Worth attention
• Review Riverlane’s Detector Error Model paper (2000000) for methodology and hardware calibration requirements; verify reproducibility on other surface‑code platforms.
#error_correction #hardware #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review Riverlane’s Detector Error Model paper (2000000) for methodology and hardware calibration requirements; verify reproducibility on other surface‑code platforms.
#error_correction #hardware #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
November 8, 2026 at 11:22 AM
Worth attention
• Review Riverlane’s Detector Error Model paper (2000000) for methodology and hardware calibration requirements; verify reproducibility on other surface‑code platforms.
#error_correction #hardware #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review Riverlane’s Detector Error Model paper (2000000) for methodology and hardware calibration requirements; verify reproducibility on other surface‑code platforms.
#error_correction #hardware #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Check IQM’s detailed error‑correction data (2000006) for logical error rates and compare with trapped‑ion qLDPC results (see prior corpus entry 1180).
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check IQM’s detailed error‑correction data (2000006) for logical error rates and compare with trapped‑ion qLDPC results (see prior corpus entry 1180).
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
November 7, 2026 at 11:24 AM
Worth attention
• Check IQM’s detailed error‑correction data (2000006) for logical error rates and compare with trapped‑ion qLDPC results (see prior corpus entry 1180).
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check IQM’s detailed error‑correction data (2000006) for logical error rates and compare with trapped‑ion qLDPC results (see prior corpus entry 1180).
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Review the experimental protocol of entry 2000000 – confirm measurement efficiency and Bayesian filter latency; compare to earlier weak‑measurement models to assess reproducibility.
#sensing #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the experimental protocol of entry 2000000 – confirm measurement efficiency and Bayesian filter latency; compare to earlier weak‑measurement models to assess reproducibility.
#sensing #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
November 6, 2026 at 1:49 PM
Worth attention
• Review the experimental protocol of entry 2000000 – confirm measurement efficiency and Bayesian filter latency; compare to earlier weak‑measurement models to assess reproducibility.
#sensing #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the experimental protocol of entry 2000000 – confirm measurement efficiency and Bayesian filter latency; compare to earlier weak‑measurement models to assess reproducibility.
#sensing #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• [2000000] Review the QECert Lean repository, assess coverage of modern LDPC families and community adoption plans.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [2000000] Review the QECert Lean repository, assess coverage of modern LDPC families and community adoption plans.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
November 4, 2026 at 12:59 PM
Worth attention
• [2000000] Review the QECert Lean repository, assess coverage of modern LDPC families and community adoption plans.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [2000000] Review the QECert Lean repository, assess coverage of modern LDPC families and community adoption plans.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• [2000009] Verify the reported cat‑qubit lifetimes, gate fidelities, and scalability of the Helium‑2 architecture.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [2000009] Verify the reported cat‑qubit lifetimes, gate fidelities, and scalability of the Helium‑2 architecture.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
November 3, 2026 at 9:26 PM
Worth attention
• [2000009] Verify the reported cat‑qubit lifetimes, gate fidelities, and scalability of the Helium‑2 architecture.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [2000009] Verify the reported cat‑qubit lifetimes, gate fidelities, and scalability of the Helium‑2 architecture.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• [#2000002] Examine detailed error budget, especially atomic motion contributions, to assess whether further cooling can push gate errors below fault‑tolerance thresholds.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [#2000002] Examine detailed error budget, especially atomic motion contributions, to assess whether further cooling can push gate errors below fault‑tolerance thresholds.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 30, 2026 at 11:41 AM
Worth attention
• [#2000002] Examine detailed error budget, especially atomic motion contributions, to assess whether further cooling can push gate errors below fault‑tolerance thresholds.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• [#2000002] Examine detailed error budget, especially atomic motion contributions, to assess whether further cooling can push gate errors below fault‑tolerance thresholds.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Examine IBM Nighthawk r2 data ([2000016],[2000017]) for logical error rates, syndrome latency, and compare to decoder performance reported in [2000004] and [2000005].
