So Science did a study.
ChatGPT failed.
Why? It got stuff wrong. "Also, extensive editing for hyperbole was needed." www.science.org/content/blog...
In fact, we make people sign an agreement saying that their research, analysis, writing, and creative work are *theirs* and not done by GenAI.
Our CEO has been pushing this HARD for years now, But I'm the one in my department who has planted my feet and absolutely refuses to "find a use for it" in my workflow. I have no interest in de-skilling myself. I'm John Henry in this fight and I'm not putting down my hammer.
At the time of its takedown, “Looksmaxxing GPT” had over 700,000 conversations.
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
🥳
#AbolishAi
borncity.com/blog/2026/06...
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
Lasst sie platzen!
🥳
#AbolishAi
If you let these fucking LLMs into high schools and colleges, a Nazi billionaire can tweak the bigotry dial and funnel Nazi propaganda into the classrooms.
#AbolishAI
But under pressure from the politicians or guided by his own depravity, he can rewrite history overnight by altering the output of the LLM he owns.
If you let these fucking LLMs into high schools and colleges, a Nazi billionaire can tweak the bigotry dial and funnel Nazi propaganda into the classrooms.
#AbolishAI