Booty shorts with a prop65 warning on them
March 13, 2026 at 11:17 PM
Booty shorts with a prop65 warning on them
Ballbusting dominatrix who calls herself Prop65 the way she causes reproductive harm.
March 13, 2026 at 11:38 PM
Ballbusting dominatrix who calls herself Prop65 the way she causes reproductive harm.
Everything triggers a Prop65 label.
November 28, 2025 at 5:06 AM
Everything triggers a Prop65 label.
Sweet Tea would require a Prop65 warning in California.
September 30, 2023 at 5:49 PM
Sweet Tea would require a Prop65 warning in California.
What about Prop65 label?
April 14, 2025 at 9:05 PM
What about Prop65 label?
Spoken like someone who has never seen a prop65 warning on like everything that ships to california. At a certain point warnings stop being useful when your seaweed paper tells you it might cause cancer.
December 28, 2023 at 2:02 PM
Spoken like someone who has never seen a prop65 warning on like everything that ships to california. At a certain point warnings stop being useful when your seaweed paper tells you it might cause cancer.
Do you think lawmakers thought about how everyone would rather just slap a prop65 warning on everything rather than actually do testing?
March 13, 2026 at 11:16 PM
Do you think lawmakers thought about how everyone would rather just slap a prop65 warning on everything rather than actually do testing?
Seems like virtually everything comes with a prop65 warning these days.
One thing I was unaware of, it includes this: "Furniture and Household Items: Products containing flame retardants or PVC" Looks like some wiring or controller parts having PVC content got your controller a prop65 warning
One thing I was unaware of, it includes this: "Furniture and Household Items: Products containing flame retardants or PVC" Looks like some wiring or controller parts having PVC content got your controller a prop65 warning
April 2, 2026 at 1:29 AM
Seems like virtually everything comes with a prop65 warning these days.
One thing I was unaware of, it includes this: "Furniture and Household Items: Products containing flame retardants or PVC" Looks like some wiring or controller parts having PVC content got your controller a prop65 warning
One thing I was unaware of, it includes this: "Furniture and Household Items: Products containing flame retardants or PVC" Looks like some wiring or controller parts having PVC content got your controller a prop65 warning
Oh, for some reason I was thinking 👓not 🍻
And even if the feds didn't look for it, it would trigger prop65 labels? No?
And even if the feds didn't look for it, it would trigger prop65 labels? No?
November 28, 2025 at 4:55 AM
Oh, for some reason I was thinking 👓not 🍻
And even if the feds didn't look for it, it would trigger prop65 labels? No?
And even if the feds didn't look for it, it would trigger prop65 labels? No?
The guitar i bought came with a Prop65 Californian carcinogenic warning label which was a surprise! 👀
I googled - turns out it's for anything produced with harsh chemicals and not in fact because the guitar is radioactive...
SO, if i promise not to eat it, i'll probably be fine! 🤞
I googled - turns out it's for anything produced with harsh chemicals and not in fact because the guitar is radioactive...
SO, if i promise not to eat it, i'll probably be fine! 🤞
August 7, 2026 at 10:35 AM
The guitar i bought came with a Prop65 Californian carcinogenic warning label which was a surprise! 👀
I googled - turns out it's for anything produced with harsh chemicals and not in fact because the guitar is radioactive...
SO, if i promise not to eat it, i'll probably be fine! 🤞
I googled - turns out it's for anything produced with harsh chemicals and not in fact because the guitar is radioactive...
SO, if i promise not to eat it, i'll probably be fine! 🤞
#Prop65 research from @ucberkeleyofficial.bsky.social Professor of Environmental Health Sciences Megan Schwarzmann and #SilentSpring Institute #EnvironmentalHealth
bsky.app/profile/nyti...
bsky.app/profile/nyti...
California’s right-to-know law, which requires companies to warn people about harmful chemicals in their products, has swayed many companies to stop using those chemicals altogether, a new study found.
California’s Scary Product Warning Labels Might Be Working, Study Says
Products must state if they contain chemicals tied to cancer or other risks. As a result, manufacturers have pulled back from using the chemicals, researchers found.
www.nytimes.com
February 13, 2025 at 6:18 PM
#Prop65 research from @ucberkeleyofficial.bsky.social Professor of Environmental Health Sciences Megan Schwarzmann and #SilentSpring Institute #EnvironmentalHealth
bsky.app/profile/nyti...
bsky.app/profile/nyti...
like, don't get me wrong, some of these products *DO* have a shockingly large amount of lead in them, and that is bad. but choosing the prop65 labeling standard over what actual health authorities recommend is... odd (there's a reason the EU figure is in milligrams/kg - not all lead is absorbed!).
October 16, 2025 at 2:22 PM
like, don't get me wrong, some of these products *DO* have a shockingly large amount of lead in them, and that is bad. but choosing the prop65 labeling standard over what actual health authorities recommend is... odd (there's a reason the EU figure is in milligrams/kg - not all lead is absorbed!).
This could lead to people discounting risks for cancer that a much higher because they get risk overload (im looking at you CA/prop65). Again out of my wheelhouse but still.
But to come back to breast cancer, we actually recognize the risk of mental worry (someone gets me!_
But to come back to breast cancer, we actually recognize the risk of mental worry (someone gets me!_
October 9, 2025 at 10:54 PM
This could lead to people discounting risks for cancer that a much higher because they get risk overload (im looking at you CA/prop65). Again out of my wheelhouse but still.