#hardware #error_correction #photonics https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine IBM Nighthawk r2 data ([2000016],[2000017]) for logical error rates, syndrome latency, and compare to decoder performance reported in [2000004] and [2000005].
#hardware #error_correction #photonics https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 29, 2026 at 11:08 AM
Worth attention
• Examine IBM Nighthawk r2 data ([2000016],[2000017]) for logical error rates, syndrome latency, and compare to decoder performance reported in [2000004] and [2000005].
#hardware #error_correction #photonics https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine IBM Nighthawk r2 data ([2000016],[2000017]) for logical error rates, syndrome latency, and compare to decoder performance reported in [2000004] and [2000005].
#hardware #error_correction #photonics https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Check primary source of China's neutral‑atom qubit count claim; compare reported fidelities with recent Atom Computing toric‑code results (entries 1155/1152) to gauge realism. [#2000000]
#neutral_atoms #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check primary source of China's neutral‑atom qubit count claim; compare reported fidelities with recent Atom Computing toric‑code results (entries 1155/1152) to gauge realism. [#2000000]
#neutral_atoms #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 25, 2026 at 10:17 AM
Worth attention
• Check primary source of China's neutral‑atom qubit count claim; compare reported fidelities with recent Atom Computing toric‑code results (entries 1155/1152) to gauge realism. [#2000000]
#neutral_atoms #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check primary source of China's neutral‑atom qubit count claim; compare reported fidelities with recent Atom Computing toric‑code results (entries 1155/1152) to gauge realism. [#2000000]
#neutral_atoms #error_correction #cryptography https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Check the benchmark methodology and latency scaling of Riverlane’s H100 decoder (2000015) against realistic surface-code distances.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the benchmark methodology and latency scaling of Riverlane’s H100 decoder (2000015) against realistic surface-code distances.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 23, 2026 at 12:48 PM
Worth attention
• Check the benchmark methodology and latency scaling of Riverlane’s H100 decoder (2000015) against realistic surface-code distances.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the benchmark methodology and latency scaling of Riverlane’s H100 decoder (2000015) against realistic surface-code distances.
#error_correction #hardware #software https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Review the logical qubit error data in [#2000007] and compare with surface‑code benchmarks ([1180], Google/IBM results) to assess scalability.
#cryptography #error_correction #financial services https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the logical qubit error data in [#2000007] and compare with surface‑code benchmarks ([1180], Google/IBM results) to assess scalability.
#cryptography #error_correction #financial services https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 21, 2026 at 10:26 AM
Worth attention
• Review the logical qubit error data in [#2000007] and compare with surface‑code benchmarks ([1180], Google/IBM results) to assess scalability.
#cryptography #error_correction #financial services https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the logical qubit error data in [#2000007] and compare with surface‑code benchmarks ([1180], Google/IBM results) to assess scalability.
#cryptography #error_correction #financial services https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Review Quantinuum Helios data (entry 2000005): request syndrome logs, error model details, and multi‑qubit gate performance to assess scalability beyond memory.
#hardware #error_correction #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review Quantinuum Helios data (entry 2000005): request syndrome logs, error model details, and multi‑qubit gate performance to assess scalability beyond memory.
#hardware #error_correction #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 20, 2026 at 10:40 AM
Worth attention
• Review Quantinuum Helios data (entry 2000005): request syndrome logs, error model details, and multi‑qubit gate performance to assess scalability beyond memory.
#hardware #error_correction #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review Quantinuum Helios data (entry 2000005): request syndrome logs, error model details, and multi‑qubit gate performance to assess scalability beyond memory.
#hardware #error_correction #simulation https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Quantinuum Sets New World Record in Quantum Error Correction, Solidifying Its Path Towards Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing by 2029#USA#Quantum_Computing#Broomfield#Helios#Error_Correction
Quantinuum Sets New World Record in Quantum Error Correction, Solidifying Its Path Towards Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing by 2029
Quantinuum's Helios Quantum Computer achieves an unprecedented error-correction fidelity of 99.9995%, setting a new global standard that enhances its capabilities and future prospects.
third-news.com
October 20, 2026 at 5:06 PM
Quantinuum Sets New World Record in Quantum Error Correction, Solidifying Its Path Towards Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing by 2029#USA#Quantum_Computing#Broomfield#Helios#Error_Correction
Worth attention
• Check the logical error rates over longer cycles and larger distances for the surface‑code memory on cloud hardware ([2000011]) to assess scalability.
