The recent decision of Secretary of State for the Home Department v Kolicaj contains a welcome re-statement by the Court of Appeal of the importance of procedural fairness and the right to make rep…

Short Meta Description YouTube has every right to fight low-quality AI spam. But vague policy language and unclear enforcement are leaving ...

Following a contested quasi-judicial hearing, city counsel and staff argued the final plat conformed to the preliminary plat and improvements were built or bonded; the council voted 6–1 to deny the appeal and affirm staff's approval of the final plat.

You've been told who's hearing your disciplinary or grievance, and something about it doesn't sit right. That unease might come from recognising them from

An employee wasn't shown new evidence added late in a disciplinary process. The tribunal found the dismissal unfair. Here's what your rights are.

A governor's dismissal was ruled procedurally unfair for vague charges and a blocked companion, but the award was cut 80% for Polkey and 15% for fault.

A pregnant employee learned of her dismissal via an emailed P45. The tribunal ruled this was discrimination, plus unfair and wrongful dismissal.

An EAT ruling confirms your right to bring a colleague to a disciplinary hearing only kicks in once you actually ask. Employer silence isn't enough.

A tribunal found a 'redundancy' process was really a contract variation under a mobility clause, so no dismissal ever legally took place at all.

Before a disciplinary hearing, you were entitled to know what you were accused of and to see the evidence being used against you. If those things did not happen, the process was not fair.

Council members debate returning Sugar Camp application to planning commission for further review.

Court finds he subsequently suffered psychiatric injury.

Archive of Truth In Exile: How a court ignores the fundamentals of justice in favor of police authority?

At a Texas Workforce Commission meeting, Jim Meehan of the Austin Lighthouse for the Blind urged expansion of the PPD program and fee-schedule review to sustain services; caller Caleb Jones Timbs urged independent review of a misconduct finding and the commission voted to resubmit case 3934951 for further consideration.

Judge examines implications of late affirmative defenses in Healy's auctioneer litigation.

Concerns arise over fairness in handling GTU records during hearings before TAXI commission.

Residents raised concerns about selective enforcement and whether fines were being imposed without hearings; the commission reviewed attorney‑drafted ordinance changes — including requiring BASSET certification for commissioners, converting 'annual fees' to 'license fees,' new video‑gaming cafe classifications, and a five‑year fingerprint resubmission — and voted to forward the package to the village board.

The board rules against allowing additional HOA testimony during the liquor license review.

Read our very own Federal Court success story involving a Parent and Grandparent sponsorship application, where we challenged an officer’s breach of procedural fairness in Ferreria v Canada (Citizensh...