#subd
LightNews LightNews
kosh3d.bsky.social
Streaming some good old subd modeling 📺 www.twitch.tv/elden_owl

[ #twitch #livestream #3dmodeling #3d #hardsurface #subd ]
November 4, 2026 at 6:54 PM
bbmercy.swordofmoonlight.com
and some in-progress shots. this is my first time doing subD in blender. it wasn't too bad! fairly painless. just time consuming. final optimized model came up to about 12k verts
October 30, 2026 at 2:09 PM
drewhamm5.bsky.social
And that’s yet another reason why Minnesota is the best.
TIME OFF WORK TO VOTE You have a right to take time off work to vote without losing your pay, personal leave, or vacation time. • Your employer must pay you for the time you need to vote, if it falls within your scheduled work time. Your employer cannot require you to use personal leave or vacation time (see Minnesota Statutes 204C.04 and 204C.08 subd. 1d). • Take only as much time as you need to vote and go to work. • Your employer cannot directly or indirectly refuse, limit, or interfere with this right, including what time you choose to vote. • Your employer can ask that you tell them when you will be gone, and ask that employees coordinate their absences to minimize workplace disruptions. • You have the right to time off work to vote in all state and federal elections, and in all regularly scheduled local elections.
November 3, 2026 at 9:18 PM
robertstewart.io
Either way, it'll likely go to a recount. MN provides for a publicly funded recount if requested and the margin is less than 0.25%, and this would be about 0.15%.

204C.35 subd. 1(b)(2)
November 4, 2026 at 7:27 AM
herebedragonsss.bsky.social
The stiff pose is for rigging purposes, and of course she's missing a lot of detail like wings, mouth interior, horns, and etc. I have a bit more cleanup to do on her body mesh, but very interested to see how she moves!

Also, there's no Subd on this; I retopologized at this resolution by hand :'D
October 28, 2026 at 9:53 PM
sundancer.metalhead.club.ap.brid.gy
Why do I worry about viewer numbers when I stream? I have less than 500 followers on YT and not even half that on twitch but usually around 20 viewers when streaming on twitch. So almost 10%

