#SystematicReview
November 1, 2026 at 5:15 PM
🌿 Can #cannabis-based medicines help adults with #cancer pain?

📸 During this #BreastCancerMonth, get the #healthevidence picture in this Cochrane #systematicreview:

www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
October 29, 2026 at 3:40 PM
Planning a Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis? Get professional support with PRISMA guidelines, literature screening, data extraction and statistical synthesis.

📩 Share your research topic for consultation!

#SystematicReview #MetaAnalysis #LabtechInnovations
October 29, 2026 at 12:54 AM
When you’re writing up the methodology for a search you did quite a while ago (longer than quite…) and are critical of what you didn’t know back then #SystematicReview Somethibg for the Limitations… and an example of the fact that you’re always learning.
October 26, 2026 at 2:10 PM
📢 Environmental Evidence is seeking Handling Editors and Editorial Board members! These are volunteer roles supporting CEE's journal. Contact journal@environmentalevidence.org to learn more. Position descriptions in 🧵 (1/3)

#EvidenceSynthesis #CEE #SystematicReview #EnvironmentalEvidence
October 22, 2026 at 5:06 PM
🎀 Is #yoga helpful for women with #breastcancer?

📸 Get the current #healthevidence picture in this Cochrane #systematicreview:

www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
October 22, 2026 at 6:03 PM
Online triage can speed clinical decisions and improve information quality, but also adds workflow complexity and changes decision-making. More research is needed. #PrimaryCare #DigitalHealth #OnlineTriage #SystematicReview buff.ly/Yrvi8Qe
https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/15/5/e094068
buff.ly
October 22, 2026 at 3:36 PM
📢 Is Q fever being underdiagnosed in Portugal?

📖 By: Rita Calouro, Joana Moreira da Silva, Filipa Ceia, Patrícia Poeta, and Rafael Rocha

📖 Read the full paper: doi.org/10.3390/zoon...

#MDPI #CoxiellaBurnetii #QFever #Portugal #OneHealth #SystematicReview #Surveillance
October 21, 2026 at 1:51 PM
🆕 Cochrane #SystematicReview: Pharmaceutical industry information and promotional strategies aimed at prescribers

www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....

Gifts/payments from pharma companies to doctors increase INAPPROPRIATE #prescribing & the number of prescriptions that doctors write 💰🎁

#pharma
October 20, 2026 at 6:53 PM
🚨ICYMI: Cochrane #HTN Review update

Pharmacotherapy for mild #hypertension cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....

In ppl w/ mildly elevated #BloodPressure (BP) w/out CVD or related health risks, BP meds may not reduce risk of death or of developing major CVD

#SystematicReview #MedEd
October 20, 2026 at 7:09 PM
🫁 Does #vitaminD help people with #COPD?

📸 Get the current #healthevidence picture in this Cochrane #systematicreview:

www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
October 19, 2026 at 4:10 PM
This #SystematicReview found that local incentive schemes in #GeneralPractice had a positive impact on process measures but limited impact on health outcome measures doi.org/10.3399/BJGP... #PrimaryCare
Impact of local enhanced incentive schemes on the performance of general practices within the UK: a systematic review
Background To drive improvements in healthcare quality and to reduce inequalities, pay-for-performance (P4P) schemes have become widespread internationally. In recent years, most local commissioning bodies in the UK have developed their own local general practice incentive schemes. Aim To examine the use and effectiveness of local incentive schemes and their alignment to the national Quality and Outcomes Framework. Design and setting Systematic review of quantitative studies related to local incentive schemes with a P4P structure within UK general practice published after 2004. Method Searches were conducted via Ovid across the Embase and MEDLINE databases. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care criteria and a narrative synthesis was undertaken. Results In total, 17 studies were identified, which were focused on 14 local incentive schemes. All studies were from England, except one from Scotland. Five studies included only tailored indicators, and seven studies included both aligned and tailored indicators. Quality assessment suggested the current evidence was of mixed quality. All studies that reported on process measures ( n = 15) demonstrated positive impacts, but health outcome measures were only evaluated in nine studies showing inconsistent findings. Eight studies addressed impact on health inequalities and no studies addressed cost-effectiveness, patient-reported outcomes, or experience measures. Conclusion There is an emerging evidence base that local incentive schemes in general practice lead to improvements in process measures, although methodological quality of studies is mixed. Future studies should utilise more robust methods to evaluate effectiveness and examine impacts on health inequalities, cost-effectiveness, and variation by practice.
doi.org
October 21, 2026 at 10:21 AM
What are the costs and cost-utility of #SGLT2 inhibitors for #CKD management? Find out in this #SystematicReview

doi.org/10.1177/2054...

