Prefacing this with the fact I already have a huggingface account - this is comes off as disingenuous because it creates a discussion issue on the page of the dataset, which is open to anyone to participate in. This is not reporting, it's a vector for future harassment. Please offer a real solution.
It’s a bit tricky because I think the slippery slope is very important to keep in mind. It’s not very far from “the AI decided to hack huggingface because that’s what it decided it wanted to do in its mind” to “LLMs are accountable for their own actions, and also deserve rights”
September 24, 2026 at 5:33 PM
dog attack : dog's owner :: HuggingFace swarm : OpenAI
I made a comment and so far I've been getting only harassment. So either the devs are little shitwads who scream and cry when told no, or they've opened people up to harassment.
November 28, 2024 at 2:04 AM
Apparently if you request data takedown on HuggingFace right now, this just gets you harassed by a bunch of AI dorks.
We are reproducing the full DeepSeek R1 data and training pipeline so everybody can use their recipe. Instead of doing it in secret we can do it together in the open!
We are reproducing the full DeepSeek R1 data and training pipeline so everybody can use their recipe. Instead of doing it in secret we can do it together in the open!
this is about the huggingface thing, right? it's going to sting but over-anthropomorphization of chatbots responding to one another is going to keep happening until we accept the hard truth that "ability to post" is not itself indicative of human intelligence
this is about the huggingface thing, right? it's going to sting but over-anthropomorphization of chatbots responding to one another is going to keep happening until we accept the hard truth that "ability to post" is not itself indicative of human intelligence