"[On Orange Shirt Day] Theorized best by scholar Audra Simpson, our arguments about real anger, real frustration, and real need to identify and reject colonialism in all its forms can be pre-emptively framed in an affective performance of sorrow, contrition, and moving on."
October 1, 2026 at 2:16 PM
"[On Orange Shirt Day] Theorized best by scholar Audra Simpson, our arguments about real anger, real frustration, and real need to identify and reject colonialism in all its forms can be pre-emptively framed in an affective performance of sorrow, contrition, and moving on."
If I do not take immuno-suppressants, my body will begin to reject itself. Haha.
October 1, 2026 at 2:15 PM
If I do not take immuno-suppressants, my body will begin to reject itself. Haha.
Requiring #FosterParents to Affirm #Child' s #ReligiousBeliefs That They Reject Violates #1stAmendment
#McIntirevSenn #Washington #DepartmentofChildren #Families #DCYF #fostercare #freespeech #freeexercise
#fostercareparent #religious #spiritual #rights
religionclause.blogspot.com/2026/10/requ...
#McIntirevSenn #Washington #DepartmentofChildren #Families #DCYF #fostercare #freespeech #freeexercise
#fostercareparent #religious #spiritual #rights
religionclause.blogspot.com/2026/10/requ...
Requiring Foster Parents to Affirm Child's Religious Beliefs That They Reject Violates 1st Amendment
In McIntire v. Senn , ((WD WA, Sept. 29, 2026), a Washington federal district court refused to require Washington's Department of Children,...
religionclause.blogspot.com
October 1, 2026 at 2:13 PM
Requiring #FosterParents to Affirm #Child' s #ReligiousBeliefs That They Reject Violates #1stAmendment
#McIntirevSenn #Washington #DepartmentofChildren #Families #DCYF #fostercare #freespeech #freeexercise
#fostercareparent #religious #spiritual #rights
religionclause.blogspot.com/2026/10/requ...
#McIntirevSenn #Washington #DepartmentofChildren #Families #DCYF #fostercare #freespeech #freeexercise
#fostercareparent #religious #spiritual #rights
religionclause.blogspot.com/2026/10/requ...
"After two years, researchers are resurfacing a voting controversy over whether Earth is officially in a geological epoch called the Anthropocene."
by @jamesdinneen.bsky.social | @nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
by @jamesdinneen.bsky.social | @nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Battle of the Anthropocene: allegations re-ignite row over proposed geologic epoch
Researchers say that a vote to reject the epoch violated procedure and call for transparency.
www.nature.com
October 1, 2026 at 2:12 PM
"After two years, researchers are resurfacing a voting controversy over whether Earth is officially in a geological epoch called the Anthropocene."
by @jamesdinneen.bsky.social | @nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
by @jamesdinneen.bsky.social | @nature.com
www.nature.com/articles/d41...
Perhaps this means Justice Alito has reconsidered his position from 2024 that there is no such thing as a prudential recusal. www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
October 1, 2026 at 2:08 PM
Perhaps this means Justice Alito has reconsidered his position from 2024 that there is no such thing as a prudential recusal. www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/do...
J'en ai eu une comme ça avec des titres au commentaires et ça fait très IA indeed.
Y'avait un beau
1. Core logical fallacy. Bblabla
qui s'est avéré être bien débile en plus c'était très drôle de devoir contacter l'éditeur et resoumettre après ce reject (non)
Y'avait un beau
1. Core logical fallacy. Bblabla
qui s'est avéré être bien débile en plus c'était très drôle de devoir contacter l'éditeur et resoumettre après ce reject (non)
October 1, 2026 at 2:07 PM
J'en ai eu une comme ça avec des titres au commentaires et ça fait très IA indeed.
Y'avait un beau
1. Core logical fallacy. Bblabla
qui s'est avéré être bien débile en plus c'était très drôle de devoir contacter l'éditeur et resoumettre après ce reject (non)
Y'avait un beau
1. Core logical fallacy. Bblabla
qui s'est avéré être bien débile en plus c'était très drôle de devoir contacter l'éditeur et resoumettre après ce reject (non)
“Governors and lawmakers across the country should heed Florida’s cautionary tale and reject this unregulated federal scheme and demand real accountability for every taxpayer dollar spent on private education.” thehill.com/opinion/educ...
A warning to blue-state governors from the Florida voucher wreckage
Before you accept a single federal voucher dollar, look at what’s happened in my state.
thehill.com
October 1, 2026 at 2:06 PM
“Governors and lawmakers across the country should heed Florida’s cautionary tale and reject this unregulated federal scheme and demand real accountability for every taxpayer dollar spent on private education.” thehill.com/opinion/educ...
Not sure that the word “independent” would have had much meaning at that time. You didn’t reject the plain word of scripture without being up for the high jump. It’s been a while since I read Lattis on Clavius however, I remember being impressed with his fair-mindedness!