But to come back to breast cancer, we actually recognize the risk of mental worry (someone gets me!_
But to come back to breast cancer, we actually recognize the risk of mental worry (someone gets me!_
Also instead of "wondering why" google is free. You can actually find out the origin of Prop65
December 28, 2023 at 2:10 PM
Also instead of "wondering why" google is free. You can actually find out the origin of Prop65
New equivalent to Prop65 warning stickers: "This comic may bear resemblance to Will Stancil and this is in no way intentional"
and just slap it on everything from Family Circus to Garfield
and just slap it on everything from Family Circus to Garfield
July 22, 2026 at 6:48 AM
New equivalent to Prop65 warning stickers: "This comic may bear resemblance to Will Stancil and this is in no way intentional"
and just slap it on everything from Family Circus to Garfield
and just slap it on everything from Family Circus to Garfield
Always a pleasure to come to Sacramento to help with the process of chemical regulation in California. Bonus: I get to experience rain a little! #CaliforniaEPA #Prop65
December 12, 2024 at 11:02 PM
Always a pleasure to come to Sacramento to help with the process of chemical regulation in California. Bonus: I get to experience rain a little! #CaliforniaEPA #Prop65
i'm not sure why consumer reports chose to use the prop65 standards [which is a labeling threshold for prop65 safe harbor clams (oehha.ca.gov/proposition-...), not a safety one] of 5ug and not the FDA 8.8ug total daily or EU 3 mg/kg for supplements [0.1mh/kf for food]
October 16, 2025 at 2:21 PM
i'm not sure why consumer reports chose to use the prop65 standards [which is a labeling threshold for prop65 safe harbor clams (oehha.ca.gov/proposition-...), not a safety one] of 5ug and not the FDA 8.8ug total daily or EU 3 mg/kg for supplements [0.1mh/kf for food]
I have to wonder if the soil and water in the area are just as contaminated as a super fund site or other industrial disaster areas.
Maybe it all needs a warning/disclaimer.
Maybe it all needs a warning/disclaimer.
January 12, 2025 at 7:44 PM
I have to wonder if the soil and water in the area are just as contaminated as a super fund site or other industrial disaster areas.
Maybe it all needs a warning/disclaimer.
Maybe it all needs a warning/disclaimer.
I'm all for stealing from big biz... But NOT little artists.
I'll bet it was Shopify that stepped in.
Those chemicals aren't egregiously dangerous, but they DO violate Prop65 labeling requirements so that was my backup.
I'll bet it was Shopify that stepped in.
Those chemicals aren't egregiously dangerous, but they DO violate Prop65 labeling requirements so that was my backup.
March 8, 2025 at 10:38 PM
I'm all for stealing from big biz... But NOT little artists.
I'll bet it was Shopify that stepped in.
Those chemicals aren't egregiously dangerous, but they DO violate Prop65 labeling requirements so that was my backup.
I'll bet it was Shopify that stepped in.
Those chemicals aren't egregiously dangerous, but they DO violate Prop65 labeling requirements so that was my backup.
Spotted Biore Aqua Rich at Tokyo Central. Despite similar packaging and misleading marketing touting its popularity in Japan, the ingredients are different.
(Unless you’re severely susceptible, ignore the prop65 warning. It’s on so many things and doesn’t take into account dosage)
#smb
(Unless you’re severely susceptible, ignore the prop65 warning. It’s on so many things and doesn’t take into account dosage)
#smb
January 27, 2025 at 12:33 AM
Spotted Biore Aqua Rich at Tokyo Central. Despite similar packaging and misleading marketing touting its popularity in Japan, the ingredients are different.
(Unless you’re severely susceptible, ignore the prop65 warning. It’s on so many things and doesn’t take into account dosage)
#smb
(Unless you’re severely susceptible, ignore the prop65 warning. It’s on so many things and doesn’t take into account dosage)
#smb
prop65 is a based law the problem is a lot of the exposure limits are low so you get warnings from everything so it results in exposure fatigue so people don't take it seriously.
June 28, 2026 at 5:01 PM
prop65 is a based law the problem is a lot of the exposure limits are low so you get warnings from everything so it results in exposure fatigue so people don't take it seriously.
I'm a chemical engineer actively working to reduce red list chemicals in building and construction materials, the formaldehyde discussion is exasperating. Don't even get me started on Prop65. There is so much superfluous regulatory noise that's only there as personal ass coverage.
December 9, 2024 at 7:56 PM
I'm a chemical engineer actively working to reduce red list chemicals in building and construction materials, the formaldehyde discussion is exasperating. Don't even get me started on Prop65. There is so much superfluous regulatory noise that's only there as personal ass coverage.
Consequently it makes prop65 useless.
March 13, 2026 at 11:23 PM
Consequently it makes prop65 useless.
I found this video very re-assuring.
This creator works in the food industry and has shared really good information on things like recalls and manufacturing in the past (and I work in a related field and what they share is in line with the professional trainings I have attended)
This creator works in the food industry and has shared really good information on things like recalls and manufacturing in the past (and I work in a related field and what they share is in line with the professional trainings I have attended)
hydroxide.foodscience on Instagram: "It’s always Prop65, it’s like a vampire that you have to let in #foodscience #proteinView all 169 comments"
It’s always Prop65, it’s like a vampire that you have to let in #foodscience #protein
www.instagram.com
October 16, 2025 at 3:31 PM
I found this video very re-assuring.
This creator works in the food industry and has shared really good information on things like recalls and manufacturing in the past (and I work in a related field and what they share is in line with the professional trainings I have attended)
This creator works in the food industry and has shared really good information on things like recalls and manufacturing in the past (and I work in a related field and what they share is in line with the professional trainings I have attended)
