TikTok video by ovaloffense

A federal judge has largely blocked sweeping executive orders from President Donald Trump that sought to end government support for programs promoting diversity, equity and inclusion.

A federal judge halts ICE operations, addressing unconstitutional racial profiling in a landmark ruling in Los Angeles.

U.S. District Judge Rudolph Contreras found that the termination violated long-standing Supreme Court precedent limiting the president’s ability to remove independent officials.

A federal judge has ruled that the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts cannot honor President Donald Trump with an inscription on the building's exterior. U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Cooper issued the ruling on Tuesday, blocking the president's hand-picked board from restoring Trump's name after an earlier order forced its removal. The judge stated that the board cannot install memorials for Trump or anyone else without Congress's approval, emphasizing that the board's resolution violates a federal court order and a statute enacted by Congress. The Kennedy Center's board had initially added Trump's name to the building's formal title in December 2025, crediting him with securing $257 million for a renovation. However, Judge Cooper ruled in May that the renaming was unlawful, as only Congress has the authority to authorize such changes, and ordered the removal of the name. The center complied with the order while appealing the decision. Last month, the board attempted to circumvent the ruling by proposing an inscription reading 'renovated and restored by President Donald J. Trump' beneath the main signage. The judge declined to rule on a separate proposed inscription, 'endowed by The Trump Kennedy Center Fund,' as the center stated it would not pursue that until an associated fund reaches $100 million. Democratic lawmakers, including Rep. Joyce Beatty of Ohio, an ex officio board member suing the center, strongly objected to the inscription effort, calling it a 'breathtaking act of defiance.' The center's officials and Justice Department lawyers argued that the inscription was necessary to maintain Trump's support, warning that donor withdrawals and financial contributions drying up could halt structural rehabilitation. Beatty's lawyers countered that Trump was effectively 'taking the center hostage.' The Kennedy Center has experienced artist cancellations, declining attendance, and donor withdrawals since Trump became chairman. The board sought to work around a federal law prohibiting 'additional memorials or plaques in the nature of memorials' at the center. The case remains before the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, with a potential appeal to the Supreme Court. Cooper's ruling came shortly before a board meeting where members were expected to consider closing the main building for two years due to hazards, including plaster that recently fell from the Grand Foyer ceiling during a storm. A previous closure attempt was blocked after the court found board members had been 'derelict' in reviewing the plan. The ruling underscores the legal and political complexities surrounding the Kennedy Center's efforts to honor Trump, highlighting the tension between executive authority and congressional oversight in public institutions.

A federal judge in California ruled that the U.S. government is unconstitutionally silencing critics of Israel’s actions in Gaza by deporting noncitizens who express dissent. The decision, citing First Amendment protections, builds on a prior ruling from a Boston court that found the Trump administration violated constitutional rights by targeting individuals for supporting Palestinians and criticizing Israel. Judge Noël Wise emphasized that free speech and press freedoms are foundational to American democracy, striking down provisions allowing deportations based solely on political views. The ruling follows retaliation by immigration authorities against activists advocating for Palestinian causes and critics of figures like Charlie Kirk. The judge warned that such policies threaten the core principle of free expression, stating that the government cannot suppress dissent without violating constitutional safeguards. Legal experts praised the decision as a critical defense of First Amendment rights, highlighting its importance in protecting academic freedom and political discourse.

via NBC News Top Stories — A federal judge issued a temporary restraining order that prevents the Postal Service from inserting itself into the election process while litigation continues.

A U.S. judge has ruled against the Trump administration's plan to relocate the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) headquarters from Maryland to a federal office building in Washington, D.C., citing unlawful actions. The decision, issued by Judge Theodore D. Chuang, an Obama appointee, overturned previous efforts by Trump officials to shift the FBI's main operations to the Ronald Reagan Building, which is located near the agency's current Pennsylvania Avenue headquarters. The dispute stems from a long-standing debate over where to house the FBI's primary office. During former President Joe Biden's administration, a site in Greenbelt, Maryland, was selected as the preferred location after an intense competition with nearby Virginia. However, Trump appointees sought to reverse this decision, arguing that repurposing the Reagan Building would be more cost-effective. The judge found that the administration's attempt to redirect funds and alter the plan violated legal procedures. Maryland and Prince George's County, which had invested decades in securing the Greenbelt site, welcomed the ruling as a victory. The FBI's current headquarters, the J. Edgar Hoover Building, has faced criticism for its outdated infrastructure, prompting calls for relocation. This case highlights tensions between executive branch decisions and judicial oversight in federal agency operations.