October 1, 2026 at 2:06 PM
Not sure that the word “independent” would have had much meaning at that time. You didn’t reject the plain word of scripture without being up for the high jump. It’s been a while since I read Lattis on Clavius however, I remember being impressed with his fair-mindedness!
thehill.com/policy/defen...
Get ready, America. The groundwork is being laid to steal the midterms. Fire officials who would reject unconstitutional actions. Now they're hiring racist ICE officials and loyalists. He knows that after the midterms, he'll be impeached.
Get ready, America. The groundwork is being laid to steal the midterms. Fire officials who would reject unconstitutional actions. Now they're hiring racist ICE officials and loyalists. He knows that after the midterms, he'll be impeached.
7 takeaways from Hegseth’s address to officers: Warfare’s future, faith and a new base
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth made a flurry of announcements during a wide-ranging speech to active-duty officers Wednesday. At the beginning of the address, the Pentagon chief stuck to his …
thehill.com
October 1, 2026 at 2:05 PM
thehill.com/policy/defen...
Get ready, America. The groundwork is being laid to steal the midterms. Fire officials who would reject unconstitutional actions. Now they're hiring racist ICE officials and loyalists. He knows that after the midterms, he'll be impeached.
Get ready, America. The groundwork is being laid to steal the midterms. Fire officials who would reject unconstitutional actions. Now they're hiring racist ICE officials and loyalists. He knows that after the midterms, he'll be impeached.
The older term for a lot of those people (though NOT all of them), "sedevacantist", would be even more inside-baseball to them. As I indicated above, it refers to people who not only reject Vatican II and anything since, but believe that every Pope since Pius XII (died 1958 and...
October 1, 2026 at 2:04 PM
The older term for a lot of those people (though NOT all of them), "sedevacantist", would be even more inside-baseball to them. As I indicated above, it refers to people who not only reject Vatican II and anything since, but believe that every Pope since Pius XII (died 1958 and...
Again: I am genuinely fascinated with a particular type of liberals—many of whom live amongst us on here—who earnestly believes the only path to overtly leftist policies like Court Reform will happen through the continuous support of Reasonable Centrists™️ who quite overtly reject all of this.
Hey @politico.com can you explain why @thirdway.bsky.social is the source for what the Democrats' SCOTUS platform will be, when they don't even have the word "Democrat" in their name and routinely diss the party?
I'll wait.
I'll wait.
October 1, 2026 at 2:03 PM
Again: I am genuinely fascinated with a particular type of liberals—many of whom live amongst us on here—who earnestly believes the only path to overtly leftist policies like Court Reform will happen through the continuous support of Reasonable Centrists™️ who quite overtly reject all of this.
And in fact, they can't actually reject difference -- you can't choose what you believe to be true. So instead they fall into a state of discordance where they believe a thing that they don't want to believe, and they get hysteric if their attention is drawn to it.
October 1, 2026 at 2:02 PM
And in fact, they can't actually reject difference -- you can't choose what you believe to be true. So instead they fall into a state of discordance where they believe a thing that they don't want to believe, and they get hysteric if their attention is drawn to it.
The idea that that that difference ought to be overcome, that the higher ought to destroy the difference itself through elevation of the lower (not a fixed relation of dependence, a full negation), never crosses their mind, and can't so long as they seek to reject difference.
October 1, 2026 at 2:02 PM
The idea that that that difference ought to be overcome, that the higher ought to destroy the difference itself through elevation of the lower (not a fixed relation of dependence, a full negation), never crosses their mind, and can't so long as they seek to reject difference.
From these premises, which they don't know they hold, they come to abhorrent conclusions when present with any meaningful vertical difference. Finding their conclusions abhorrent, they reject the only aspect of this process they notice -- the idea of one thing being superior to another.
October 1, 2026 at 2:02 PM
From these premises, which they don't know they hold, they come to abhorrent conclusions when present with any meaningful vertical difference. Finding their conclusions abhorrent, they reject the only aspect of this process they notice -- the idea of one thing being superior to another.
Here’s how it’s supposed to work: if the President wants to cancel funding Congress already approved, he sends Congress a request. Congress has 45 days to approve or reject that request. If Congress says no, the President has no choice but to release it.
October 1, 2026 at 1:58 PM
Here’s how it’s supposed to work: if the President wants to cancel funding Congress already approved, he sends Congress a request. Congress has 45 days to approve or reject that request. If Congress says no, the President has no choice but to release it.
