WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump is scheduled to deliver a nationally televised primetime address Thursday night that he says will

The foundation's priorities map out the conservative movement's wish list.

Advocates say online access would give disabled voters the opportunity to vote privately and independently.

The article reports escalating internal conflict within House Republicans over efforts to attach the SAVE Act to must-pass legislation. Rep. Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL) has warned she will block House floor proceedings unless House Speaker Mike Johnson includes the SAVE Act in a key legislative package. The SAVE Act would require stricter voter identification and citizenship verification standards while also imposing additional restrictions on mail-in voting. Luna has been advocating for the bill to be incorporated into the annual defense policy measure, arguing that Republicans should pursue multiple strategies to advance their election-related priorities. She told Punchbowl News, “We should be doing all of the above. Why not try? It’s crazy,” reflecting her frustration with leadership resistance. Luna has already disrupted GOP leadership plans by helping defeat a procedural rule that would have inserted SAVE Act language directly into the defense bill. Republican leadership has long sought to keep unrelated policy amendments out of defense legislation, maintaining a tradition of limiting the scope of such bills to ensure smoother passage. Her actions have therefore intensified tensions within the party over legislative strategy and priorities. Meanwhile, divisions are also emerging among Senate Republicans. Sen. Ron Johnson cautioned that Republicans must be careful with their messaging around the standoff, emphasizing that Democrats—not Republicans—are responsible for blocking the SAVE Act’s passage. He urged party members to frame the issue in a way that highlights Democratic opposition rather than internal GOP conflict. Overall, the dispute underscores ongoing fractures within the Republican Party over election policy tactics and legislative procedure as the midterm cycle approaches.

Senators decline to mandate even-year elections after school districts express strong opposition.

Read the full story at No Spin Media.

During a heated Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee hearing, Postmaster General David Steiner faced sharp questioning over a controversial proposed rule involving mail-in ballots and state voter rolls. Senator Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) challenged Steiner on whether the U.S. Postal Service could be used in a way that might influence election outcomes, particularly under pressure from political actors. The discussion centered on a proposal that would allow USPS to potentially refuse or delay mail-in ballots from states that do not provide voter registration data or voter rolls to the federal agency. Steiner acknowledged during the hearing that the Postal Service had put forward the proposed rule and confirmed his support for it. He also insisted that the agency routinely delivers mail-in ballots and that its day-to-day operations already include handling such election materials. However, critics at the hearing argued that the proposal could transform the Postal Service into a de facto election administration body, raising concerns about federal overreach into state-controlled election systems. Senator Slotkin accused the Trump administration of using postal policy as part of a broader strategy to question or influence the legitimacy of elections, warning that the Postal Service could be turned into a political tool. Her remarks reflected broader Democratic concerns, echoed in a letter signed by all 47 Senate Democrats, which claimed the proposed rule could disenfranchise voters. The issue has also triggered legal action, with 23 state attorneys general filing lawsuits to block related executive actions. Meanwhile, the proposed rule remains open for public comment until July 2, leaving its future uncertain as debate intensifies over the role of USPS in election processes and the limits of federal authority. The hearing highlighted deep partisan divisions over election security, voter access, and the independence of federal institutions, particularly the Postal Service’s role in handling mail-in ballots.