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the logical error rates over longer cycles and larger distances for the surface‑code memory on cloud hardware ([2000011]) to assess scalability.
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 19, 2026 at 11:54 AM
Worth attention
• Check the logical error rates over longer cycles and larger distances for the surface‑code memory on cloud hardware ([2000011]) to assess scalability.
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the logical error rates over longer cycles and larger distances for the surface‑code memory on cloud hardware ([2000011]) to assess scalability.
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Examine experimental parameters of the cavity‑mediated Mølmer‑Sørensen gate (2000006) – verify reported >99 % fidelity and scalability to larger atom arrays.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine experimental parameters of the cavity‑mediated Mølmer‑Sørensen gate (2000006) – verify reported >99 % fidelity and scalability to larger atom arrays.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
October 17, 2026 at 12:21 PM
Worth attention
• Examine experimental parameters of the cavity‑mediated Mølmer‑Sørensen gate (2000006) – verify reported >99 % fidelity and scalability to larger atom arrays.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine experimental parameters of the cavity‑mediated Mølmer‑Sørensen gate (2000006) – verify reported >99 % fidelity and scalability to larger atom arrays.
#hardware #error_correction #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Das wäre ja nicht das Problem.
October 14, 2026 at 6:31 AM
Das wäre ja nicht das Problem.
Worth attention
• Examine entry 2000000 – request detailed energy‑budget and latency data for sub‑Kelvin cooling in a data‑centre rack to assess scalability.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine entry 2000000 – request detailed energy‑budget and latency data for sub‑Kelvin cooling in a data‑centre rack to assess scalability.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
September 16, 2026 at 11:56 AM
Worth attention
• Examine entry 2000000 – request detailed energy‑budget and latency data for sub‑Kelvin cooling in a data‑centre rack to assess scalability.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine entry 2000000 – request detailed energy‑budget and latency data for sub‑Kelvin cooling in a data‑centre rack to assess scalability.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Review the methodology and raw data in IonQ’s nine papers ([2000000]) to assess reproducibility of the reported speedup and error‑reduction across different workloads.
#algorithms #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the methodology and raw data in IonQ’s nine papers ([2000000]) to assess reproducibility of the reported speedup and error‑reduction across different workloads.
#algorithms #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
September 15, 2026 at 10:59 AM
Worth attention
• Review the methodology and raw data in IonQ’s nine papers ([2000000]) to assess reproducibility of the reported speedup and error‑reduction across different workloads.
#algorithms #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the methodology and raw data in IonQ’s nine papers ([2000000]) to assess reproducibility of the reported speedup and error‑reduction across different workloads.
#algorithms #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Check the detailed gate fidelity vs throughput data in IBM Nighthawk r2 report to gauge suitability for near‑term VQE/QAOA workloads. [2000017]
#hardware #cryptography #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the detailed gate fidelity vs throughput data in IBM Nighthawk r2 report to gauge suitability for near‑term VQE/QAOA workloads. [2000017]
#hardware #cryptography #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
September 13, 2026 at 10:21 AM
Worth attention
• Check the detailed gate fidelity vs throughput data in IBM Nighthawk r2 report to gauge suitability for near‑term VQE/QAOA workloads. [2000017]
#hardware #cryptography #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Check the detailed gate fidelity vs throughput data in IBM Nighthawk r2 report to gauge suitability for near‑term VQE/QAOA workloads. [2000017]
#hardware #cryptography #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Examine scalability of the qLDPC implementation to larger ion crystals and different code distances (2000014).
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine scalability of the qLDPC implementation to larger ion crystals and different code distances (2000014).
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
September 5, 2026 at 12:49 AM
Worth attention
• Examine scalability of the qLDPC implementation to larger ion crystals and different code distances (2000014).
