Topic
LightNews LightNews
Technology US

Anthropic hires Accenture for oversight

26d

Anthropic hired Accenture to provide third‑party safety testing and oversight of its AI products, the company said, and released three public progress indicators while pledging $1 billion.

by Kevin T. Kavanagh

0%
healthwatchusa.bsky.social
Very disturbing AI application. www.nytimes.com/2026/09/14/h...
U.S. Health Officials Move Quickly to Deploy Medical A.I. Despite Concerns
Federal projects are rolling out A.I. agents that offer therapy and prescribe medicine, raising concerns about safety and the influence of venture capital investors.
www.nytimes.com
September 19, 2026 at 12:45 PM

by Anne Norton

2%
annenortonnow.bsky.social
Interesting. Framing the AI as an independent agent absolves the companies/designers/programmers.
September 19, 2026 at 12:02 PM

by Timothy D. McBride

0%
mcbridetd.bsky.social
Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development www.politico.com/news/2026/09...
Anthropic, OpenAI, SpaceXAI, Google sued over call to ‘pace’ AI development
The lawsuit alleges comments about need to “pace the frontier” of AI represent illegal coordination between competitors.
www.politico.com
September 19, 2026 at 8:37 AM
La Repubblica
Anthropic proposes three public indicators to measure AI progress

The American lab Anthropic releases internal data on the degree of automation reached by its intelligent systems. From thirty thousand operating machines to the map of safety calculations, all the details of the study that measures the pace of progress.

Anthropic proposes three public indicators to measure AI progress
Reposts 0 25d

by Stephen A. Meserve

11%
smeserve.bsky.social
This is my absolute bone core experience (with many students, told AI is the best all the way up to the uni president). *This* is what AI is doing to people in society even worse than doing a iffy job at times, just letting it make decisions

(accidentally QTed a reply the first time!)
maxkennerly.bsky.social Max Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social · 26d
Lot of issues here but one part that sticks out in light of the almost-attacked-a-Chinese-ship story today: people with very important jobs where lives are at stake have bought the hype and outsourced their whole brains to AI. We're going to see more and more of this.

www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
September 19, 2026 at 2:11 AM

Reposted by Gary Marcus, Anders Nilsson, Larry W. Hunter , and 4 more

25%
adambecker.bsky.social
@aoc.bsky.social just put out a great statement on AI. Refreshing to see a major politician on the left nail this.

"Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that Al robots will destroy humanity. But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves."

