Politics has never been a sport for the loyal, but watching Europe’s right-wing figures dash for the exits after the U.S.

House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.) encouraged his GOP colleagues to “maximize our remaining days in power” by preparing for an expected onslaught of Democratic investigations. In a letter to...

The Albanese government's approach to data centres has been characterised by indecision and a reliance on the concept of 'social licence', which critics argue is a misrepresentation of the industry's impact. The article highlights how Labor has shifted positions on data centres as community opposition has grown, particularly in areas directly affected by their presence. Issues such as resource consumption, power and water usage, and the impact on local communities have been sidelined in favour of vague political rhetoric. The government's repeated use of 'social licence' as a shield against criticism fails to address the core concerns of voters, who are increasingly frustrated with the tech industry's influence and the lack of tangible benefits from data centres. The piece also draws parallels to the US political landscape, where tech industry backlash contributed to significant electoral losses for the Republican party. The author argues that data centres represent a global industry with substantial economic impacts, including contributing to inflation and interest rates, yet offer little social or economic benefit to communities. The article concludes that Labor's fence-sitting approach is not only ineffective but also risks further alienating voters who feel their concerns are being ignored. The government's failure to balance the needs of the AI industry with community welfare has led to a growing disconnect between policy and public sentiment, potentially harming both economic growth and political stability.

That’s it. That’s the tweet. That’s the title of the op-ed. That’s the content of the op-ed. That’s the ask. The trans movement needs you to lie to cis people: we need you to tell them you won’t vote for transphobic Democrats. Regardless of whether you can or can’t stomach voting for transphobic Dem

A recent report has raised significant concerns about the early voter data of a Republican candidate, describing it as so poor that it 'sent a chill' through the campaign team. The report, detailed in a news article by David McAfee for Raw Story, highlights the severity of the data issues that have emerged during the candidate's campaign efforts. The article, published on November 1, 2026, at 11:55 AM ET, discusses the implications of these data problems on the campaign's strategy and effectiveness. David McAfee, who joined Raw Story in 2023 after nearly a decade of writing about the legal industry for Bloomberg Law, is also a co-founder and commissioning editor at Hypatia Press, a publisher specializing in philosophical works that challenge religion or spirituality. The report's findings suggest that the candidate's campaign is facing serious challenges in gathering and analyzing voter data, which is crucial for effective campaign management. The poor quality of the data has reportedly caused internal alarm within the campaign, with team members expressing concern over the potential impact on voter outreach and engagement. The article does not provide specific details about the candidate or the exact nature of the data issues, but it emphasizes the gravity of the situation as described by the report. Campaign data accuracy is vital for targeting specific demographics, predicting voter behavior, and allocating resources efficiently. The mention of 'sent a chill' indicates a strong negative reaction within the campaign, suggesting that the data problems are not merely technical but have significant strategic implications. The report's timing, just before the election, adds urgency to the situation, as campaigns typically rely on accurate data to make critical decisions in the final stages of an election cycle. The article's focus on the data issues rather than the candidate's policies or platform suggests that the campaign's operational challenges are a key concern for the team. While the report does not name the candidate, it underscores the importance of data integrity in modern political campaigns. The implications of such data issues could extend beyond the current election, affecting the campaign's reputation and future strategies. The article's publication on Raw Story, a news outlet known for its political coverage, lends credibility to the report, though the specific sources of the data issues are not disclosed. The lack of detailed information about the candidate or the specific data problems limits the ability to assess the full scope of the issue, but the report's tone indicates a serious problem that is being taken seriously within the campaign.

via US news | The Guardian — No election outcome ever interprets itself. So how will Democrats interpret these results once they are known? Whichever metaphor one prefers – landslide, earthquake, wave – it seems increasingly like the Democrats can expect a significant victory in the midterms . As the joke goes, every gas station display of prices has become an ad for Democrats; what’s more, some of them have managed to connect the relatively abstract issue of corruption to the daily misery of many Americans. Continue readin

Harvesting Happiness · Episode

via Robert Reich — Friends, Democrats have a good shot at taking control of the House and perhaps even the Senate, Trump’s approval ratings are among the lowest of any president on record, and the 80-year-old president is looking and acting ever more demented. So how long will he last, and what’s likely to do him in? I’ve posed that question to an array of president watchers, advisers, and historians, and I’ve grouped their responses below. (None talked about him dying in office, although that possibility can’t be

Western and Russian pressure represent fundamentally different categories of threat to the ruling party. Foreign policy is structured accordingly.

YouTube video by Clay