#privacy-protocol
That’s what happens when your data privacy protocol is “alpha man vibes” and nothing else lol. Hope he gets sued into oblivion.
EXCLUSIVE: Andrew Tate's online university 'The Real World' has been hacked.

Hundreds of thousands of private email addresses, usernames, as well as public & private chat logs were obtained by hackers.
www.dailydot.com/debug/andrew...
EXCLUSIVE: Hackers breach Andrew Tate's online university, leak data on 800,000 users
The hacked data includes roughly 325,000 users 'private email addresses
www.dailydot.com
November 21, 2024 at 10:17 PM
Warm Welcome to all followers on W

👌 User friendly
🔓 Open source AT Protocol
🔒 Privacy preserving
🧑‍🤝‍🧑 Humans only / No bots
And 🇪🇺 European!
June 17, 2026 at 4:03 PM
The idea of introducing a public web interface before a robust protocol for privacy sure as fuck is a choice, huh y'all?
bsky.app Bluesky @bsky.app · Nov 16
As a reminder, Bluesky is a public social network, so your posts, likes, etc. have always been publicly accessible through the API.

We designed Bluesky with the openness of the internet in mind. You can think of your profile as a blog on the internet.

For more on data privacy, read our user FAQ:
Bluesky User FAQ
Welcome to the Bluesky beta app! This is a user guide that answers some common questions.
blueskyweb.xyz
November 17, 2023 at 4:12 AM
DMs on Bluesky will not be "end-to-end encrypted" until we are able to do some more protocol work.

We have very careful access controls within our systems.

If you're extremely privacy conscious, I'd recommend using Bluesky DMs to share your Signal accounts!
May 22, 2024 at 8:29 PM
lists and blocks being public has always been a red flag around the privacy concerns on the protocol.
December 1, 2024 at 12:46 PM
Nobel laureate Maria Ressa advocates the “matrix protocol” (encrypted platforms with data privacy) for the future of truthful information. It counters the “inshitification” of the internet which is destroying democracies worldwide.
September 1, 2025 at 3:50 AM
I'm still pretty upset that privacy features didn't make it into the protocol level before federation released.

I feel like that's a big, big miss for this. The protocol still assumes everything is public, and that's going to be a problem.
bsky.app Bluesky @bsky.app · Feb 22
Today, we’re excited to announce that the Bluesky network is federating, or opening up in a way that allows you to host your own data!

Read more here for how this will affect your experience on Bluesky (in short: it won’t) and why this matters. 

bsky.social/about/blog/0...
Bluesky: An Open Social Web - Bluesky
Today, we’re excited to announce that the Bluesky network is federating, or opening up in a way that allows you to host your own data.
bsky.social
February 22, 2024 at 8:00 PM
It's planned, but there's a lot they have to add first. DMs and privacy sound hard to do in open clients.
2023 Protocol Roadmap | AT Protocol
This post lays out the current AT Protocol development plan through the end of 2023
atproto.com
January 9, 2024 at 11:59 PM
> deliberately build website around 100% transparent protocol

> condescendingly dunk on users asking for privacy controls, because "the protocol"

> perform all moderation actions openly on the protocol

> get buttmad at users for viewing/discussing moderation actions taken openly on the protocol
what a neat little account i hope bsky doesn't ban it!
May 9, 2026 at 9:15 PM
Today is the day! If you’re interested in community privacy and our approach to private data come on by at 11:30
Community privacy in a decentralized network
How we can build a community that is on ATproto with content that can be contained to users within their community boundary, a form of privacy without forcing us completely off the protocol. Rather th...
atmo.rsvp
March 29, 2026 at 2:51 PM
If anything, activists and people with privacy concerns should see this story as proof that even the Trump admin thinks Signal is more secure than any other messaging service. That's why they're using it. It's still not a SCIF. It's still not "protocol." But the story here is not really about Signal
March 25, 2025 at 2:27 PM
that's why we don't have any privacy settings to show only to a certain person -- until there are private systems in the protocol, posts are public
November 17, 2023 at 10:50 PM
You need to offer privacy settings to your users as basic safety protocol. You don’t know who may be in danger otherwise.
November 16, 2023 at 5:23 PM
another thing: privacy is mutually exclusive with bsky's design where the things are hinged on being public