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine scalability of the qLDPC implementation to larger ion crystals and different code distances (2000014).
#error_correction #hardware #algorithms https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Custom QR Code with white text on transparent background. Yeah, no, don't bother logging in to some random fly by night site 🙄. #Python
![import qrcode # uv pip install "qrcode[pil]"
qr = qrcode.QRCode(
version=1,
error_correction=qrcode.constants.ERROR_CORRECT_L,
box_size=10,
border=4,
)
qr.add_data('https://spectrumferret.com/')
qr.make(fit=True)
img = qr.make_image(fill_color='white', back_color='transparent')
img.save('spectrumferret.png')](https://cdn.bsky.app/img/feed_thumbnail/plain/did:plc:pna2f2fy7t6jk2imzboi4dgx/bafkreibteiiv7yu3dwc57fhxdx4frhocg63t7spoqsp3czq24gry65bnpq)
November 19, 2025 at 2:22 AM
Custom QR Code with white text on transparent background. Yeah, no, don't bother logging in to some random fly by night site 🙄. #Python
BTQ Technologies Pioneers Quantum Error Correction for Reliable Quantum Systems#Canada#Vancouver#Quantum_Computing#BTQ_Technologies#Error_Correction
BTQ Technologies Pioneers Quantum Error Correction for Reliable Quantum Systems
BTQ Technologies, through research led by Dr. Gavin K. Brennen, unveils a novel error-correction theory for permutation-invariant codes, enhancing quantum systems' reliability and scalability.
third-news.com
April 16, 2026 at 11:40 AM
BTQ Technologies Pioneers Quantum Error Correction for Reliable Quantum Systems#Canada#Vancouver#Quantum_Computing#BTQ_Technologies#Error_Correction
Worth attention
• Review the security assumptions of the Amazon lattice‑cryptanalysis claim ([2000011]); compare its algorithmic steps to NIST PQC specifications and seek independent verification.
#error_correction #cryptography #hardware https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the security assumptions of the Amazon lattice‑cryptanalysis claim ([2000011]); compare its algorithmic steps to NIST PQC specifications and seek independent verification.
#error_correction #cryptography #hardware https://qrater.org
(3/3)
August 7, 2026 at 12:01 PM
Worth attention
• Review the security assumptions of the Amazon lattice‑cryptanalysis claim ([2000011]); compare its algorithmic steps to NIST PQC specifications and seek independent verification.
#error_correction #cryptography #hardware https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Review the security assumptions of the Amazon lattice‑cryptanalysis claim ([2000011]); compare its algorithmic steps to NIST PQC specifications and seek independent verification.
#error_correction #cryptography #hardware https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Examine experimental photon pair rates and coherence stability of the sunlight entanglement source (2000000) to assess practicality under variable illumination.
#photonics #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine experimental photon pair rates and coherence stability of the sunlight entanglement source (2000000) to assess practicality under variable illumination.
#photonics #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
August 6, 2026 at 6:57 PM
Worth attention
• Examine experimental photon pair rates and coherence stability of the sunlight entanglement source (2000000) to assess practicality under variable illumination.
#photonics #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Examine experimental photon pair rates and coherence stability of the sunlight entanglement source (2000000) to assess practicality under variable illumination.
#photonics #hardware #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
Worth attention
• Test entry 2000000’s DSE‑guided learner on a publicly available 80‑qubit device to confirm predicted learnable vs intractable regimes experimentally.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Test entry 2000000’s DSE‑guided learner on a publicly available 80‑qubit device to confirm predicted learnable vs intractable regimes experimentally.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
August 4, 2026 at 12:27 PM
Worth attention
• Test entry 2000000’s DSE‑guided learner on a publicly available 80‑qubit device to confirm predicted learnable vs intractable regimes experimentally.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)
• Test entry 2000000’s DSE‑guided learner on a publicly available 80‑qubit device to confirm predicted learnable vs intractable regimes experimentally.
#hardware #algorithms #error_correction https://qrater.org
(3/3)