And then I just looked at someone streaming on YouTube. He has more than 80.000 subd and only 30 people […]
Original post on metalhead.club
metalhead.club
November 3, 2026 at 9:14 PM
danielsuitor.com
Regarding preemption, the COA did not buy the City's argument that state building code preempts Right to Repair. The Court finds that nothing in ROR evades permitting requirements. Repairs requiring a permit still need a permit, but building code allows many "ordinary repairs" which ROR could cover
The city argues that the proposed ordinance is expressly preempted by statutory language providing that “[a] municipality must not by ordinance, or through development agreement, require [1] building code provisions [2] regulating components or systems of any structure that are [3] different from any provision of the State Building Code.” Minn. Stat. § 326B.121, subd. 2(c) (2024); see also City of Morris, 749 N.W.2d at 7 (interpreting this language in three parts).8 In considering the express preemption by the State Building Code, the supreme court has explained that “if the subject of the regulation is included within the State Building Code, it is a ‘building code’ regulation” and that “any difference from the State Building Code is prohibited,” including “a provision that is merely additional and complementary to a provision in the State Building Code.” City of Morris, 749 N.W.2d at 8, 10. We agree with Safe Homes that the proposed ordinance does not attempt to alter the requirements of the State Building Code. Nothing in the ordinance impacts the permitting requirements set forth in the State Building Code. The city’s interpretation of the proposed ordinance asks us to add words to it, which we cannot do. See Walsh v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 851 N.W.2d 598, 604 (Minn. 2014) (applying principle of statutory construction that precludes adding words to unambiguous statutes); Chanhassen Ests. Residents Ass’n v. City of Chanhassen, 342 N.W.2d 335, 339 n.3 (Minn. 1984) (“Ordinances are construed according to the recognized principles of statutory construction.”). The ordinance, if adopted, may give rise to questions as to how permits will be obtained when required for repairs pursued by a tenant, but we do not read the ordinance to allow required repairs to proceed without a permit, if required under the State Building Code, or otherwise alter permitting processes or requirements set forth in the State Building Code. And, as Safe Homes notes, required repairs will not need a permit if they are “ordinary repairs to structures.” Minn. R. 1300.0120, subp. 6 (2025).9 For these reasons, we reject the city’s express preemption arguments. 9Minn. R. 1300.0120, subp. 6, provides:
November 2, 2026 at 4:26 PM
conkrete.bsky.social
the .fbx file format actually does support creased mesh geometry, but only if you export it from Maya or 3ds max into other platforms. you can import the meshes into rhino and convert them to subd to retain the crease info, but the rhino fbx exporter is bugged and doesn't write crease data
October 29, 2026 at 4:42 AM
danielsuitor.com
The Court finds no conflict preemption between ROR and
Minn. Stat. § 504B.185, which governs the process for city inspections of rental property. COA finds that these are different laws for different scenarios. Where have we heard that before?
By its express terms, section 504B.185 applies when a request for an inspection is made by “a residential tenant, a housing-related neighborhood organization with the written permission of a residential tenant, or, if a residential building is unoccupied, by a housing-related neighborhood organization.” Minn. Stat. § 504B.185, subd. 1. After the inspection is completed “under subdivision 1,” the statute requires notice of violations found and a reasonable time to correct the violations. Id., subd. 2. Section 504B.185 thus provides a procedure through which a tenant or neighborhood organization may request an inspection and governs the results of such an inspection. The proposed ordinance, by contrast, requires a landlord to “arrange for” an inspection if the landlord disputes whether a repair that a tenant intends to have completed is required, and provides that, if “the inspection confirms that repair is required, or if an inspection does not occur within 30 days of the landlord’s written notice of dispute, the tenant retains the right to initiate the repair.” Given the different context in which an inspection arises under the proposed ordinance, we conclude that the proposed ordinance does not permit what section 504B.185 forbids or prohibit what the statute expressly allows. Instead, the proposed ordinance appears to be “additional and complementary to or in aid and furtherance of” the remedies 15 provided by the landlord-tenant statutes. Graco, 937 N.W.2d at 760. We therefore reject the city’s argument that the proposed ordinance would conflict with section 504B.185. The city asserts that “[t]he Proposed Ordinance purports to override [section 504B.185], instead providing the Building Official only 30 days to inspect the rental unit at issue and the landlord an inflexible 14 days to schedule the repair.” Safe Homes counters that section 504B.185 “does not forbid a municipality from adopting a more specific timeline within the range ‘reasonable’ already permits”; that the 14-day repair period mirrors that afforded in a rent-escrow action under Minn. Stat. § 504B.385, subd. 1(c) (2024); and that section 504B.185 and the proposed ordinance are “at most, cumulative remedies addressing the same general subject, not irreconcilable ones.” We agree with Safe Homes that there is no conflict. The memo next claims that the 14-day notice period in Right to Repair conflicts with Minn. Stat. § 504B.185's requirement that municipalities provide a landlord with "A reasonable period of time . . . to correct the violations." 6/14 On top of this mortal wound, the proposed-ordinance is also irreconcilable with other areas of existing state law. For example, under Minnesota Statutes section § 504B.185 (2026), a landlord has a “reasonable period of time” to repair code violations. However, under the proposed-ordinance, the landlord has an inflexible 14 days to schedule the repair, and the Building Official only has 30 days to inspect a rental unit. And yet, these rigid- timelines do not exist in state law. These differences in timelines between the proposed-ordinance and state law create a potenually unlawful-conflict between the laws. At the state level, what is a “reasonable period of time” depends on the violation. For instance, a missing fire alarm, a window that will not stay open, or an unstable deck should be remedied immediately. But it may be reasonable for exterior painting repair or a roof to be repaired in 30 days or more. Under the Page | 3 ordinance, the repair for the code-violation must only be scheduled within 14 days, so the ordinance both allows serious major repairs to take longer to repair, than the Building Official deems reasonable, and may also require general maintenance to be completed in a time that is quicker than what is reasonable, because the repair does not pose any immediate safety hazard. The proposed ordinance is simultaneously stricter and more lenient than the existing Building Code, which is likely an unlawful conflict between the proposed-ordinance and state law. ALT 504B.185 INSPECTION; NOTICE. Subdivision 1.Who may request. If requested by a residential tenant, a housing-related neighborhood organization with the written permission of a residential tenant, or, if a residential building is unoccupied, by a housing-related neig…
November 2, 2026 at 4:29 PM
maxhailperin.bsky.social
The only pole that matters ... is the one that a somewhat odd subdivision of the Minnesota Statutes calls for. www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cit...
Subd. 1c.Display of flag. Upon their arrival at the polling place on the day of election, the election judges shall cause the national flag to be displayed on a suitable staff at the entrance to the polling place. The flag shall be displayed continuously during the hours of voting and the election judges shall attest to that fact by signing the flag certification statement on the precinct summary statement. The election judges shall receive no compensation for any time during which they intentionally fail to display the flag as required by this subdivision. photo of voting place with flag displayed at entrance
November 1, 2026 at 11:01 PM
arlinghausfamily.com
You will see people posting, “But he didn’t vote, so what law did he break?

