Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
Some might ask “what’s more free than cars?”
Choices.
Choices are more free than car dependency.
It’s not a hard concept.
I’m not pitting cars against any other single mode of transport.
I’m rejecting design that creates dependency on just one mode.
Someone: But I have to drive because [insert reason].
Me: Cities would be better for everyone, including drivers, if there was less car-dependency and…
Someone: But I have to drive because [insert reason].
Me: Cities would be better for everyone, including drivers, if there was less car-dependency and…
It takes vision and will.
It takes vision and will.
How pathetic he is.
But so does enforced car dependency.
A key difference is that enforced car dependency is a thing that is real now & enforced bike dependency is a thing that is hypothetical & has no credible prospect of happening.
But so does enforced car dependency.
A key difference is that enforced car dependency is a thing that is real now & enforced bike dependency is a thing that is hypothetical & has no credible prospect of happening.
It was and is the deprivation of choice.
It was and is the deprivation of choice.