#peerreviewing
LightNews LightNews
jak5280.bsky.social
You know it is going to be a rough read when you are #peerreviewing a manuscript with three typos in the title. #science #spelling #grammar
March 21, 2026 at 9:45 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#IA #Edition #Publication #Peerreviewing #ChatGPT
themeta.news 𝖳𝗁𝖾𝖬𝖾𝗍𝖺𝖭𝖾𝗐𝗌 @themeta.news · Jan 16
🟢 Les robots à la relecture

L’IA générative ajoute un stress pour les auteurs soumettant leur manuscrit à une revue : les reviewers l’ont-ils passé à la moulinette de ChatGPT ? Si oui, que vaut leur relecture ?

Des réponses dans notre analyse de la semaine :

themeta.news/bientot-revi...
ANALYSE Bientôt reviewés par des IA ? Alors que le recours à l’IA générative explose dans la recherche, la question de son utilisation pour le peer review se pose et les éditeurs n’ont pas tous la même réponse. « Si une IA leur prémâche le travail, les reviewers mettent leurs cerveaux en veille » Une employée d’Elsevier
January 16, 2026 at 11:20 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
L'éditeur scientifique Fontiers lance le #peerreviewing par l'#AI #artificialintelligence avec son service FAIR² Data Management
Frontiers introduces FAIR² Data Management - Research Information
Publisher says its AI-powered "first-of-its-kind peer-reviewed service" turns research data into a "catalyst for breakthroughs"
www.researchinformation.info
March 6, 2025 at 5:26 AM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#IntégritéScientifique #Peerreviewing
Collection of #OpenScience Integrity Guides #OSF
via @themeta.news

osf.io/2kdez/wiki/h...
Collection of Open Science Integrity Guides
COSIG hosts accessible guides for performing post-publication peer review. Hosted on the Open Science Framework
osf.io
June 16, 2025 at 6:46 AM
kevinveenbirkenbach.microblog.infinito.nexus.ap.brid.gy
#peerreviewing in the times of #ai and #llm 🤖 💻 🔬 :

https://github.com/kevinveenbirkenbach/package-manager/commit/e117115b7facb650c4990fd160cc7efce5f367ae

#chatgpt #AI #code #development #openai #google #gemini #pairreview #testing
gpt-5.2 ChatGPT: adapt tests to new core.git commands/queries split · kevinveenbirkenbach/package-manager@e117115
- Update mirror integration tests to use probe_remote_reachable - Refactor branch action tests to mock git command helpers instead of run_git - Align changelog tests with get_changelog query API - ...
github.com
December 16, 2025 at 10:04 AM
kokedit.bsky.social
The Guardian describes the process of getting #published in #sciece #journals as #broken: In 2020 alone, #academics globally spent >100 million hours #PeerReviewing journal papers. In the US, that time spent amounted to >$1.5 billion of free labor." www.theguardian.com/science/2025... (1/2)
Quality of scientific papers questioned as academics ‘overwhelmed’ by the millions published
Widespread mockery of AI-generated rat with giant penis in one paper brings problem to public attention
www.theguardian.com
July 14, 2025 at 9:41 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Edition #Publication #Bibliométrie #Evaluation #PeerReviewing #Fraude #OpenAccess #Preprint
« Les journaux n’ont plus de lecteurs en fait ! Ils ont des auteurs. C’est une situation un peu folle »
www.lemonde.fr/sciences/art...
July 9, 2025 at 7:32 AM
amarois.bsky.social
[Report] rapport MIT- NSF sur l' #openaccess côté #USA “Access to Science & Scholarship 2024: Building an Evidence Base to Support the Future of Open Research Policy” => mitpress.mit.edu/the-mit-pres...
#openscience #impact #policies #science #peerreviewing #datasharing #infrastructures
The MIT Press releases report on the future of open access publishing and policy
The comprehensive report is the outcome of a National Science Foundation-funded workshop, identifying critical issues in open access publishing and how to address them.
mitpress.mit.edu
November 19, 2024 at 8:25 AM
dustcircle.bsky.social
To #hire good #scientists, look at their #peerreviewing records

