Topic

Meta, Nvidia resist AI slowdown

1m

Meta and Nvidia leaders said they did not want to slow the pace of artificial intelligence development, deepening a Silicon Valley split over calls for new regulation.

36%
Good. This bill contained provisions that would've endangered our rights for the sake of AI experimentation.

As tech leaders warn of AI's risks, Congress must not remove the few protections we have to hold companies accountable.
‘The bill is dead’: Crypto legislation collapses on Senate floor
Democrats said the legislation didn’t do enough to crack down on President Donald Trump’s potential conflicts of interest.
www.politico.com
September 15, 2026 at 11:33 PM
5%
Today, I'm calling to immediately press pause on the development of advanced AI while lawmakers and regulators put systems in place to keep people safe.
September 16, 2026 at 4:47 PM
9%
On Democracy Now!, I floated a new theory: AI companies really have unleashed a killer monster that has slipped their control. But plot twist - the monster is human. And it's the President of the United States.

@astra.bsky.social
@democracynow.org
September 16, 2026 at 4:06 PM
20%
Here's Former Google CEO Schmidt saying AI companies can't self-police or self-regulate.

www.noemamag.com/conceding-ai...
Conceding AI Danger Raises, Not Reduces, Public Anxiety | NOEMA
“Pace the frontier” or pull the plug?
www.noemamag.com
September 16, 2026 at 4:18 PM
3%
We've already seen that the recent calls by AI industry leaders to ‘pace the frontier’ are insufficient, and their suggestions that we must weaken antitrust protections in order to confront the AI threat are transparently self-serving.
September 16, 2026 at 4:47 PM
13%
As if they weren't bad enough, AI data centers — which Trump strongly supports — could drive a surge in "forever chemical" production.

And that's after Trump's EPA already approved new forever chemical pesticides and rolled back limits on them in our drinking water.

"Make America Healthy Again."
Research Warns of Surge in Cancer-Causing Forever Chemicals From AI Data Center Build-Out | Common Dreams
Experts warn of a global surge in PFAS production driven by AI and data centers.
www.commondreams.org
September 15, 2026 at 11:01 PM
9%
I have a hard time imagining any significant US AI regulation while Trump is president, but in the meantime people can discuss the possibilities and have things ready for 2029.
September 16, 2026 at 7:10 PM
3%
Frontier AI models are currently a dangerous technology without the safeguards needed to protect people from serious harm.

That's why we should immediately pause the development of advanced AI while lawmakers and regulators put systems in place to keep people safe.
September 16, 2026 at 4:47 PM
11%
nothing i see from the heads of ai companies suggests a meaningful slowdown

and full dismissal of slowdown talk from the trump admin

on @cnbctv18.bsky.social
September 16, 2026 at 2:19 PM
12%
this piece highlights three key points:
(1) trump admin actively opposes AI safety reg;
(2) zuck & others essentially say trust-but-don't-verify;
(3) the industry is in disarray in the face of public hatred of them/their opacity/their clear self-interest/their public disavowal of responsibility.
‘If you’re building Frankenstein, stop’: JD Vance dismisses calls for AI regulation
US vice-president’s comments come as former Anthropic researcher revisits recent claim AI could destroy humanity
www.theguardian.com
September 16, 2026 at 3:57 PM

Reposted by Ann Bartow

4%
The time to act on AI is yesterday.

I'm calling for an immediate pause on the development of advanced AI while lawmakers and regulators put systems in place to keep people safe.
September 16, 2026 at 6:10 PM
14%
I'm confused by Trump's position on the AI race with China. He proclaimed with great gusto yesterday that we will not "slow down" because we need to beat China. But he also supports selling more sophisticated chips to China that help them accelerate their AI capabilities. I don't get it.
September 16, 2026 at 12:17 AM
33%
And…Trump might be right! It is the job of the executive to enforce the law, including liability. In government, that means he might block this stunt if these guys realise they might go to jail. At Anthropic, that means it's Amodei's job to set priorities, eg more #devops fewer projects. #AILaunch
Donald Trump dismisses concerns about dangers of AI
The president called efforts to slow the development of artificial intelligence a "sick conspiracy," claiming they only serve China. Market leaders have warned of the dangers of the pace of the techno...
www.dw.com
September 16, 2026 at 4:52 AM
0%
AI environmental concerns build as lawmakers grapple with tech panic www.axios.com/2026/09/16/a...
AI environmental concerns build as lawmakers grapple with tech panic
Polling out today showed Americans also share existential concerns about AI.
www.axios.com
September 16, 2026 at 6:17 PM

Reposted by Simon Lester

3%
Lawmakers are expressing broader willingness to regulate AI development, but the path forward may not be a quick one. n.pr/4AhwL0U
Congress is under pressure to act on AI — here's what that could look like
Lawmakers are expressing broader willingness to regulate AI development, but the path forward may not be a quick one.
n.pr
September 16, 2026 at 7:01 PM
16%
We spoke to her for our AVs project. She should be first call for AI safety. But for the obvious reason that her framework is inconvenient for see-no-evil innovators.
September 16, 2026 at 12:21 PM
1%
When AI Developers Regulate Themselves marcwatkins.substack.com/p/when-ai-de...
When AI Developers Regulate Themselves
Safety & AI Regulation Should Include Present Harms, Not Just Future Ones
marcwatkins.substack.com
September 16, 2026 at 4:48 PM
5%
Working people are worried about their futures. We shouldn’t have to live in fear for our jobs or our lives because of AI.

That’s why 90% of Americans want REAL AI guardrails — to protect our jobs, rights and privacy.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/may/12/workers-ai-policy-unions
US workers overwhelmingly support union-backed policies on AI, poll says
Nine out of 10 workers express support for policies on artificial intelligence that labor unions may fight for
www.theguardian.com
September 16, 2026 at 2:10 PM

Reposted by Greg Linden

5%
If we held people personally and criminally liable for the "autonomous" actions of the AI systems they create and deploy, I bet the risky behavior would evaporate overnight.
September 15, 2026 at 11:45 PM
0%
Top AI companies are asking for supervision. Here's why Congress might not give it to them. www.politico.com/news/2026/09...
Top AI companies are asking for supervision. Here's why Congress might not give it to them.
As the artificial intelligence lobby warms to mandatory independent audits, critics warn of conflicts of interest and "regulatory capture."
www.politico.com
September 16, 2026 at 7:59 AM