Topic

Trump Bars Major News Outlets

1m

President Donald Trump barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House, prompting critics to say the move violated press freedoms and could face legal challenge.

26%
Trump's panicking about the widespread revulsion against his Arch, and is trying to cloak it in national security to jam it through or go around the normal approval process.

It's even more important to stop it now, as a test case of not letting him use "national security" to justify illegal acts.
September 20, 2026 at 12:32 PM
8%
KARL: Do you support Trump banning news organizations because he doesn't like what they're reporting?

SCALISE: Look, Biden removed the press credentials from 400 agencies

KARL: That's not true. 400 reporters who had credentials didn't reapply. They weren't banned from the WH. That did not happen.
September 20, 2026 at 2:08 PM
25%
CNN: We are banned from the White House but we will continue to bring the White House to you
BASH: The Wall Street Journal reports the president's top advisers are warning the Iran war could continue the rest of his term, until 2029. Is that what you think?

UN AMBASSADOR MIKE WALTZ: I think time is on the president's side

(Not a no!)
September 20, 2026 at 1:13 PM

Reposted by Steve Peers

13%
The law is that “Although the WH is not required to open its doors to the news media, once it establishes press facilities for credentialed journalists, it cannot deny access based on the content of a journalist’s coverage.” That's exactly what Trump is doing. joycevance.substack.com/p/its-a-nice...
It’s a Nice First Amendment You’ve Got There…
Mea culpa for the long post on a Saturday night, but read on and see if you don’t agree that it’s essential.
joycevance.substack.com
September 20, 2026 at 3:26 AM
0%
Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the 1st amendment, the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House

Yeah, right Senator.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/whi...
Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House
The Wyoming senator’s comments come after reporters from MS NOW, Politico and CNN were barred from entering White House grounds.
www.nbcnews.com
September 20, 2026 at 5:04 PM
25%
The networks banned from the White House do not have to choose to have representatives from the Trump administration on their political talk shows this morning

But they will because they love lying liars
September 20, 2026 at 12:52 PM
14%
Step 1: host invites degenerate liar to come onto show
Step 2: host asks a question, lets degenerate liar lie for a few minutes
Step 3: host pushes back on a few of the lies
Step 4: host feels great about mild push back, degenerate liar feels great about the lies

Rest of US: our Elites are absurd
KARL: Do you support Trump banning news organizations because he doesn't like what they're reporting?

SCALISE: Look, Biden removed the press credentials from 400 agencies

KARL: That's not true. 400 reporters who had credentials didn't reapply. They weren't banned from the WH. That did not happen.
September 20, 2026 at 3:31 PM
21%
The White House Press Corps should just boycott the White House and stop covering Trump in solidarity with their colleagues. He would wither without any media attention.
September 20, 2026 at 1:25 AM
25%
More NYT: too bad for them
Journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico were denied entry to the White House on Saturday. First Amendment experts condemned President Trump’s ban on the news outlets as unconstitutional. www.nytimes.com/live/2026/09...
September 19, 2026 at 9:51 PM
31%
solidarity isn’t a statement. it’s an action. we’ll see who’s genuinely on team free press by attendance at the next White House briefing.
News Outlets Express Solidarity After Trump Bars Some Reporters (Gift Article)
Some Democrats said President Trump’s ban was an attempt to control the press and distract voters as Republicans face deep challenges in the midterm elections.
www.nytimes.com
September 20, 2026 at 4:35 AM

Reposted by Nathan P. Kalmoe

5%
Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House
Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House
Amb. Mike Waltz told CNN's Dana Bash directly that he stands behind Trump's decision to ban her network in a heated CNN interview on Sunday. The post Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House first appeared on Mediaite.
dlvr.it
September 20, 2026 at 1:55 PM

Reposted by John McLaren

4%
The president banned reporters for asking questions. He can’t defend his record. And if you can’t take the heat, then get out of the kitchen.
September 19, 2026 at 11:42 PM
5%
Fox News is now defending CNN, which is obviously the smart thing to do. Even they realize the tides always turn. They said, “Don’t ban them. Or one day, they’ll ban us.” The MAGA movement is really falling apart.
September 19, 2026 at 10:09 PM
26%
POLITICO, MS NOW and CNN journalists denied access to White House after Trump media ban

www.politico.com/news/2026/09...
POLITICO, MS NOW and CNN journalists denied access to White House after Trump media ban
Reporters with the outlets were turned away when they arrived at the gate Saturday.
www.politico.com
September 19, 2026 at 9:56 PM

Reposted by Victor Asal

8%
The press is supposed to be able to scrutinize the government, EVEN when the president hates the coverage.
That’s Freedom of the Press!
Yesterday, Tapper made it clear that journalists aren’t simply going to stop doing their jobs because the president wants them gone.
That matters.
Well done, Jake!
September 19, 2026 at 8:33 PM
11%
This will form part of a defensive perimeter denying enemies access to Washington, to be known as the
MAGA No Line.
Trump's panicking about the widespread revulsion against his Arch, and is trying to cloak it in national security to jam it through or go around the normal approval process.

It's even more important to stop it now, as a test case of not letting him use "national security" to justify illegal acts.
September 20, 2026 at 12:44 PM
23%
We can call it what it is - Fascism!
The First Amendment does not care whether or not a president likes his media coverage.

This overreach is unlawful and unconstitutional. We will continue to support and fight for the free press and journalists. ⬇️
September 20, 2026 at 9:16 AM
32%
🎶Oh that Epstein jangle keep runnin’ along (not)🎶…,

US news outlets say journalists denied access to White House in stark escalation by Trump

www.irishtimes.com/world/us/202...
US news outlets say journalists denied access to White House in stark escalation by Trump
Move criticised as an intensifying of US president’s attacks on press freedoms ahead of midterm elections
www.irishtimes.com
September 19, 2026 at 8:11 PM

Reposted by David Johnson

1%
“The response to Trump’s attacks on these outlets should be for every news outlet to boycott the Trump White House. They don’t need to stand there to do their reporting. See how Trump likes it when no legitimate news outlet shows up for his tantrums and lies.”
www.americaamerica.news/p/is-trump-c...
Is Trump Collapsing?
A Saturday Prompt
www.americaamerica.news
September 19, 2026 at 10:25 PM

Reposted by Gerald Friedman

4%
“The more pressing question is whether legacy news organizations will finally dedicate aggressive daily coverage to Trump’s obvious cognitive decline and the danger it’s causing to our country and the world.”
www.americaamerica.news/p/is-trump-c...
Is Trump Collapsing?
A Saturday Prompt
www.americaamerica.news
September 19, 2026 at 8:55 PM