Topic

Trump Bars Three News Outlets

9m

President Donald Trump barred CNN, MS NOW and Politico from the White House after criticizing their coverage, and the outlets invoked First Amendment concerns.

Reposted by David Darmofal

2%
Studiously impartial C-SPAN calls for the Trump administration to immediately restore White House access to the journalists of CNN, MSNOW and Politico.
September 20, 2026 at 8:03 PM
1%
White House Press Corps President (And Fox Anchor): Trump Banning Outlets “Violates The First Amendment”

www.joemygod.com/2026/09/whit...
White House Press Corps President (And Fox Anchor): Trump Banning Outlets “Violates The First Amendment”
“Today’s action revoking access for journalists from CNN, POLITICO, and MSNOW violates the First Amendment. “The implications extend beyond these organizations: a standard used to excl…
www.joemygod.com
September 20, 2026 at 7:00 PM
0%
Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the 1st amendment, the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House

Yeah, right Senator.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/whi...
Sen. John Barrasso says Trump isn’t violating the Constitution by banning reporters from the White House
The Wyoming senator’s comments come after reporters from MS NOW, Politico and CNN were barred from entering White House grounds.
www.nbcnews.com
September 20, 2026 at 5:04 PM
14%
Step 1: host invites degenerate liar to come onto show
Step 2: host asks a question, lets degenerate liar lie for a few minutes
Step 3: host pushes back on a few of the lies
Step 4: host feels great about mild push back, degenerate liar feels great about the lies

Rest of US: our Elites are absurd
KARL: Do you support Trump banning news organizations because he doesn't like what they're reporting?

SCALISE: Look, Biden removed the press credentials from 400 agencies

KARL: That's not true. 400 reporters who had credentials didn't reapply. They weren't banned from the WH. That did not happen.
September 20, 2026 at 3:31 PM

Reposted by Daxton R. Stewart

5%
Welker: "Do you agree with the president's ban [of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico]?"

Barrasso: "We all respect and value the freedom of the press; it's in the Constitution…The press has an obligation to report fairly, and the president doesn't see it happening that way."
September 20, 2026 at 2:20 PM
8%
KARL: Do you support Trump banning news organizations because he doesn't like what they're reporting?

SCALISE: Look, Biden removed the press credentials from 400 agencies

KARL: That's not true. 400 reporters who had credentials didn't reapply. They weren't banned from the WH. That did not happen.
September 20, 2026 at 2:08 PM

Reposted by Nathan P. Kalmoe

5%
Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House
Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House
Amb. Mike Waltz told CNN's Dana Bash directly that he stands behind Trump's decision to ban her network in a heated CNN interview on Sunday. The post Trump’s UN Ambassador Battles CNN’s Dana Bash in Heated Skirmish — Tells Her Trump Was ‘Spot On’ in Banning Her Network from White House first appeared on Mediaite.
dlvr.it
September 20, 2026 at 1:55 PM
0%
The Company Trump Can’t Ignore www.politico.com/news/magazin...
The Company Trump Can’t Ignore
The president wanted to unleash AI. Then came Anthropic.
www.politico.com
September 20, 2026 at 1:47 PM
25%
CNN: We are banned from the White House but we will continue to bring the White House to you
BASH: The Wall Street Journal reports the president's top advisers are warning the Iran war could continue the rest of his term, until 2029. Is that what you think?

UN AMBASSADOR MIKE WALTZ: I think time is on the president's side

(Not a no!)
September 20, 2026 at 1:13 PM
25%
The networks banned from the White House do not have to choose to have representatives from the Trump administration on their political talk shows this morning

But they will because they love lying liars
September 20, 2026 at 12:52 PM
11%
This will form part of a defensive perimeter denying enemies access to Washington, to be known as the
MAGA No Line.
Trump's panicking about the widespread revulsion against his Arch, and is trying to cloak it in national security to jam it through or go around the normal approval process.

It's even more important to stop it now, as a test case of not letting him use "national security" to justify illegal acts.
September 20, 2026 at 12:44 PM
26%
Trump's panicking about the widespread revulsion against his Arch, and is trying to cloak it in national security to jam it through or go around the normal approval process.

It's even more important to stop it now, as a test case of not letting him use "national security" to justify illegal acts.
September 20, 2026 at 12:32 PM
23%
We can call it what it is - Fascism!
The First Amendment does not care whether or not a president likes his media coverage.

This overreach is unlawful and unconstitutional. We will continue to support and fight for the free press and journalists. ⬇️
September 20, 2026 at 9:16 AM

Reposted by Kent Johnson

1%
The fact all news organizations haven’t immediately left the White House in solidarity is all you need to know about these supposed journalists

You can get the same exact info from his tweets and avoid the smell

Win win really
September 20, 2026 at 8:27 AM

Reposted by Timothy D. McBride

0%
White House faces mounting legal backlash after barring journalists from CNN, MS NOW & Politico. The outlets’ workspaces sat empty as press groups and First Amendment experts condemned the ban & called for journalists’ access to be restored.
www.nbcnews.com/politics/whi...
White House faces mounting legal backlash after barring journalists from CNN, MS NOW and Politico
The outlets’ workspaces sat empty as press groups and First Amendment experts condemned the ban and called for journalists’ access to be restored.
www.nbcnews.com
September 20, 2026 at 7:12 AM
0%
I see his point about CNN not being very good at news. What is new about this. Everyone has known this since 2000.
September 20, 2026 at 5:52 AM
31%
solidarity isn’t a statement. it’s an action. we’ll see who’s genuinely on team free press by attendance at the next White House briefing.
News Outlets Express Solidarity After Trump Bars Some Reporters (Gift Article)
Some Democrats said President Trump’s ban was an attempt to control the press and distract voters as Republicans face deep challenges in the midterm elections.
www.nytimes.com
September 20, 2026 at 4:35 AM

Reposted by Steve Peers

13%
The law is that “Although the WH is not required to open its doors to the news media, once it establishes press facilities for credentialed journalists, it cannot deny access based on the content of a journalist’s coverage.” That's exactly what Trump is doing. joycevance.substack.com/p/its-a-nice...
It’s a Nice First Amendment You’ve Got There…
Mea culpa for the long post on a Saturday night, but read on and see if you don’t agree that it’s essential.
joycevance.substack.com
September 20, 2026 at 3:26 AM
21%
The White House Press Corps should just boycott the White House and stop covering Trump in solidarity with their colleagues. He would wither without any media attention.
September 20, 2026 at 1:25 AM
0%
Trump Faced Loss After Loss.
He Then Turned to a Familiar Target: The Press
www.nytimes.com/2026/09/19/u...
Trump Faced Loss After Loss. He Then Turned to a Familiar Target: The Press.
The president’s ban of three media outlets from the White House fits a pattern of using the apparatus of government to crack down on his perceived enemies.
www.nytimes.com
September 20, 2026 at 12:29 AM