#ThisImageIsFine
From my collection of Horrible Editorial Decisions, I present to you another installation of #ThisImageIsFine, published in @Sciencedirect's International Immunopharmacology, and which was promptly addressed with a ... Correction! 😱
#ImageForensics
pubpeer.com/publications...
November 10, 2026 at 8:40 PM
@elisabethbik.bsky.social first spotted a terrible patchwork of image duplication in one of the figures, back in 2022. One year later, the @mdpiopenaccess.bsky.social editor decided to accept a correction, substituting the figure for an uninspired piece of digital artwork 🥸 #ThisImageIsFine
November 11, 2026 at 9:04 AM
Well done, @mumumouse2.bsky.social and @nvitiensis.bsky.social ! 🤝
Retraction #41 for JRX from Saveetha engineering college, India
#ResearchIntegrity 🔍 #ImageForensics #FoSci #ThisImageIsFine 🕵️ #ScientificIntegrity #Academia
And one more for Joseph Raj Xavier! This time @tomk.eurosky.social didn't cause the retraction...

doi.org/10.1007/s117...
September 5, 2026 at 4:44 PM
January 5, 2025 at 10:41 PM
Welcome! Added #ImageForensics ! And I've now also added #ThisImageIsFine

Fun world I'm learning of. I'll update the tagged 1st post with the full list of hashtags once the list settles. But right now have many more included.
January 4, 2025 at 7:07 PM
Still laughing about this a year later. #ThisImageIsFine

researcher meme stash submission for @drmeagantyler.bsky.social
Uh, I think @elisabethbik.bsky.social has some explaining to do
December 12, 2025 at 9:03 AM
Oh, come on, @aaas.org Science Translational Medicine, correcting a paper for a photoshopped image?
That is absolutely bonkers, and you should do much, much better.

#ThisImageIsFine #ImageForensics
May 8, 2026 at 8:47 PM
Instead of investigating properly, the journal issued a *corrigendum* 😱
"The authors regret that Figure 3D were mistakenly uploaded - corrections do not affect the conclusion."

The original figure was simply replaced with a completely different set of images😭

#ThisImageIsFine
April 22, 2026 at 5:52 PM
1. They did not catch the repetitive areas in the original figure
2. They did not address the PubPeer concerns about photoshopping with a retraction - instead, they allowed the authors to replace all panels 😡
3. They did not check if the new panels were ok.
#ThisImageIsFine
January 30, 2026 at 10:51 PM
Spot the two overlaps and you might win an Emoji Award!
Each panel is from a differently treated rat, so there should not be any overlaps.

#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 22, 2026 at 5:47 PM
It's a beauty!
Can you spot the problems here? Find at least two for your chance of winning one of the three Emoji Awards.
#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 18, 2026 at 9:05 PM
An easy one today.
Four TEM photos, four different formulations of 'quantum dots'.
Can you spot the unexpected overlap?

#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 17, 2026 at 6:31 PM
January 16, 2026 at 9:12 PM
A nice and easy #ImageForensics challenge, sent to me by a reader.
Can you spot the problem here?

#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 16, 2026 at 2:43 AM
There are two sets of overlapping panels in this figure.
Can you spot them both?
Each panel is a differently treated rat.
#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 12, 2026 at 11:05 PM
Two sets of panels look identical, and another set of panels overlaps.

Can you spot at least two of the three problems here?

#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 11, 2026 at 9:38 PM
After yesterday's very hard challenge, I will give you a super easy one. Can you spot the duplication?
#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 9, 2026 at 8:15 PM
No replies yet.... It is a hard one!
Hint: focus on the bottom right panel - there is something unexpected going on there.
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
#ImageForensics
January 9, 2026 at 5:30 PM
A pretty hard #ImageForensics.
Can you spot the duplication?
#ThisImageIsFine
#ScientificPublishing
January 9, 2026 at 12:54 AM
Despite clear evidence of image manipulation, @elsevierconnect.bsky.social's BBRC did not retract the paper. Instead, authors were allowed to submit a new, “clean” set of figures.

This response seriously undermines research integrity.
#ThisImageIsFine #ImageForensics

pubpeer.com/publications...
January 8, 2026 at 8:45 PM
The second #retraction for the group of Kalipada Pahan at @rushmedical.bsky.social, with findings by @mumumouse2.bsky.social and myself.

36 of his papers have made it to @pubpeer.com.

Kudos to @pnas.org.

www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...
pubpeer.com/publications...

#ImageForensics #ThisImageIsFine
January 8, 2026 at 12:37 AM
This is a nice #ImageForensics.
So far, I have found three problems in this paper. Can you spot at least two?
#ThisImageIsFine
December 26, 2025 at 7:17 PM
A nice #ImageForensics for those who are still behind a screen. Can you spot a problem - or two - here?
#ThisImageIsFine
December 25, 2025 at 9:59 PM
Neuroscience, a @ibroorg.bsky.social journal, thought it was totally acceptable to rearrange the loading control bands a bit.
Correction: "The authors regret [...] the β-actin lanes were inadvertently misassembled, resulting in an incorrect lane order."
#ThisImageIsFine
pubpeer.com/publications...
December 21, 2025 at 8:40 PM
Retraction @plosone.org 👏 of a paper by researchers from the School of Dentistry at UCLA.

Senior researcher gave a long explanation @pubpeer.com that did not seem to make much sense.

Journal did not buy it, thankfully.

pubpeer.com/publications...
#ImageForensics #ThisImageIsFine
December 19, 2025 at 6:08 PM