Free open-source password manager for businesses with SAML, LDAP, audit logs, and compliance policy features. Supports Windows, Linux, Mac.

Psono è un password manager open source e self-hosted con cifratura lato client, condivisione sicura, MFA e strumenti per team e aziende

Vulnerability-Lookup - Fast vulnerability lookup correlation from different sources.

Free open-source password manager for businesses with SAML, LDAP, audit logs, and compliance policy features. Supports Windows, Linux, Mac.

Password managers allow you to securely store and manage passwords and other credentials.

Debunk the top 10 password security myths and learn how to protect your online accounts with actionable tips for stronger, safer passwords.

Five practical DevOps security practices for protecting CI/CD pipelines, secrets, access rights, infrastructure, and production systems.

Experts from Psono have highlighted various modern scams that are becoming increasingly sophisticated due to advances in AI technology. These scams now include AI-powered phishing techniques, which involve using artificial intelligence to mimic the voices and videos of family or...

A practical step-by-step guide for containing damage, recovering accounts, protecting money and data, and reducing the chance of getting hacked again.

Thanks for the trick. I checked the saved card details inside Bitwarden, and while editing, it was grouped in sets of 4 numbers. I’ve now removed the spaces between the card number — let’s see how that goes. Do you know of any solution for the expiration year issue? If the website asks for the full expiration year (e.g., 2027), autofill works fine, but when the website asks for just the last two digits of the expiration year (e.g., 27), autofill doesn’t work completely. I’m not sure about the autofill issue, as I’ve done everything I possibly can, but sometimes the option named “Autofill services” (inside the Settings page) is completely greyed out instead of staying blue, which means autofill services has stopped working. Switching the autofill service from Bitwarden to None, and then back to Bitwarden, fixes it. Honestly, I don’t want to keep facing hassles with my password manager anymore. I need to access it every single day, on both my mobile and desktop. Sometimes I’m not in the mood to prioritize troubleshooting an issue, I just copy the login credentials and close the app. I can still continue paying for Bitwarden, but they need to offer something I can actually make use of — like an error-free experience, good theme options (preferably an AMOLED black theme), and a more organized design throughout the app. After yesterday’s incident, I’m growing slightly hesitant about using Bitwarden. I understand cloud-based services come with a lot of dependencies in the background, but still, a well-known password manager like Bitwarden throwing an error that new changes wouldn’t save due to synchronization issues is concerning. I checked the app twice within a gap of around 30 minutes, and both times I ran into that same error. As for Proton Pass, I can’t say much about how the app performs, but I believe every cloud-based app should store new changes locally and upload them to the cloud later if there’s a network issue — that way, users don’t have to suffer.

Thanks for the trick. I checked the saved card details inside Bitwarden, and while editing, it was grouped in sets of 4 numbers. I’ve now removed the spaces between the card number — let’s see how that goes. Do you know of any solution for the expiration year issue? If the website asks for the full expiration year (e.g., 2027), autofill works fine, but when the website asks for just the last two digits of the expiration year (e.g., 27), autofill doesn’t work completely. I’m not sure about the autofill issue, as I’ve done everything I possibly can, but sometimes the option named “Autofill services” (inside the Settings page) is completely greyed out instead of staying blue, which means autofill services has stopped working. Switching the autofill service from Bitwarden to None, and then back to Bitwarden, fixes it. Honestly, I don’t want to keep facing hassles with my password manager anymore. I need to access it every single day, on both my mobile and desktop. Sometimes I’m not in the mood to prioritize troubleshooting an issue, I just copy the login credentials and close the app. I can still continue paying for Bitwarden, but they need to offer something I can actually make use of — like an error-free experience, good theme options (preferably an AMOLED black theme), and a more organized design throughout the app. After yesterday’s incident, I’m growing slightly hesitant about using Bitwarden. I understand cloud-based services come with a lot of dependencies in the background, but still, a well-known password manager like Bitwarden throwing an error that new changes wouldn’t save due to synchronization issues is concerning. I checked the app twice within a gap of around 30 minutes, and both times I ran into that same error. As for Proton Pass, I can’t say much about how the app performs, but I believe every cloud-based app should store new changes locally and upload them to the cloud later if there’s a network issue — that way, users don’t have to suffer.

Nah, you misunderstood it. I’ve kept KeePass as a backup solution. Instead of exporting the database from Bitwarden every month and uploading it to a KeePass database — which resulted in multiple copies of the same credentials — I’m doing everything manually myself. By following this approach, KeePass also acts as a proper password manager instead of just a backup. In case of emergencies, if I don’t have access to my Bitwarden account for any reason, I can copy the required credentials from KeePass — that was my plan. Cloud-based services can make synchronization smoother, but these services have a lot of dependency on the cloud, so if there’s any problem on their backend, cloud sync might not work for users. That’s where a completely offline password manager can be the lifesaver. Now, I can’t use KeePass as my regular password manager due to my multi-device usage. Maintaining a local password manager as a backup option and adding the new entries in my free time is far easier than syncing a local password manager’s database across all my devices everytime I add a new entry. The first one is a part of precaution, while the second one becomes a necessity. Using copy-paste with Bitwarden is because of its lack of optimization. Even after adding the accurate website link, it sometimes refuses to autofill anything — at the very least, it should show a “locked vault” option on the keyboard bar, so I can open the Bitwarden app directly instead of going back to my device’s home screen, then the app drawer, and then opening Bitwarden.

The prompt is usually the same both times. The format plays the big role here. On some payment sites, the expiration date field is labeled as MM/YY, while on others, it’s labeled as MM/YYYY. Now, I’ve saved my card’s expiration date in MM/YY format on Bitwarden, so when a site uses the MM/YYYY format, Bitwarden doesn’t autofill anything — not the card number, not the CVV, nothing. My problem is this: if a site uses a different expiration date format, Bitwarden should at least autofill the other details of my card, but instead it fails completely. The same thing happens when some sites use list selections — a dropdown list of months where the user selects the expiration month, and a similar list for years. In these cases too, Bitwarden refuses to fill anything.

The part that caught my attention is that you’re keeping most of your credentials in KeePass because of the cloud dependency issues, while using copy/paste when Bitwarden’s Android autofill acts up. I’m curious where you draw the line on convenience here: if a password manager were more reliable as a local vault but required you to manually copy/paste credentials, would that actually be acceptable for your daily use? Or has reliable autofill become a hard requirement at this point?

Password manager for securely storing and sharing sensitive data

I would never use a closed source password manager

Raise new Psono account scrypt cost from N=2^14 to N=2^18 in the webclient registration defaults.