volunteers have carried the torch of preparedness. Together, we continue to light the way toward stronger, more resilient communities. Our agency is proud to be part of that legacy. Learn more mil.wa.gov/cert
#NationalCERTWeek
#NationalCERTWeek
September 23, 2026 at 4:06 PM
For 40 years, Community Emergency Response Team volunteers have carried the torch of preparedness. Together, we continue to light the way toward stronger, more resilient communities. Our agency is proud to be part of that legacy. Learn more mil.wa.gov/cert
#NationalCERTWeek
#NationalCERTWeek