#PostTest
LightNews LightNews
jaypsm.bsky.social
heyyyyy bskyyyyy
address

#StoryTest
#PostTest
#HashtagTest
#CaptionTest
#FeedTest
alter 3 image
September 30, 2026 at 10:21 AM
fungaldoc.bsky.social
Yup. For many tests, the best predictor of posttest probability is the pretest probability.
April 23, 2025 at 9:56 PM
jeffgreene.bsky.social
Participants randomly assigned to a "think first, then work with #GenAI" condition outperformed general-use GenAI and control conditions on a delayed posttest no-GenAI creativity task. General-use GenAI did better on immediate posttest w/GenAI assistance. (1/2) #PsychSciSky #AcademicSky #EduSky
Think First, ChatGPT Later: Guiding Human–AI Collaboration for Learning Gains in Independent Human Creativity - Educational Psychology Review
Educational Psychology Review - Generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT can boost creative performance, but do these boosts translate into learning gains? This study examined...
doi.org
April 21, 2026 at 12:01 PM
maitreya.bsky.social
We did a concept assessment pretest/posttest when I started teaching intro genetics, and, to our great horror, performance on the pop gen-y question decreased on the posttest! We hypothesized that before the class, students reasoned through the question, and after, they tried to pattern match HW :/
June 26, 2025 at 4:46 AM
ruben.the100.ci
Fadeout of cognitive training remains one of the more replicable
findings in psychology in this preregistered study of 300 preschool children. Well-done study with a 4 year follow up. The language gains either faded or the control group caught up.
journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....
Fig. 3. Effects of the intervention. In (a) are shown effects 7 months after the intervention; in (b) are shown interaction effects 7 months after the intervention. Models show the effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 1 posttest, with an interaction between expressive-language skills in the pretest and after the intervention. Standardized coefficients (with 95% confidence intervals) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable and the interaction where y-standardized values are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); the arrow with dotted lines shows nonsignificant regression. The interaction (Fig. 3b) is illustrated by the arrow from the black circle to expressive language in the posttest. **p < .01. Fig. 4. Long-term effects of the intervention on expressive-language skills. Model showing the effect of the intervention on expressive-language skills in the grade 4 posttest. Standardized coefficients (with 95% CIs) are shown, except for the intervention dummy variable where y-standardized values (equal to Cohen’s d) are indicated. Rectangles and circles contain observed variables and latent variables, respectively. Solid arrows point to significant regression or factor loadings (arrows from latent variables to their observed indicators); arrows with dotted lines show nonsignificant regression. **p < .01.
December 3, 2025 at 10:14 AM
mededportal.bsky.social
This workshop aims to enhance understanding of research design among novice health professions education researchers, addressing the limitations of the one-group pretest-posttest design & offering alternative approaches. #EditorsChoice #Medsky #MedEd
www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766...
Hands point to data on a clipboard. White text at the top reads "Moving Beyond Simplistic Research Design in Health Professions Education: What a One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design Will Not Prove."
June 2, 2025 at 5:42 PM
adastroworld.bsky.social
test posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest posttest postte
April 1, 2025 at 9:27 PM
boghuma.bsky.social
It has even now been studied in a clinical trial with demonstrated benefits on blood pressure and heart rate for these patients. It is also just an extra measure of care that reminds me of the humanity and compassion humans are capable of. Always makes me smile.
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC...
Effects of love glove application on vital signs for COVID‐19 patients in the intensive care unit
To evaluate the effects of love glove application on vital signs for COVID‐19 patients in the intensive care unit. A single‐group pretest‐posttest quasi‐experimental design was used. TREND Statement C...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
May 23, 2025 at 6:23 PM
dingdingpeng.the100.ci
One note just from looking at the abstract of the paper you linked: it sounds like the estimand of interest is "differences between groups in the amount of change from pre-test to post-test" that is *not* the same as the effect of group membership on the outcome at posttest,>
March 19, 2026 at 8:16 AM
ayetsg.com
posttest
December 9, 2024 at 8:37 AM
agjare.eurosky.social
Det einaste signifikante resultatet dei kunne hoste opp, var følgjande: Gutane i eksperimentgruppa hadde signifikant høgare score på ein av fire indikatorar på posttest samanlikna med pretest.

