yo dawg I trained your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs
February 17, 2025 at 7:56 PM
yo dawg I trained your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs and your LLMs on your LLMs
For the folks in the back:
OCR predates LLMs.
HTR software predates LLMs.
Digital Humanities predates LLMs.
Grammar and spell checkers predate LLMs.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE PLAGIARISM MACHINES.
OCR predates LLMs.
HTR software predates LLMs.
Digital Humanities predates LLMs.
Grammar and spell checkers predate LLMs.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE PLAGIARISM MACHINES.
January 30, 2026 at 2:55 AM
For the folks in the back:
OCR predates LLMs.
HTR software predates LLMs.
Digital Humanities predates LLMs.
Grammar and spell checkers predate LLMs.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE PLAGIARISM MACHINES.
OCR predates LLMs.
HTR software predates LLMs.
Digital Humanities predates LLMs.
Grammar and spell checkers predate LLMs.
YOU DO NOT NEED THE PLAGIARISM MACHINES.
7. "some people find LLMs useful" is a different claim than any of the following:
a) LLMs are good at doing the things people use them for
b) LLMs are well suited to the tasks for which they are advertised
c) LLMs "can do" something
a) LLMs are good at doing the things people use them for
b) LLMs are well suited to the tasks for which they are advertised
c) LLMs "can do" something
September 21, 2026 at 10:54 PM
7. "some people find LLMs useful" is a different claim than any of the following:
a) LLMs are good at doing the things people use them for
b) LLMs are well suited to the tasks for which they are advertised
c) LLMs "can do" something
a) LLMs are good at doing the things people use them for
b) LLMs are well suited to the tasks for which they are advertised
c) LLMs "can do" something
LLMs will save literacy send tweet
November 11, 2025 at 6:57 PM
LLMs will save literacy send tweet
I'm an "A.i." abolitionist.
No consumer-facing LLMs or generative "A.i." in anything.
Sure, machine learning in science and a few other limited applications is fine.
But consumer-facing LLMs and generative "A.i." that are based on theft, push disinfo, and can be manipulated by billionaires?
No.
No consumer-facing LLMs or generative "A.i." in anything.
Sure, machine learning in science and a few other limited applications is fine.
But consumer-facing LLMs and generative "A.i." that are based on theft, push disinfo, and can be manipulated by billionaires?
No.
July 8, 2025 at 11:53 PM
I'm an "A.i." abolitionist.
No consumer-facing LLMs or generative "A.i." in anything.
Sure, machine learning in science and a few other limited applications is fine.
But consumer-facing LLMs and generative "A.i." that are based on theft, push disinfo, and can be manipulated by billionaires?
No.
No consumer-facing LLMs or generative "A.i." in anything.
Sure, machine learning in science and a few other limited applications is fine.
But consumer-facing LLMs and generative "A.i." that are based on theft, push disinfo, and can be manipulated by billionaires?
No.
You need to talk to the people in your life about what LLMs can and cannot do.
March 8, 2025 at 5:26 PM
You need to talk to the people in your life about what LLMs can and cannot do.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
December 2, 2025 at 4:13 PM
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
LLMs do not know things.
bro starts glowing when i dont give him enough attention
July 25, 2025 at 2:39 PM
bro starts glowing when i dont give him enough attention
I’ve played with LLMs a fair amount and noticed something that these studies that show using LLMs degrading intellectual performance may not be picking up: What if having pretty good critical thinking skills makes LLMs less appealing/satisfying to use in the first place?
October 28, 2025 at 2:44 PM
I’ve played with LLMs a fair amount and noticed something that these studies that show using LLMs degrading intellectual performance may not be picking up: What if having pretty good critical thinking skills makes LLMs less appealing/satisfying to use in the first place?
LLMs have caused everyone to lose it seriously
Generative language models aren’t research tools by themselves. You actually need to run statistical models that do computation instead of hallucinate replies based on previous discussion. There is peer reviewed research about how generative models hallucinate and are easily led by the prompter.
July 20, 2025 at 11:13 AM
LLMs have caused everyone to lose it seriously
LLMs are bad because it's unethical to force a computer to read so many reddit posts
October 19, 2024 at 6:52 PM
LLMs are bad because it's unethical to force a computer to read so many reddit posts
Also please feel free to fight in the comments about "pure LLMs" versus multimodal LLMs versus multimodal LLMs with tool use or whatever. I totally get all the caveats, but you also get what I mean.