🎯
Charles, Last weekend, Dario Amodei, the CEO of Anthropic, one of the largest Al companies in the world, publicly asked his industry to slow down Al development. Shortly after, Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAl, followed suit. Then Elon Musk. This all came days after an Anthropic researcher quit, citing his belief that this technology could wipe out humanity and that Al companies are "gambling with our lives." For years, people have warned that generative Al could slip out of our direct control. Those safety concerns must be taken seriously. And this is why I have advocated for strict safety standards on how Al is built and deployed, public oversight over this technology, and using existing laws to hold these companies accountable when they cause harm. But I want to draw your attention to another reality: Right now, the U.S. economy and our financial futures are riding on Silicon Valley's bet that Al will soon be immensely profitable and pay off. And that bet isn't looking good. The formula for a profitable business isn't complicated: make more money than you spend. But the biggest Al companies aren't doing that. They are spending hundreds of billions per year on data centers, chips, and other costs while their ability to make revenues that exceed their already-immense sunk costs are unclear. Experts estimate that these Al companies will require another $600 billion of debt just to finance themselves in 2026 alone. That is more than the entire budgets of the U.S. Departments of Justice, Transportation, & Education combined. Meanwhile, despite almost every single one of these companies not turning a profit & having sunk billions of investor dollars in development of data centers & other infrastructure, Al companies are also on a spending spree of hundreds of millions of dollars in lobbying & dark money in our elections. It would be one thing if we were discussing a few private companies with a poor business model. But last year, virtually all stock market gains - 80% - rested entirely on just a handful of Al companies. That tells us two things: 1. Nearly the entire U.S. economy outside the Al industry is relatively stagnating and faring poorly & the gains from these few companies are disguising it; & 2. Millions of people's retirements - including their pensions, 401ks, & investments - are potentially exposed to this risk. That's why these Al companies' dubious financial positions matter to working people. These companies argue that debt is necessary. They'll tell you that building transformative technologies requires upfront capital, & that massive borrowing today will pay off in generating unprecedented prosperity tomorrow. But this is not the typical debt that startups take on while they build out a company. We are talking about billions going on trillions of dollars leveraged with no indication that these companies will be able to recoup these funds profitably. And they are increasingly looking to the government as their source of cash. In an effort to hide their debt, tech companies have been relying on "circular financing" where tech giants like Google, Amazon, & Microsoft give billions to Al startups like OpenAl & Anthropic, only for those startups to hand that money right back to buy Al processing power. In other words, these Al companies are luring in new investors by making it look like their financials are healthier than they really are. What's even worse is that retirement & pension funds are key to supporting this illusion. When the Al companies issue bonds to raise more money, your pension funds & retirement accounts are some of the biggest buyers. When Musk's Al business went public, it became part of index funds where millions of Americans invest our savings. Many Americans don't even know that their retirement investments are tied up in these companies at all. From Big Tech's perspective, that's a feature, not a bug. By tying our futures to their reckless gambling, Al billionaires are trying to make themselves too big to fail. They think they can take such dangerous risks because we will bail them out if things go wrong. Sound familiar? This scene is dangerously reminiscent of the rampant speculation, corruption, & broken incentives leading up to the 2008 financial crisis that plunged millions of working class Americans into financial chaos that we never fully recovered from. It is no accident that these warnings from Altman & Amodei come months-if not weeks-before these companies were meant to go public. When companies go public, they have to be more transparent about how they are doing financially. And after a waiting period, they typically have to let private investors-like their own employees-sell their shares. The New York Times recently confirmed that OpenAl has postponed going public for this very reason. They are in no rush for the truth about their finances to come out. But the moment these oligarchs began to seek our public tax dollars & public contracts while exposing their companies to public pension funds & investments, they opened themselves to public accountability & scrutiny. Silicon Valley billionaires have rigged the game & are attempting to shift their financial risk to working people: If they're right about Al's potential, they reap the profits. If they're wrong & the bubble bursts, they are setting up the American people to pick up the tab. Heads, they win; tails, we lose. We can stop this, and we shouldn't play their game. Together we can address both the economic and safety threats of unrestricted Al development and prevent financial chaos and stabilize market risk. We must make it clear now that should the Al bubble pop, Congress should not bail out Big Tech. And across our federal agencies, we have the authorities and tools to hold Al companies and their leaders accountable for releasing dangerous, unvetted, and defective products. We must not wait. Silicon Valley billionaires want us to believe that Al robots will destroy humanity. But the biggest threat to humanity are the tech oligarchs themselves. It's time we hold them accountable. Thank you for reading. In solidarity, Alexandria
September 19, 2026 at 1:19 AM

Reposted by Diane Coyle

0%
financialtimes.com
Anthropic brings in Accenture for AI safety testing ft.trib.al/iOk1jtK
Anthropic brings in Accenture for AI safety testing
CEO Dario Amodei says labs should more deeply embed third-party testers as concerns grow around risks associated with the technology
ft.trib.al
September 18, 2026 at 11:51 PM

by David H. Kaye

9%
davidakaye.bsky.social
it's really essential to underline that the use of failing or problematic software tools/AI tech IN NO WAY ABSOLVES THE ACTORS OF CRIMINAL CULPABILITY.
maxkennerly.bsky.social Max Kennerly @maxkennerly.bsky.social · 26d
Lot of issues here but one part that sticks out in light of the almost-attacked-a-Chinese-ship story today: people with very important jobs where lives are at stake have bought the hype and outsourced their whole brains to AI. We're going to see more and more of this.

www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
September 18, 2026 at 11:44 PM