if you want privacy, posting unencrypted things on a protocol that is inherently open to the public is not a very good idea
dark.ski Dark @dark.ski · Oct 30
my biggest concern with bluesky's federation models are the relays

as of right now i cant see any concievable way for a relay to get only the events required for a single account to have a view of its follower feed (and replies) without cooperation on the part of every PDS on the network
October 30, 2024 at 1:11 AM
Developed by @brave.com ‘Boomerang: A Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Verifiable Incentive Protocol’

brave.com/blog/boomera...
Boomerang: A Decentralised Privacy-Preserving Verifiable Incentive Protocol | Brave
Brave Research introduces Boomerang, a privacy-preserving protocol that decentralizes Brave Rewards while enabling verifiable ad interactions. Users can earn rewards anonymously through cryptographic ...
brave.com
November 20, 2024 at 8:14 PM
Technically, in Europe at least, it would be possible for the state to provide this kind of service in a relatively unintrusive way with a protocol that maintains user privacy on both parties (we have free digital identities services operated as public services) still hard. In the US? Omg.
April 15, 2026 at 11:05 AM
When we talk about the problems with Bluetooth-enabled physical trackers, we usually talk about AirTags, but let us save some rage for Tile, powered by this paper discussing Tile's privacy, security, and accountability problems: arxiv.org/abs/2510.003...
Security and Privacy Analysis of Tile's Location Tracking Protocol
We conduct the first comprehensive security analysis of Tile, the second most popular crowd-sourced location-tracking service behind Apple's AirTags. We identify several exploitable vulnerabilities an...
arxiv.org
March 2, 2026 at 9:28 PM
🧵 I've been experimenting with combining local-first software and the AT Protocol (atproto) to play with the design space of apps that live at both ends of the privacy spectrum - maximally private AND maximally public, without some of the downsides of the modern web. 

Why? 👇
April 22, 2025 at 4:30 PM
"Bluesky, once merely seen as another Twitter alternative, has evolved into something far more significant, the flagship application for an emerging ecosystem built on its AT Protocol with promises to fundamentally reshape our relationship with social media." www.forbes.com/sites/damion...
Blue Skies Ahead: Social Media's Quiet User Revolution
In a digital landscape increasingly defined by user concerns over privacy and control, a quiet revolution is taking shape.
www.forbes.com
April 3, 2025 at 4:11 AM
Telegram is inferior to Signal in terms of privacy:

- Telegram leaks more metadata
- Telegram group chats are not encrypted
- TG defaults to unencrypted 1:1 chats, which is sus and dumb
- the Signal protocol has been well-tested and examined thoroughly by public researchers
May 23, 2024 at 1:27 AM
Unfortunately they’ve always been public, that’s just how the AT Protocol works. Here’s my statement on the matter:
October 21, 2023 at 9:52 AM
WebRTC is a peer-to-peer communications protocol for web sites and therefore causes numerous privacy issues through making direct connections between participants. By default our Vanadium browser disables the peer-to-peer aspect by only using server-based (proxied) connections.
June 3, 2025 at 3:58 PM
Thinking about it Bluesky and AT Protocol is sort of a demonstration that security =/ privacy
December 15, 2024 at 7:14 PM
✨ ✍️ New: We have a developer blog now!

In our first post, we share our current technical implementation of public blocks and some possibilities for more privacy preserving implementations — an area of active research and experimentation.

https://atproto.com/blog/block-implementation
Why are blocks on Bluesky public? | AT Protocol
The technical implementation of public blocks and some possibilities for more privacy preserving block implementations — an area of active research and experimentation.
atproto.com
June 8, 2023 at 6:35 PM