Background As longevity increases and the population over age 65 expands, advancing age remains the most reliable predictor of cognitive decline, highlighting the need to identify biological mechanisms that support exceptional cognitive aging. We tested whether lower inherited risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia predicts SuperAger status (adults ≥ 80 years with episodic memory at least as good as middle-age adults) using prospectively enrolled SuperAgers and Cognitively Average Controls (Controls) from the multisite SuperAging Research Initiative. Methods We studied 231 participants (SuperAgers n = 142; Controls n = 89). We confirmed that the genetic ancestry structure across groups was comparable. We evaluated whether APOE status (ε2, ε3, ε4) and three AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from large contemporary Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (PRSLambert, PRSWightman, PRSBellenguez) predicted SuperAging status using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education, considering ancestry interactions. Results APOE allele and genotype distributions did not differ between groups, and neither APOE nor any of the three PRS predicted SuperAger status. Results were unchanged when accounting for global non-European or African ancestry or principal components. In this well-characterized cohort, neither APOE nor contemporary PRS explained SuperAger status. Conclusions These findings suggest that the exceptional late-life memory phenotype that is characteristic of SuperAging is not explained by common-variant AD genetic risk captured by APOE or contemporary AD PRS, motivating a deeper investigation of potential rare genetic variations and experiential factors contributing to exceptional cognitive aging.

Background Growing evidence implicates gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis via the gut-brain axis. Dysbiosis contributes to neuroinflammation, amyloid-β deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and cognitive decline. Synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics) offer a promising strategy to modulate GM, potentially ameliorating these AD hallmarks through multiple mechanisms including enhanced production of neuroprotective short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), reduced inflammation, improved gut barrier integrity, and immunomodulation. Objective This review critically evaluates the current evidence on the therapeutic potential of synbiotics for AD. It aims to synthesize findings from preclinical and clinical studies regarding the efficacy of synbiotics in improving cognitive function and AD pathology, elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms including GM modulation, SCFA production, immune regulation, and gut-brain signaling, and identify key challenges and future research directions for translating GM-targeted interventions into effective AD therapies. Conclusion Synbiotics demonstrate significant potential, particularly in early AD, by improving cognitive domains, reducing neuroinflammation and AD biomarkers, and modulating beneficial microbial metabolites. However, challenges include confounding factors, unresolved questions about causality, inconsistent results in advanced disease, and insufficient large-scale human trials. Future success hinges on rigorous longitudinal randomized controlled trials integrating multi-omics approaches, advanced in vitro models, and personalized strategies considering baseline microbiota and host genetics. While not a standalone cure, synbiotics represent a valuable component within multi-target therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating the gut-brain axis to slow AD progression.

Abstract Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a common form of dementia characterized by memory loss, cognitive and linguistic abilities declining and self-care capabilities diminishment. With the aging population globally, AD poses a significant threat to public health. Current treatments for AD aim to alleviate symptoms and slow down disease progression, but due to the limited understanding of underlying disease mechanisms, AD is still impossible to be cured yet. In recent years, there has been an exponential growth in exosome-related research because of their excellent biocompatibility ability, loading capacity and cellular internalization, making exosome to be one of the hotspots and a promising strategy in AD therapy research. This comprehensive review systematically explores the potential roles of various exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategy in AD treatment, with a particular focus on their specific biological mechanisms of action. Firstly, we elaborated on the pathological mechanisms of AD formation as well as the mechanisms related to the formation, secretion and function of exosome. Additionally, we highlighted the research progress in the development of exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies for AD treatment and their corresponding biological mechanisms. Furthermore, we delved into the challenges and opportunities these strategies facing in clinical application. Looking forward to future research directions and trends, our review aims to provide a more comprehensive understanding and guidance with the application of exosome in AD treatment. Exosome-based nanotherapeutic strategies, as a new therapeutic approach, have opened up new possibilities for the treatment of AD and brought new light to patients. Graphical abstract Schematic diagram of exosome-based nanotherapy strategies for the treatment of AD. It can be roughly classified as: exosomes-based methods treating AD and bioengineered exosomes for the treatment of AD.

Background As longevity increases and the population over age 65 expands, advancing age remains the most reliable predictor of cognitive decline, highlighting the need to identify biological mechanisms that support exceptional cognitive aging. We tested whether lower inherited risk of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) dementia predicts SuperAger status (adults ≥ 80 years with episodic memory at least as good as middle-age adults) using prospectively enrolled SuperAgers and Cognitively Average Controls (Controls) from the multisite SuperAging Research Initiative. Methods We studied 231 participants (SuperAgers n = 142; Controls n = 89). We confirmed that the genetic ancestry structure across groups was comparable. We evaluated whether APOE status (ε2, ε3, ε4) and three AD polygenic risk scores (PRS) derived from large contemporary Genome-Wide Association Studies (GWAS) (PRSLambert, PRSWightman, PRSBellenguez) predicted SuperAging status using logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, and education, considering ancestry interactions. Results APOE allele and genotype distributions did not differ between groups, and neither APOE nor any of the three PRS predicted SuperAger status. Results were unchanged when accounting for global non-European or African ancestry or principal components. In this well-characterized cohort, neither APOE nor contemporary PRS explained SuperAger status. Conclusions These findings suggest that the exceptional late-life memory phenotype that is characteristic of SuperAging is not explained by common-variant AD genetic risk captured by APOE or contemporary AD PRS, motivating a deeper investigation of potential rare genetic variations and experiential factors contributing to exceptional cognitive aging.

Background Growing evidence implicates gut microbiota (GM) dysbiosis in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis via the gut-brain axis. Dysbiosis contributes to neuroinflammation, amyloid-β deposition, tau hyperphosphorylation, blood-brain barrier disruption, and cognitive decline. Synbiotics (combinations of probiotics and prebiotics) offer a promising strategy to modulate GM, potentially ameliorating these AD hallmarks through multiple mechanisms including enhanced production of neuroprotective short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs), reduced inflammation, improved gut barrier integrity, and immunomodulation. Objective This review critically evaluates the current evidence on the therapeutic potential of synbiotics for AD. It aims to synthesize findings from preclinical and clinical studies regarding the efficacy of synbiotics in improving cognitive function and AD pathology, elucidate the underlying biological mechanisms including GM modulation, SCFA production, immune regulation, and gut-brain signaling, and identify key challenges and future research directions for translating GM-targeted interventions into effective AD therapies. Conclusion Synbiotics demonstrate significant potential, particularly in early AD, by improving cognitive domains, reducing neuroinflammation and AD biomarkers, and modulating beneficial microbial metabolites. However, challenges include confounding factors, unresolved questions about causality, inconsistent results in advanced disease, and insufficient large-scale human trials. Future success hinges on rigorous longitudinal randomized controlled trials integrating multi-omics approaches, advanced in vitro models, and personalized strategies considering baseline microbiota and host genetics. While not a standalone cure, synbiotics represent a valuable component within multi-target therapeutic approaches aimed at modulating the gut-brain axis to slow AD progression.

Jaw-dropping patient videos and miraculous testimonials ignited a frenzy in China over a technique that aims to improve drainage from the brain. Now it is entering trials worldwide.

Scientists deleted a gene linked to Alzheimer’s disease in mice, which reduced protein buildup and cognitive decline.

May 18 - 22, 2026 | Bar Harbor, Maine This hands-on workshop is designed to accelerate preclinical Alzheimer’s Disease (AD) research by equipping participants with computational techniques and tools t...