ALLE andre kombinasjonar av utval (gutar, jenter, alle) og indikatorar gav ikkje-signifikante resultat.
April 14, 2025 at 3:12 PM
mededportal.bsky.social
This ‪workshop aims to enhance understanding of research design among novice health professions education researchers, addressing the limitations of the one-group pretest-posttest design & offering alternative approaches. #Medsky #MedEd
www.mededportal.org/doi/10.15766...
Moving Beyond Simplistic Research Design in Health Professions Education: What a One-Group Pretest-Posttest Design Will Not Prove | MedEdPORTAL
Introduction Educational research presents unique study design challenges. Novice researchers in health professions education (HPE) frequently misuse the one-group pretest-posttest design, highlightin...
www.mededportal.org
May 20, 2025 at 5:47 PM
katherinezhoumd.bsky.social
#PostTest Q1️⃣ #TumorBoardTuesday
👉🏽#CME Eval 🔗 integrityce.com/TBTeval24
👉🏽ALL CME🔗 integrityce.com/TBT2024

🤔What percentage of pancreatic adenocarcinoma cases typically express Claudin 18.2?
1) 30%
2) 50%
3) 70%
4) 90%
February 5, 2025 at 2:03 AM
jbenmenachem.com
The appendices are laugh-out-loud funny -- ahh, so "testability" = text search hits for general quantitative terminology and causal inference keywords.
Table B.2: Testability terms: Categories 1–3. Category Subcategory Tier 1 (core) Tier 2 additions Category 1: Core Testing Terms — Direct references to testing, experimentation, and empirical trials. Base terms test, tests, tested, testing, testable, testability, retest, retested, retesting, pretest, pretested, posttest, posttested — Trial terms trial, trials — Experiment terms experiment, experiments, experimental, experimentally, experimentation — Observation terms — observation, observations, observational, observed Lab / medical testing assay, assays screen, screening, screened, diagnostic, diagnosis Preliminary / comparative pilot benchmark, benchmarking, benchmarked Category 2: Statistical & Empirical Terms — Statistical methods and empirical validation. General empirical empirical, empirically evidence, evidential, data-driven, quantitative, measurement, measured Estimation / inference — estimate, estimated, estimation, estimator, inference, inferential, simulation, simulate, simulated Validation / verification validation, validate, validated, validating, verify, verified, verifying, verification confirmatory, confirmation Statistical testing hypothesis test, hypothesis testing, null hypothesis, alternative hypothesis, significance test, statistical test, p-value, confidence interval, power analysis Bayesian, frequentist, likelihood, likelihood function, likelihood ratio Specific methods t-test, F-test, z-test, chi-square, ANOVA, regression analysis, correlation test, bootstrap, permutation test, Wilcoxon, Mann–Whitney, Kruskal–Wallis, Fisher exact test, Fisher test, Kolmogorov–Smirnov, Shapiro–Wilk nonparametric test, parametric test Category 3: Causal Inference Terms — Methods for establishing causal relationships. Randomization randomized, randomization, randomised, randomisation, random assignment, RCT, randomized controlled trial, randomized control trial, randomized experiment — Quasiexperimental quasi-experiment, quasi-experimental, natural experiment,…
May 3, 2026 at 5:36 PM
ralfwittenbrink.bsky.social
der Bevölkerung einzudämmen und die Belastung durch Autoimmunerkrankungen zu begrenzen, z. B. die Entwicklung von Impfstoffen, die eine Infektion verhindern und nicht nur den Schweregrad der akuten Erkrankung verringern können.
SARS-CoV-2 infection provokes sustained autoantibody elevation in both subjects with and without PASC. (A) Autoantibodies with diverse specificities are elevated in NP and CC compared with HC at all study visits. (B and C) Autoantibodies associated with SLE, systemic sclerosis, and inflammatory myopathy are particularly elevated in NP (n = 17) over CC (n = 14) and HC (n = 15). *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.005 by Kruskal-Wallis multiple comparisons test with uncorrected Dunn posttest. Multiple comparisons were corrected for by controlling the false discovery rate (0.05) in (C). Z scores were calculated in R relative to the mean and SD of the HC group for each autoantibody.
August 27, 2024 at 8:43 PM
lkfazio.bsky.social
Developed new game Bad Vaxx. Participants either play game or Tetris. Posttest see headlines neutral or manipulative. Test immediately or after various delays ability to detect manipulative headlines and likelihood to share. Effect decays across 2 weeks but sustained with booster. /End
New Gamified Inoculation Study Bad Vaxx • The game (+-10 min) trains people to recognize 4 different manipulation techniques that are commonly used for spreading vaccine misinformation • Manipulation techniques based on previous literature (Kata 2010, 2012) Mystic Mac Conspirers
February 21, 2025 at 9:56 PM
drgattimays.bsky.social
#PostTest Q1️⃣ #TumorBoardTuesday
👉🏽#CME Eval 🔗 integrityce.com/TBTeval24
👉🏽ALL CME🔗 integrityce.com/TBT2024
2024 Tumor Board Tuesday Evaluation
Take this survey powered by surveymonkey.com. Create your own surveys for free.
integrityce.com
October 22, 2025 at 12:58 AM
linstonwin.bsky.social
1) Yang & Tsiatis 2001 proved (a) "ANCOVA II" (which I later studied in my 2013 finite-population paper) is asymptotically more efficient than 1 and 3, and (b) with equal sample sizes in treatment & control, 2 ("ANCOVA I") is asymptotically equivalent to ANCOVA II