www.nature.com/articles/d41...
To hire good scientists, look at their peer-reviewing records
Letter to the Editor
www.nature.com
April 28, 2026 at 12:37 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Edition #Publications #Peerreviewing
March 16, 2026 at 9:49 AM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Edition #Peerreviewing #IntégritéScientifique #IA
March 16, 2026 at 9:17 AM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#IA #publications #Peerreviewing
"combien de temps avant que la littérature scientifique ne soit écrite par des IA… et révisée par d’autres IA?"
February 20, 2026 at 9:55 AM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Peerreviewing #Evaluation
February 19, 2026 at 2:00 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Edition #Publication #OpenScience #peerReviewing #Evaluation
January 26, 2026 at 2:12 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#Publication #Edition #Evaluation #peerReviewing
« Il va falloir inventer de nouveaux moyens de diffuser les connaissances scientifiques » ?
cnrs.fr CNRS @cnrs.fr · Dec 18
Trop nombreuses, frauduleuses ou écrites par intelligence artificielle générative : les critiques à l’égard des publications scientifiques s’accumulent à l’heure de leur surproduction. Faut-il dès lors en faire le deuil ?
Publications scientifiques : une surproduction fatale ?
Publications scientifiques : une surproduction fatale ? | CNRS
www.cnrs.fr
December 20, 2025 at 6:06 PM
doccrenau.bsky.social
#PeerReviewing #revue #Edition #Openscience
July 4, 2025 at 9:15 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
#ArtificialInteligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts? | The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
#peerreviewing
Moins du tiers des relecteurs détecte l'utilisation d'une IA
Artificial intelligence as author: Can scientific reviewers recognize GPT-4o-generated manuscripts?
Chat Generative Pre-Trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a natural language processing model. It can be argued that ChatGPT has recently begun to assume t…
www.sciencedirect.com
August 15, 2025 at 6:12 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
What to cover during journal technical checks and how to optimize the process
Quels critères les #manuscripts des #authors doivent-ils remplir auprès des éditeurs ?
Une checklist avant #submission et #peerreviewing
What to cover during journal technical checks and how to optimize the process
What technical checks (a.k.a. quality checks) should your editorial team be completing? When should technical checks be done? And how can you optimize the process for speed and efficiency? We break do...
blog.scholasticahq.com
December 4, 2024 at 4:55 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
Distributed #peerreviewing : how Ukraine has reaped the benefits and minimized the risks — in which researchers vet grant proposals as a condition for having their own considered
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Distributed peer review: how Ukraine has reaped the benefits and minimized the risks
Letter to the Editor
www.nature.com
November 12, 2024 at 7:55 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
BishopBlog: Using PubPeer to screen editors
Utiliser #PubPeer pour surveiller les #editeurs #publishers #postpublication #peerreviewing
deevybee.blogspot.com/2024/09/usin...
Using PubPeer to screen editors
2023 was the year when academic publishers started to take seriously the threat that paper mills posed to their business. Their resear...
deevybee.blogspot.com
October 8, 2024 at 6:41 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Réflexion sur l'interaction #peerreviewing #peerreviewer et #ai #artificialinteligence
Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats: A Comprehensive SWOT Analysis of AI and Human Expertise in Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
AI-generated content has been discovered in prominent journals. Should peer reviewers be expected to find AI text in manuscripts? Where in the publication workflow should these checks be done?
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
September 29, 2024 at 6:00 AM
ndocist.eurosky.social
Remplacer l'humain par l'intelligence artificielle #artificialintelligence pour faire la revue des pairs #peerreviewing des publications scientifiques ?
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2023/09/29/e...
Ending Human-Dependent Peer Review - The Scholarly Kitchen
Human-dependent peer review is inequitable, suffers from injustice, and is potentially unsustainable. Here's why we should replace it (eventually) with AI-based peer review.
scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org
October 3, 2023 at 6:24 PM