en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedma...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedma...
➡️ https://l.euronews.com/fLRw
➡️ https://l.euronews.com/fLRw
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.25763
Xun Gong, Jun Wang, Chen-Yang Zhang.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.25763
Xun Gong, Jun Wang, Chen-Yang Zhang.
New preprint led by Cléa Millard (graduate student in our group):
arxiv.org/abs/2601.20293
#cosmology #astrophysics
New preprint led by Cléa Millard (graduate student in our group):
arxiv.org/abs/2601.20293
#cosmology #astrophysics
Thermodynamics of arbitrary spherical surfaces in FLRW spacetimes
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25763
Thermodynamics of arbitrary spherical surfaces in FLRW spacetimes
https://arxiv.org/abs/2609.25763
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.25763
Xun Gong, Jun Wang, Chen-Yang Zhang.
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2609.25763
Xun Gong, Jun Wang, Chen-Yang Zhang.
Now I'm thinking of it in terms of cosmology.
If you plot the average activation norms through all the transformer layers, they sure do look like they scale just like exp(L). Just like the scale term in the FLRW metric…
Tokens are the stars in our universe. There are exactly 151,936 of them. They are scattered through space all around us.
Now I'm thinking of it in terms of cosmology.
If you plot the average activation norms through all the transformer layers, they sure do look like they scale just like exp(L). Just like the scale term in the FLRW metric…
@rasjournals.bsky.social @royalastrosoc.bsky.social
#cosmology #universe
#BlackHoles #icgportsmouth #iiserkolkata
@rasjournals.bsky.social @royalastrosoc.bsky.social
#cosmology #universe
#BlackHoles #icgportsmouth #iiserkolkata
It _CAN_ be Minkowski, but this isn't a necessity.
It _CAN_ be Minkowski, but this isn't a necessity.
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
#physics
#theoreticalphysics
#cosmology
#scalartensor
#gravity
#eft
#flrw
#gr
#mathphys
#research
doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
#physics
#theoreticalphysics
#cosmology
#scalartensor
#gravity
#eft
#flrw
#gr
#mathphys
#research
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedma...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedma...
To me, Milne is just FLRW with density set to zero and a curvature term as the only non-zero term on the RHS.
Which is identical to placing 100% of your energy density as cosmic strings (density ~ 1/a^2).
But I solve for a and t; what do you solve for?
To me, Milne is just FLRW with density set to zero and a curvature term as the only non-zero term on the RHS.
Which is identical to placing 100% of your energy density as cosmic strings (density ~ 1/a^2).
But I solve for a and t; what do you solve for?
Rafelski, J., Birrell, J., Grayson, C. et al. Quarks to Cosmos. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2025). doi.org/10.1140/epjs...
Rafelski, J., Birrell, J., Grayson, C. et al. Quarks to Cosmos. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. (2025). doi.org/10.1140/epjs...
A concise IR scalar–tensor cosmological EFT restricted to FLRW dynamics
DOI → doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
#cosmology #darkenergy #EFT #scalartensor #physics #astro
A concise IR scalar–tensor cosmological EFT restricted to FLRW dynamics
DOI → doi.org/10.5281/zeno...
#cosmology #darkenergy #EFT #scalartensor #physics #astro