Reposted by Brooke Harrington, Kate Jackson

3%
beyerstein.bsky.social
Alex Karp of Palantir says the AI industry must be nationalized to protect it from lawsuits if it accidentally destroys the world. More likely, he sees the bubble about to burst and he wants to be bought out with our tax dollars before that happens.
September 18, 2026 at 10:58 PM

Reposted by Greg Linden, Brendan Nyhan, Stephen A. Meserve , and 1 more

18%
maxkennerly.bsky.social
Lot of issues here but one part that sticks out in light of the almost-attacked-a-Chinese-ship story today: people with very important jobs where lives are at stake have bought the hype and outsourced their whole brains to AI. We're going to see more and more of this.

www.cnn.com/2026/09/18/p...
In the past year, the Defense Department has rapidly made Maven a cornerstone of the US military apparatus. Several former senior US military officials now work for Palantir, including some with high-level security clearances in Centcom’s Tampa headquarters. Their role is to keep the software functioning inside secure military environments. Some Centcom personnel expected Maven to flag stale information or inconsistencies in the underlying intelligence assembled for potential targets, the officials said. It’s not clear why they had such expectations. The intelligence report, circulated across the US military this spring in the midst of the war with Iran, immediately set off alarm bells: A Chinese ship in the Middle East was transporting components of a nuclear weapons program. The US military swung into action with plans to intercept the vessel, according to four sources familiar with the episode. According to two of the sources, armed members of the US military were preparing to board the ship. Military planes were in the air, one of those sources and another source familiar with the incident said. It was only just before the planned operation that officials dug deeper into the report put together by a special operations command analyst and found it had been generated with the help of artificial intelligence (AI) — and that a chatbot the analyst had used inaccurately identified the material the ship was carrying. CNN was not able to learn what the misidentified cargo was.
September 18, 2026 at 10:29 PM

by Reid

4%
chup.blakereid.org
I think very highly of Lina Khan, but the trouble with a sort of common law approach to AI industrial policy under existing law is that it's premised on a highly optimistic view of extant competition and consumer protection law that is very hard to square with current political and legal reality.
cwarzel.bsky.social Charlie Warzel @cwarzel.bsky.social · 27d
spoke to Lina Khan today about the AI madness and what the hell we should be doing to hold these companies accountable (in a way that takes their power seriously but doesn't buy into every narrative) full pod coming in the AM!
theatlantic.com The Atlantic @theatlantic.com · 27d
AI firms are subject to already-existing laws, Lina Khan tells @cwarzel.bsky.social: Part of the conversation around regulating AI “seems to assume that these current developments are happening in some legal vacuum,” she adds, “and that is just false.”

theatln.tc/t9IwiQTz #TAF26
September 18, 2026 at 5:12 PM

by Marco Casassa Mont

60%
marcocasassamont.bsky.social
Interesting cybersecurity developments in the FrontierAI domain ...
techcrunch.com/2026/09/18/r... #FrontierAI #AI #cybersecurity
Researchers used Anthropic's Claude to hack into OpenAI | TechCrunch
Security researchers used Anthropic’s Claude to exploit vulnerabilities in OpenAI’s systems, taking over employee accounts and gaining access to an internal code repository before reporting the flaws.
techcrunch.com
September 18, 2026 at 3:01 PM

by Naomi Klein

5%
naomiaklein.bsky.social
What is the tech industry truly afraid of? Is it the AI they have unleashed, as they want us to believe? Or is it…all of us, standing up to them? Thanks to Chris Hayes for having us on.
September 18, 2026 at 2:57 PM

Reposted by Robert B. Reich

0%
sludge.bsky.social
NEW: One in five members of Congress reports investments in AI developers, chipmakers, cloud infrastructure providers, data center companies, or private AI startups, a Sludge analysis finds.

Here Are the Members of Congress Invested in the AI Industry readsludge.com/2026/09/18/h...
Here Are the Members of Congress Invested in the AI Industry
One in five members of Congress reports household investments in AI developers, chipmakers, cloud infrastructure providers, data center companies, or private AI startups, a Sludge analysis finds.
readsludge.com
September 18, 2026 at 2:32 PM
LightNews LightNews LightNews