September 27, 2026 at 2:45 AM
Also please feel free to fight in the comments about "pure LLMs" versus multimodal LLMs versus multimodal LLMs with tool use or whatever. I totally get all the caveats, but you also get what I mean.
my biggest pet peeve around LLMs is when people (usually those invested in its success) call it “intelligent”. it definitionally, how it functions on a base level, is not intelligent. the way LLMs are built, it can never hit real intelligence. it’s just predictive
April 17, 2026 at 5:29 PM
my biggest pet peeve around LLMs is when people (usually those invested in its success) call it “intelligent”. it definitionally, how it functions on a base level, is not intelligent. the way LLMs are built, it can never hit real intelligence. it’s just predictive
LLMs could never.
May 27, 2026 at 5:13 AM
LLMs could never.
Before LLMs nobody anthropomorphised the computers
September 25, 2026 at 9:35 AM
Before LLMs nobody anthropomorphised the computers
Once again, LLMs can’t believe reality is real.
December 9, 2025 at 12:06 AM
Once again, LLMs can’t believe reality is real.
LLMs hallucinating nonexistent software packages with plausible names leads to a new malware vulnerability: "slopsquatting."
LLMs can't stop making up software dependencies and sabotaging everything
: Hallucinated package names fuel 'slopsquatting'
www.theregister.com
April 12, 2025 at 10:31 PM
LLMs hallucinating nonexistent software packages with plausible names leads to a new malware vulnerability: "slopsquatting."
Stop uploading things to LLMs. ANY THINGS. ANY LLMs.
NEW: A large trove of Claude-generated documents have been exposed to the web and indexed by Google.
We reviewed what appear to be real medical records, the full names and phone numbers of school-aged children, and company documents marked for internal use only.
futurism.com/artificial-i...
We reviewed what appear to be real medical records, the full names and phone numbers of school-aged children, and company documents marked for internal use only.
futurism.com/artificial-i...
A Whole Bunch of People's Claude Chats Are Publicly Accessible Online, and There's Some Wildly Private Stuff in There
A trove of documents generated by Anthropic's Claude were indexed by Google. They included medical records and student information.
futurism.com
July 27, 2026 at 11:26 PM
Stop uploading things to LLMs. ANY THINGS. ANY LLMs.
the tech bros telling you LLMs are conscious don’t think women are people.
September 16, 2026 at 6:35 PM
the tech bros telling you LLMs are conscious don’t think women are people.
I think about this stock image a lot and how it presaged modern llms
September 9, 2025 at 6:24 PM
I think about this stock image a lot and how it presaged modern llms
The debate around GenAI and specifically around LLMs is interesting to watch.
A lot of people seem to be clustering towards one pole or the other ("LLMs are categorically evil" vs. "LLMs are the future of everything") — which is interesting because there's a huge middle ground to explore.
A lot of people seem to be clustering towards one pole or the other ("LLMs are categorically evil" vs. "LLMs are the future of everything") — which is interesting because there's a huge middle ground to explore.
April 26, 2025 at 7:37 PM
The debate around GenAI and specifically around LLMs is interesting to watch.
A lot of people seem to be clustering towards one pole or the other ("LLMs are categorically evil" vs. "LLMs are the future of everything") — which is interesting because there's a huge middle ground to explore.
A lot of people seem to be clustering towards one pole or the other ("LLMs are categorically evil" vs. "LLMs are the future of everything") — which is interesting because there's a huge middle ground to explore.
“You can’t ignore LLMs are good at code” sure but also Microsoft broke notepad this week.
February 12, 2026 at 4:58 PM
“You can’t ignore LLMs are good at code” sure but also Microsoft broke notepad this week.
as a girl with a PhD in natural language processing and machine learning it's actually offensive to me when you say "we don't know how LLMs work so they might be conscious"
I didn't spend 10 years in mines of academia to be told ignorance is morally equal knowledge.
We know exactly how LLMs work.
I didn't spend 10 years in mines of academia to be told ignorance is morally equal knowledge.
We know exactly how LLMs work.
October 4, 2025 at 10:23 PM
as a girl with a PhD in natural language processing and machine learning it's actually offensive to me when you say "we don't know how LLMs work so they might be conscious"
I didn't spend 10 years in mines of academia to be told ignorance is morally equal knowledge.
We know exactly how LLMs work.
I didn't spend 10 years in mines of academia to be told ignorance is morally equal knowledge.
We know exactly how LLMs work.
I think the shortest version of why LLMs are an anti education technology is that education is fundamentally about making shared context to understand ourselves, each other, and the world
And by design LLMs destroy shared context
And by design LLMs destroy shared context
November 23, 2025 at 12:57 PM
I think the shortest version of why LLMs are an anti education technology is that education is fundamentally about making shared context to understand ourselves, each other, and the world
And by design LLMs destroy shared context
And by design LLMs destroy shared context