This one:
MSA 204C.14 subd. 1(a) – Election Day Activities, Polling Place Activities, Unlawful Voting:

Minnesota law states:
October 29, 2026 at 1:31 PM
citizenptnewsmn.bsky.social
The Oakdale council has sparked controversy by voting to close part of their meeting to discuss a contentious water permit case with the DNR—what's really at stake?

Click to read more!

#MN #CitizenPortal #CivicDiscourse #PublicTransparency #WaterManagement #MinnesotaCouncil
Oakdale council votes to close meeting for attorney–client discussion on contested DNR water-permit matter
Council moved into executive session under Minnesota Statute 13D.05, subd. 3(b) to discuss a pending contested case with the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources regarding amendments to the city's water appropriation permit; the motion passed after one council member (the mayor) announced he would vote no.
citizenportal.ai
October 30, 2026 at 7:18 PM
jk9.bsky.social
Michelle Gross / CUAPB is sending out this letter, which carries IMO a strange and wrong claim. I'm not an expert, but I've searched and read about CAHOOTS across several years. I have never seen a claim that they compromised mental health response.

CAHOOTS was *started* by a mental health clinic
Image of a letter on CUAPB letterhead saying: (OCR'd Text) RE: Behavioral Crisis Response Dear City Council Members: In 2021, our organization wrote and worked successfully with the Minnesota legislature to pass Travis' Law (MN Stat. 403.03, subd. 1(b)) which requires 911 call centers-in this case, the city's MECC-to deflect most mental health crisis calls to mental health crisis response teams. We have a strong interest in the discussions happening around the future of behavioral crisis response in the city. We are deeply concerned that the mayor's proposal to transition from a Behavioral Crisis Response (BCR) model to a Mobile Crisis Response (MCR) model will detract from and reduce resources for the important work of providing care to vulnerable people in mental health crisis. Under MN Stat. 256B.0624, mental health crisis teams must be led by mental health professionals and made up of mental health practitioners and certified peer counselors. The model the mayor seems to be advocating for is the CAHOOTS-type model (out of Eugene, Oregon) that utilizes outreach workers to address "livability" issues. This model does not meet the stringent requirements defined in our state statute for mobile mental health crisis teams. Further, the city already operates other social service programs to address "livability" issues. The cost of $5.9 million per year for providing a professional and therapeutic mental health crisis response as defined by state statute and required under Travis' Law is a drop in the bucket compared to the $246.8 million proposed budget for the Minneapolis Police Department. Further, the utilization of these services saves money in both the short and long term while providing the most appropriate response for mental health crises. We are asking you not to conflate mental health crisis response services with social services and to ensure the continuation of a robust Behavioral Crisis Response (BCR) model.
October 29, 2026 at 9:12 PM
erichauge.bsky.social
504B was 1st & probably a bit more accessible: www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cit...
(Disclosure in lease/1st page sum total & advertising)

More recent 325D.44 Subd 1a looks stronger on advertising.

Fees still increasing: ~⬆25% in fee inquires this year vs. last. We need to just ban nonoptional fees.
October 22, 2026 at 7:08 PM
captainsplendid.bsky.social
Haha, yeah, that was my approach, and then I slap something on the size of grain of sand and ask myself "is 2 levels of subd enough???"

