YouTube video by Travis & Jonathan

The so-called “anti-weaponization” fund, which could enrich Jan. 6 rioters, is about “reparations,” Rep. Dan Meuser said, using a term associated with addressing historical racism.

The Justice Department signals a retreat from defending the blatantly corrupt scheme, which provoked vigorous objections from Republican lawmakers.

This can’t be real life! 🤬 How is this legal? 🤷🏽‍♂️ I’m so over this! 🤦🏽‍♂️ #SlushFund #J6 #DOJ #WeaponizationFund #ReeseWaters

YouTube video by The Damage Report

YouTube video by Aaron Parnas

Rep. Dan Meuser (R-Pennsylvania) used the word “reparations” on Newsmax to describe Trump’s $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund — a taxpayer-backed settlement fund for people w…

Podcast Episode · Political Views TV · June 16 · 48m

Podcast Episode · Political Views TV · August 3 · 1h

A federal judge on Wednesday rejected a government watchdog's request for a court order temporarily blocking the Trump administration from forging ahead with a new $1.776 billion settlement fund for c...

The deal, laid out in a document signed by acting attorney general Todd Blanche, grants a commission broad authority to distribute the money, drawn from taxpayer dollars.

The ongoing legal battle surrounding President Donald Trump's controversial 'weaponization fund' has resurfaced in a Virginia court, drawing comparisons to the 1994 film 'Dumb and Dumber.' The case involves a proposed fund intended to compensate individuals claiming government targeting, such as those associated with the January 6th Capitol riot. Initially facing significant bipartisan backlash, Attorney General Todd Blanche declared the fund 'dead' during his confirmation hearing. However, the Department of Justice (DOJ) has now requested the court to dismiss the case, despite having previously left legal loopholes that could allow the fund to continue. During a segment on MS NOW's 'Money, Power, Politics,' host Stephanie Ruhle and legal analyst Fallon Gallagher discussed the situation, with Gallagher referencing the iconic 'Dumb and Dumber' movie quote: 'So you're telling me there's a chance? Are you saying there's a chance?' The analyst used this analogy to highlight the apparent contradiction in the DOJ's position, as the court had previously given the DOJ a 'get-out-of-jail-free card' in June by allowing them to file a declaration under penalty of perjury stating they would not pursue the fund. The DOJ failed to do so, yet they are now seeking to dismiss the case, which would remove the only legal obstacle to the fund's potential revival. The case has drawn significant attention as it underscores the complex legal and political dynamics surrounding Trump's administration's efforts to address claims of government overreach. The court's decision will likely have far-reaching implications for how such funds are handled in the future, particularly in the context of ongoing political tensions and legal challenges.

YouTube video by Strict Scrutiny

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche cleared his primary obstacle to becoming the nation's chief law enforcement officer Monday after agreeing to dismantle a