Hundreds of thousands of private email addresses, usernames, as well as public & private chat logs were obtained by hackers.
www.dailydot.com/debug/andrew...
👌 User friendly
🔓 Open source AT Protocol
🔒 Privacy preserving
🧑🤝🧑 Humans only / No bots
And 🇪🇺 European!
👌 User friendly
🔓 Open source AT Protocol
🔒 Privacy preserving
🧑🤝🧑 Humans only / No bots
And 🇪🇺 European!
We designed Bluesky with the openness of the internet in mind. You can think of your profile as a blog on the internet.
For more on data privacy, read our user FAQ:
We have very careful access controls within our systems.
If you're extremely privacy conscious, I'd recommend using Bluesky DMs to share your Signal accounts!
We have very careful access controls within our systems.
If you're extremely privacy conscious, I'd recommend using Bluesky DMs to share your Signal accounts!
I feel like that's a big, big miss for this. The protocol still assumes everything is public, and that's going to be a problem.
Read more here for how this will affect your experience on Bluesky (in short: it won’t) and why this matters.
bsky.social/about/blog/0...
I feel like that's a big, big miss for this. The protocol still assumes everything is public, and that's going to be a problem.
> condescendingly dunk on users asking for privacy controls, because "the protocol"
> perform all moderation actions openly on the protocol
> get buttmad at users for viewing/discussing moderation actions taken openly on the protocol
> condescendingly dunk on users asking for privacy controls, because "the protocol"
> perform all moderation actions openly on the protocol
> get buttmad at users for viewing/discussing moderation actions taken openly on the protocol
if you want privacy, posting unencrypted things on a protocol that is inherently open to the public is not a very good idea
as of right now i cant see any concievable way for a relay to get only the events required for a single account to have a view of its follower feed (and replies) without cooperation on the part of every PDS on the network
if you want privacy, posting unencrypted things on a protocol that is inherently open to the public is not a very good idea
brave.com/blog/boomera...
brave.com/blog/boomera...
Why? 👇
Why? 👇
- Telegram leaks more metadata
- Telegram group chats are not encrypted
- TG defaults to unencrypted 1:1 chats, which is sus and dumb
- the Signal protocol has been well-tested and examined thoroughly by public researchers
- Telegram leaks more metadata
- Telegram group chats are not encrypted
- TG defaults to unencrypted 1:1 chats, which is sus and dumb
- the Signal protocol has been well-tested and examined thoroughly by public researchers
In our first post, we share our current technical implementation of public blocks and some possibilities for more privacy preserving implementations — an area of active research and experimentation.
https://atproto.com/blog/block-implementation
In our first post, we share our current technical implementation of public blocks and some possibilities for more privacy preserving implementations — an area of active research and experimentation.
https://atproto.com/blog/block-implementation