@dalhousieu.bsky.social @csnscn.bsky.social @sagepub.com
October 20, 2026 at 11:45 AM
For non-antibiotic interventions for the prevention of recurrent urinary tract infections, this #SystematicReview found evidence for cranberry and methenamine hippurate, vaginal oestrogen in postmenopausal women, and increased fluid intake in women with low fluid intake doi.org/10.3399/BJGP... #UTI
Non-antibiotic interventions to prevent recurrent urinary tract infections in women: overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials
Background Recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI), i.e. 2 or more UTIs in last 6 months or 3 or more in last 12 months, are common, have substantial impact on quality of life and cause major antibiotic use. Design Overview of systematic reviews of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of non-pharmaceutical and pharmaceutical (non-antibiotic) interventions for preventing rUTI in women. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Google Scholar and Cochrane from January 2014 to May 2025 for systematic reviews of RCTs assessing effectiveness of community-based non-antibiotic interventions for preventing UTI in women aged 16 or over with rUTI. We excluded studies in intensive care units, people with indwelling catheters or comparing different oral antibiotic regimens. There were no limitations regarding outcome measures or language. Findings 27 systematic reviews met inclusion criteria evaluating probiotics (9), D-mannose (7), vaginal oestrogen (7), cranberry (6), methenamine hippurate (3), herbal medicine (3), increased fluid intake (2), systemic oestrogen (4), acupuncture (2), vaccines (2). Eight examined combination strategies. Cranberry and methenamine hippurate use are supported by systematic reviews, as is vaginal oestrogen amongst postmenopausal women, although questions remain around dose, duration and treatment adherence. Reviews of probiotics, D-mannose, herbal medicine, acupuncture and vaccines concluded that stronger evidence is needed. Increased fluid intake benefits women with low intake, but further research is needed on optimal intake. There was little information on treatment adherence or acceptability for many interventions. Conclusions For effective interventions, questions remain about optimal use and for many stronger evidence is needed.
doi.org
October 21, 2026 at 10:11 AM
Increased awareness, monitoring, and supported behavioural change are required to improve cardiovascular risk reduction in women following adverse #Pregnancy outcomes doi.org/10.3399/BJGP... @penseewu.bsky.social @dclovesgp.bsky.social #GeneralPractice #PrimaryCare #SystematicReview #Qualitative
Primary care cardiovascular risk reduction after pregnancy complications: a qualitative systematic review
Background Adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) affect approximately 30% of pregnancies and confer lifelong elevated cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Behavioural interventions may mitigate this risk. Aim To systematically review qualitative literature on women’s experiences of behavioural change for cardiovascular risk reduction following APOs, with a focus on health equity. Design and setting Qualitative systematic review, limited to high-income countries with universal access to health care. Method A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL from inception to March 2025 identified primary studies. Thematic synthesis followed Thomas and Harden’s three-stage approach. Themes were mapped onto the COM-B (Capability, Opportunity, Motivation-Behaviour) framework to theoretically ground and structure analysis. Results Eighteen studies involving 339 women met inclusion criteria. Women who were minority ethnic formed the majority in only two studies. Demographic data regarding socioeconomic status, ethnicity, or both were absent from five. Experiences shaping behaviour change aligned with COM-B domains. Delayed physical and psychological recovery after APOs reduced women’s capability to initiate changes. Competing demands, including childcare, household responsibilities, and work, restricted opportunity to focus on long-term cardiovascular health. Opportunities improved when behaviour changes were easily integrated into family life and offered shared benefits. Motivation was strengthened by awareness of increased CVD risk, the responsibilities of parenthood, and personalised advice from healthcare professionals. Tailored, proactive follow-up supported engagement, especially for minority ethnic and socioeconomically disadvantaged groups. Conclusion Prevention of CVD after APOs requires structured, system-level support to prioritise family-based behaviour change. High-risk groups are underrepresented in research; coproducing interventions with these groups may help to avoid widening health inequalities.
doi.org
October 21, 2026 at 10:22 AM
This new #JGIM #SystematicReview found that visual impairment is associated with increased odds of delirium across diverse adult populations & care settings

How will this impact the care that YOU provide?

Check out the 🆓 full-text and comment ⬇️:
rdcu.be/U3AtC6umWW9a
October 16, 2026 at 8:02 PM
This new #SystematicReview examines factors influencing baseline #electrocardiography parameters in experimental studies in #rats.
doi.org/10.14814/phy...
#Cardiac #Physiology
October 15, 2026 at 9:15 AM
Our new research is out now! Interventions to support parents whose babies cry excessively: a systematic review.

Read the full article online at: publications.aap.org/pediatrics/a...

#OA #systematicreview #evidence #parenting #babies #crying

HT @ntunews.bsky.social @ntupsychology.bsky.social
October 15, 2026 at 1:38 PM
I think more people with research platforms ought to be reiterating whenever possible what PRISMA is and what PRISMA means.

#systematicreview #reporting
October 13, 2026 at 5:07 PM
🩸From the #TransfusionEvidence Round-Up - #WorldPostpartumHaemorrhageDay 2026:

📑Effectiveness of Nursing Interventions in Reducing Maternal Mortality in Resource-Limited Settings: A #SystematicReview and #MetaAnalysis
by Kaur and Upendra

🔗Link in the comments
#MedSky
October 13, 2026 at 8:47 AM
For systematic review references, hallucination rates were 39.6% for GPT-3.5, 28.6% for GPT-4, and 91.4% for Bard; validation remained essential. #SystematicReview #ChatGPT #ReferenceHallucination doi.org/10.2196/53164
https://doi.org/10.2196/53164
doi.org
October 13, 2026 at 8:20 PM
🌸 Is mindfulness-based stress reduction (#MBSR) helpful for women with breast cancer?

📸 During this #BreastCancerMonth, get the current #healthevidence picture in this Cochrane #systematicreview:

www.cochranelibrary.com/cdsr/doi/10....
October 13, 2026 at 6:09 PM
#hotoffthepress #systematicreview

Barriers and facilitators to engagement in fall interventions among older adults from ethnic backgrounds: a systematic review ⏬

Key facilitators:
📖 knowledge of intervention
✅ perceived benefits
🗪 bilingual staff
🫂 family support

www.sciencedirect.co...
October 13, 2026 at 10:00 AM