YouTube video by Ezker Anitza IU

The president paid tribute to victims, rescuers and families, named passengers such as Todd Beamer and a fallen officer George Howard, and urged calm, donations to listed organizations and cooperation with investigations.

Second-order beliefs among citizens, elected political elites, and unelected political elites: Insights from Norwegian climate policy

Across political ideologies, people in the U.S. overwhelmingly gravitate toward technologies presented as natural and reject those that seem unnatural. The

YouTube video by Jon Danzig

Pramila Jayapal Says Momentum For Medicare For All Is Growing.

Board unanimously approves various special event permits for outdoor music and celebrations.

How people perceive the naturalness of climate technologies can strongly shape whether they support them. Among US adults, technologies seen as more natural

Representative Murray voices strong opposition to expanding an expensive and unpopular education program.

Asked about a housing bill with an imminent Friday deadline, the president said he would decide and used the opportunity to promote the "Save America Act," describing it as requiring voter ID, proof of citizenship and limits on mail‑in ballots and claiming 94% public support.

Staff reported several unsolicited capital asks from museums and cultural institutions totaling about $90 million; commissioners urged a collective, criteria-based evaluation rather than ad hoc awards after multiple large requests appeared following the stadium and zoo funding discussions.

Jeffrey Sovern, an engineer, faces criminal charges for allegedly destroying Flock surveillance cameras, sparking public debate over privacy rights and corporate overreach. The incident has garnered widespread support, with over 1,500 people contributing to a GoFundMe campaign to cover his legal defense costs. Sovern's actions, which involved dismantling cameras mounted on poles, have been framed by supporters as a justified response to mass surveillance practices. Critics argue that the cameras, operated by a private company under contract with local authorities, infringe on citizens' privacy rights. Legal experts note that Sovern's case could set a precedent for how courts handle disputes between individuals and private surveillance entities. The controversy highlights broader tensions between technological advancement, civil liberties, and the role of private corporations in public safety. Advocacy groups are calling for regulatory reforms to address the ethical implications of pervasive surveillance systems. Meanwhile, law enforcement maintains that the cameras are legal and necessary for crime prevention. This case has ignited national conversations about the balance between security and privacy in the digital age.