A federal judge has ruled that the Trump administration cannot overturn the decision to relocate the FBI headquarters from Washington, D.C., to Maryland, citing improper interference by the Justice Department. The ruling, issued on August 17, 2026, determined that the Department of Justice overstepped its authority by attempting to override the U.S. General Services Administration's (GSA) Biden-era decision to move the agency's headquarters. The GSA had previously approved the relocation, which was intended to reduce the federal footprint in Washington and promote decentralization. The Trump administration had sought to keep the FBI headquarters in D.C., arguing that the move would weaken national security and disrupt operations. However, the judge emphasized that the GSA's decision was a formal administrative process that the Justice Department could not unilaterally alter. This ruling underscores the legal boundaries of executive power and the importance of adhering to established bureaucratic procedures. The case highlights ongoing tensions between the Trump administration and federal agencies, as well as the role of the judiciary in checking executive overreach. The decision may have long-term implications for how future administrations handle agency relocations and interagency conflicts. Critics argue that the ruling reinforces the separation of powers, while supporters of the administration claim it reflects an unnecessary judicial intervention in policy decisions. The FBI's relocation remains a contentious issue, with debates over its impact on national security, cost-efficiency, and political influence.

A judge criticizes the Trump administration's response, labeling it "woefully insufficient," raising questions about accountability and leadership. #Trump #JudicialRuling #Accountability #Justice #Leadership

<p>WASHINGTON, D.C. - A federal judge has ordered the White House to restore The Associated Press' access to presidential events, ruling that the government's ban violated First Amendment protections ...

U.S. President Donald Trump has announced that he will transfer control of the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts back to Congress after a federal judge ruled aspects of his takeover effort unlawful. The decision follows mounting legal and institutional challenges surrounding Trump’s attempt to reshape governance of the historic Washington, D.C. cultural institution. According to court findings, the administration’s actions conflicted with the legal framework that designates the Kennedy Center as a memorial to President John F. Kennedy and limits changes to its identity and oversight structure. The ruling also ordered that Trump’s name be removed from the building, reinforcing the judge’s interpretation that the centre must retain its original designation. Trump stated on social media that he would work with Congress to transfer responsibility for the institution, including its operation, maintenance, and management. He indicated that the Department of Commerce had been instructed to facilitate the transition. The Kennedy Center had previously been overseen by a bipartisan board of trustees, but the governance structure was altered after Trump replaced board members with allies who later installed him as chair. Critics argued this move concentrated control in a way that was inconsistent with the institution’s independent status. The Kennedy Center, which receives federal funding while operating independently, has been at the centre of broader disputes over proposed renovations and closures. The administration’s plan to close the venue for extensive upgrades was also challenged in court. Officials connected to the centre have maintained that significant maintenance work is required, though some speculation linked the closure to declining attendance. The ruling represents a setback for Trump’s wider efforts to influence major national landmarks in Washington. The case remains part of a broader series of legal disputes concerning federal authority, cultural institutions, and executive power over historically protected sites.

Google responds to the DOJ's judgment in its antitrust lawsuit.

Blog Mobile Portfolio Widgets About Us Advertise Help & Support Authors Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks. Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed. Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website. It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website. Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.

Comey and James Win Dismissal After Court Rules Prosecutor Appointment Unlawful WASHINGTON (Journos News) A federal judge on Monday dismissed

Last reply by Admin on Sat, 13 Sep 2025 17:11:50 +0000

A federal judge has blocked President Donald Trump from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, ruling that she can remain in her… The post Fed Governor Lisa Cook Prevails After Judge Blocks Trump From Firing Her appeared first on Shine My Crown.