www.jstor.org/stable/2685694
Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Trial on JSTOR
Li Yang, Anastasios A. Tsiatis, Efficiency Study of Estimators for a Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Trial, The American Statistician, Vol. 55, No. 4 (Nov., 2001), pp. 314-321
www.jstor.org
March 23, 2026 at 4:46 PM
christinatoupala.bsky.social
🎓 Neue Bachelorarbeit
Können Online-Self-Assessments (OSA) auch während des Bachelorstudiums wirksam sein?
In einer Pretest–Posttest-Studie (N = 18) unter Psychologie-Studierenden zeigten sich nach der Durchführung eines OSA statistisch signifikante Zuwächse in Motivation und Entscheidungsintention.
July 8, 2026 at 8:14 AM
psyarxivbot.bsky.social
Bounding Causal Effects in Pretest-Posttest Designs with a Control Group: https://osf.io/f98ym
September 3, 2026 at 7:47 PM
mugander.bsky.social
Interpretation for both LR+ and ILR- in terms of how conclusive the test changes pretest to posttest likelihood of a positive (or negative) finding:

>10 = large
5-10 = moderate
2-5 = small but sometimes important
<2 = inconclusive
September 19, 2025 at 1:15 AM
zoezhang.bsky.social
#PostTest Q1️⃣ #TumorBoardTuesday
👉🏽#CME Eval 🔗 integrityce.com/TBTeval24
👉🏽ALL CME🔗 integrityce.com/TBT2024

Per INAVO120 data in ET-refractory, PIK3CA+ HR+ la/mBC, adding inavolisib to palbociclib + fulvestrant improved mPFS to:
9 months
12 months
15 months
18 months
2024 Tumor Board Tuesday Evaluation
Take this survey powered by surveymonkey.com. Create your own surveys for free.
integrityce.com
January 15, 2025 at 1:57 AM
katherinezhoumd.bsky.social
#PostTest Q2️⃣ #TumorBoardTuesday
👉🏽 Free CME 🔗 integrityce.com/TBT2024

🧐 Which of the following would you select for a 78-year-old man w/ mPDAC (CLDN18.2, 45%; MSS; gBRCA WT) and disease progression after gemcitabine/abraxane❓
1) FOLFIRINOX
2) Regorafenib trial
3) CLDN18.2 BiTe trial
4) Pembrolizumab
February 5, 2025 at 2:06 AM
michaelanes.bsky.social
Results from a(n apparently difficult) 21-item pretest-posttest containing Polish history & Holocaust history from my new interdisciplinary Portraits of Holocaust Violence course. 37% correct to 58% correct, d=1.68. Cool; I'll take it.
December 4, 2024 at 9:05 PM