Thanks again for taking the time
October 20, 2026 at 5:08 PM
robear.bsky.social
Like this was one of the first custom greeble sections I made for it, at a time when I was planning for it to be lower detail, and now these bits are too faceted and I will have to update them. I should just make a subd-ready greeble library so I could increase the detail as needed, but I didn't.
October 20, 2026 at 5:06 PM
kicknews.bsky.social
#gooba_off #kicktimeout
dallalihoussem ⏳ 5m timeout by La7san02 (after 20s)
"med subd"
kick.com/gooba_off
October 18, 2026 at 11:21 PM
huanggoodman.bsky.social
{Markets Edge — M&A, Private Credit, and the Executive Tape}

European luxury brands lost €300 billion in market value during 2026, with LVMH's performance dragging the entire sector as demand in China remains subd…

The principals already moved.

↗ The room CMOs route through · huanggoodman.com/bra
Luxury erased €300B in market value. LVMH led the decline.
European luxury brands lost €300 billion in market value during 2026, with LVMH's performance dragging the entire sector as demand in China remains subdued.
www.pops4.com
October 18, 2026 at 7:30 PM
forum.infinityfree.com.web.brid.gy
New subdomain resolves to private IP and website is unreachable
### Website URL https://pellehnoor.42web.io ### Error Message DNS resolves to 10.10.34.36 and the website is unreachable ### Other Information I created pellehnoor.42web.io on October 15, 2026. The domain details show that it is Active, with directory htdocs and hosting IP 185.27.134.60. However, running nslookup pellehnoor.42web.io 8.8.8.8 returns 10.10.34.36 and 2001:4188:2:600:10:10:34:36. The website does not open. Please check whether the DNS records and hosting routing for this subdomain are configured correctly. Thank you.
forum.infinityfree.com
October 18, 2026 at 3:13 PM
dodgerfanla.bsky.social
Buddy, this is a misdemeanor (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6126, subd. (a).)

Lock her up
Exclusive | White House Press Secretary Katie Zacharia Didn’t Pass Bar Exam
Zacharia has previously referred to herself as a lawyer in public appearances.
www.wsj.com
October 15, 2026 at 5:53 PM
citizenptnewsid.bsky.social
The Montrose PUD just got a major facelift, with 76 acres retracted and a new subdivision of 346 lots approved—what does this mean for the future of the community?

Click to read more!

#PostFallsKootenaiCounty #ID #CitizenPortal #HomeownersAssociation #PostFallsHousing #UrbanPlanning
Commission approves Montrose PUD amendment and forwards 76‑acre subdivision to council
The Planning and Zoning Commission approved a PUD amendment to remove ~76 acres from the Montrose PUD (PUD A‑26‑2) and approved a concurrent subdivision (SUBD‑26‑4) to create 346 lots, with amended HOA wording to keep the properties in the existing Montrose homeowners association.
citizenportal.ai
October 17, 2026 at 12:23 PM
forthehollow.bsky.social
Blight
"I have been preparing for this day, Uzil RAAM. All I needed was a true leader. By my command, all Locust blights will march upon Sera." —Queen Myrrah[1] The Blight was the largest organizational subd...
gearsofwar.fandom.com
October 16, 2026 at 7:20 AM
cydonianmilu.bsky.social
AI is subsidized heavily right now if you buy a subscription. For some reason people that use AI for stuff like this quote the unsubsidized (or less subd) API price, not what they actually paid. Maybe it sounds cooler to them?

They actually paid a few K. But real energy costs are more like the 56k.
October 15, 2026 at 6:43 PM
grimalkina.bsky.social
This is exactly what I did with the measures I developed in Dev Success Lab projects because we wanted them to be openly available regardless of either journal publications (this also constrained what journals we subd to) + if the lab ever closed (I was correct about that! RIP)
October 14, 2026 at 7:45 PM
maxibillion.bsky.social
www.pacificjdm.com/import/usa/m...

not quite correct and it is much more complicated than that, sadly. i have wanted a kei truck for a very long time but they are just not practical to license here in MN
Minnesota Kei Truck Registration Guide
Minnesota defines mini trucks at Minn. Stat. § 169.011 subd. 40a and allows road use only on roadways designated by a local ordinance under § 169.045. Permits, insurance, equipment, and DVS titling.
www.pacificjdm.com
October 14, 2026 at 5:54 PM