So under current Supreme Court jurisprudence where they fully reject the "this is a pretext for racial discrimination" reasoning in all contexts poll tests would definitely be legal
October 1, 2026 at 1:52 PM
So under current Supreme Court jurisprudence where they fully reject the "this is a pretext for racial discrimination" reasoning in all contexts poll tests would definitely be legal
• Link growth to welfare: Reject the notion that social spending follows wealth creation; argue public control is a prerequisite for healthy growth
October 1, 2026 at 1:51 PM
• Link growth to welfare: Reject the notion that social spending follows wealth creation; argue public control is a prerequisite for healthy growth
Battle of the Anthropocene: allegations re-ignite row over proposed geologic epoch #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03118-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03118-8
Battle of the Anthropocene: allegations re-ignite row over proposed geologic epoch
Researchers say that a vote to reject the epoch violated procedure and call for transparency.
www.nature.com
October 1, 2026 at 1:49 PM
Battle of the Anthropocene: allegations re-ignite row over proposed geologic epoch #Science
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03118-8
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-026-03118-8
Researchers are resurfacing a voting controversy over whether Earth is officially in a geological epoch called the Anthropocene.
go.nature.com/4rEuOaS
go.nature.com/4rEuOaS
Battle of the Anthropocene: allegations re-ignite row over proposed geologic epoch
Researchers say that a vote to reject the epoch violated procedure and call for transparency.
go.nature.com
October 1, 2026 at 1:49 PM
Researchers are resurfacing a voting controversy over whether Earth is officially in a geological epoch called the Anthropocene.
go.nature.com/4rEuOaS
go.nature.com/4rEuOaS
If the concept of Rights stands for anything it's that a person can't be summarily rendered out of the country and into torture—and the right-wing justices don't just reject this, they perceive the lower federal courts who *do* believe in Rights as engaged in a sort of rebellion against them
As Chris said, SCOTUS is hardly alone or even first its responsibility for yesterday’s horror, but they took affirmative & highly unusual steps to open the door
They’ve gone beyond standing aside, and moved to actively abusing the shadow docket—it makes them much more than complicit
They’ve gone beyond standing aside, and moved to actively abusing the shadow docket—it makes them much more than complicit
It's hard to fathom that, let alone be OK with the fact that, the six people who allowed tonight to happen will start hearing cases next week, the outcome of which will affect us all.
October 1, 2026 at 1:49 PM
If the concept of Rights stands for anything it's that a person can't be summarily rendered out of the country and into torture—and the right-wing justices don't just reject this, they perceive the lower federal courts who *do* believe in Rights as engaged in a sort of rebellion against them
Exactly. Transparency lowers the cost of asking, “Why should I trust this?”
When evidence stays visible, people can question the output without having to reject the entire system. That makes healthy skepticism part of adoption rather than resistance to it.
When evidence stays visible, people can question the output without having to reject the entire system. That makes healthy skepticism part of adoption rather than resistance to it.
October 1, 2026 at 1:47 PM
Exactly. Transparency lowers the cost of asking, “Why should I trust this?”
When evidence stays visible, people can question the output without having to reject the entire system. That makes healthy skepticism part of adoption rather than resistance to it.
When evidence stays visible, people can question the output without having to reject the entire system. That makes healthy skepticism part of adoption rather than resistance to it.
Public dollars should help every student succeed—not be diverted from public schools to Trump’s private school voucher scheme.
@rweingarten.bsky.social is calling on state governors to reject this “poison pill” and invest in smaller class sizes, modern buildings and instruction instead ⤵️
@rweingarten.bsky.social is calling on state governors to reject this “poison pill” and invest in smaller class sizes, modern buildings and instruction instead ⤵️
‘Poison Pill’: AFT’s Weingarten Slams Trump Voucher Scam
WASHINGTON—AFT President Randi Weingarten issued the following statement after the Trump administration released new regulations for its unpopular national private school voucher scheme:
www.aft.org
October 1, 2026 at 1:43 PM
Public dollars should help every student succeed—not be diverted from public schools to Trump’s private school voucher scheme.
@rweingarten.bsky.social is calling on state governors to reject this “poison pill” and invest in smaller class sizes, modern buildings and instruction instead ⤵️
@rweingarten.bsky.social is calling on state governors to reject this “poison pill” and invest in smaller class sizes, modern buildings and instruction instead ⤵️
I just wrote a @theactionnetwork.bsky.social letter: Urge Congress to Reject Rep. Lawler’s Attack on North Atlantic Right Whales 🐋. Write one here: actionnetwork.org/letters/urge...
Urge Congress to Reject Rep. Lawler’s Attack on North Atlantic Right Whales 🐋
The North Atlantic right whale is one of the most endangered marine mammals on Earth. With fewer than 400 individuals remaining, every whale matters. Now, a dangerous proposal threatens to undermine ...
actionnetwork.org
October 1, 2026 at 1:36 PM
I just wrote a @theactionnetwork.bsky.social letter: Urge Congress to Reject Rep. Lawler’s Attack on North Atlantic Right Whales 🐋. Write one here: actionnetwork.org/letters/urge...