#AFOLU
Cost-effective climate change mitigation through land sector contributions
To still reach the climate targets set by the Paris Agreement, immediate and comprehensive emission reductions are necessary (Sixth Assessment Report (AR6), Working Group III)1. A substantial share of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is caused by the Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use (AFOLU) sector1. Today, land-use change (LUC) CO2 emissions contribute 9.4% of total anthropogenic GHG emissions, and AFOLU-based CH4 and N2O emissions 10.1%2 in CO2 equivalents (CO2e). Roe et al. find that the AFOLU sector, including bioenergy, could potentially contribute 30% (15 GtCO2e per year) towards achieving a 1.5 °C target3, stressing the high relevance of the land-use sector for total global emissions reductions3,4,5,6. Key AFOLU mitigation strategies are ecosystem protection and restoration to stop and eventually revert LUC emissions, including those from drained peat- and wetlands, the improvement of agricultural management practices or policies promoting changes in diets to reduce CH4 and N2O emissions and the provision of bioenergy feedstocks to replace fossils and to serve as a carbon dioxide removal (CDR) option via bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS)3. Paris-compatible scenarios assessed in the latest Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report (AR6)7 show considerable contributions from the AFOLU sector to climate change mitigation. In...
www.nature.com
November 11, 2026 at 12:58 PM
ICOS joins #COP31 with two events:

Ocean carbon sink: observing needs and opportunities
📅 9 Nov, 13:00-14:30
📍Online

The importance of an integrated framework for AFOLU carbon balance from boreal to tropical peatlands
📅 12 Nov, 18:30-20:00
📍Side Event Room 2 - DALYAN

https://ow.ly/Wf2L510453P
November 5, 2026 at 12:58 PM
Delighted to see this pre-print online. Great work by PhD student Neha Jaggeshar on creating a national intergrated model so we can explore interactions across land (L), energy (E), agriculture (A) and forest (F) systems.

Discussion open

egusphere.copernicus.org/preprints/20...
October 10, 2026 at 8:44 AM
El mejor estudio que conozco sobre potencial de captura en AFOLU es este de Griscom et al (2027): Natural Climate Solutions, PNAS: www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Analiza 20 soluciones y su potencial de captura y coste €. Es completísimo, aunque debe haber cosas más recientes. En Océanos no entra.
September 9, 2026 at 1:23 PM
OK, but this chart appears to conveniently exclude AFOLU emissions. Here in the US we have been operating under the assumption that consumption emissions are roughly 3x activity-based GHGs.

Have y’all gone vegan ?

drive.google.com/drive/mobile...
USCP - Google Drive
drive.google.com
September 4, 2026 at 8:26 AM
Strategic foresight provides insight into the resilience of climate-neutral farming transitions in a volatile world
Figure 2 displays the GHG flux profile for Ireland’s AFOLU sector in 2020 and in 2050 for the 13 scenarios explored—BAU and four transition pathways, each of which is: (i) non-GHG-constrained; (ii) net zero CO2e emission constrained, or; (iii) split-gas emission (or land) constrained. Full time series are available in the supplementary information data file (S1 to S5). Relative to 2020, BAU results in an increase in emissions to 29.7 Mt CO2e. Other non-emissions-constrained scenarios would result in annual net emissions of between 11.6 (CN) and 21.7 (SI) Mt CO2e (Fig. 2a). Livestock numbers in the CN scenario are constrained by available land area because of a shift to more extensive cattle systems that support co-delivery of ecosystem services (ES), whilst high productivity cattle and high stocking rates combined with ambitious deployment of “frontier” abatement technologies (e.g. enteric methane inhibitors, anaerobic digestion) in the SI scenario moderate livestock reductions (Table 3). Conversely, achieving net zero emissions in AFOLU requires a 90% reduction in agricultural emissions, such that there is no emissions space for cattle production in the net zero CN pathway after emissions from cropping systems, pigs, poultry and sheep are accounted for (Table S1). Acknowledging the distinct warming dynamics...
www.nature.com
September 1, 2026 at 8:28 PM
I'm aware that "AFOLU" has contributed about 1/3 of cumulative CO2 to date, and most of that is from deforestation (agricultural clearing plays a big role), but having food systems as #2 source of warming still feels too big?
September 5, 2024 at 12:09 AM
In the special issue described in this editorial, working with several developing country teams, we articulated practical bottom-up guidance for reaching net-zero across the economy in key sectors: power, transport, industry and AFOLU, and in the context of countries' other goals @iddri.bsky.social
📃 EDITORIAL: Introducing our upcoming special issue, @chrisbataille.bsky.social et al. present advancements in the Deep Decarbonization Pathways (DDP) methodology to support national #carbonneutral transitions, highlighting the need for wide-ranging sector-focused policy packages⬇️
Deep Decarbonization Pathways for national development consistent with carbon neutrality
Browse all journals
www.tandfonline.com
April 9, 2026 at 3:49 PM
Who says you cannot do biodiversity, ecological restoration, carbon dioxide removal and plan for national defence all at once? 🙃 #afolu #cdr
A Finnish government study, to be published in May, will outline a plan to “build” a “Verdant Wall” along #Finland’s Eastern border by #rewilding and restoring natural habitats, especially marshlands, as barriers to invasion. Win win win!

#biodiversity #defence
Itä-Suomen luonnosta halutaan Venäjää vastaan vihreä muuri – laajoja suunnitelmia vireillä
Itärajan seudun luonnon ennallistamista edistetään ensimmäistä kertaa ministeriötasolla.
www.mtvuutiset.fi
March 8, 2026 at 7:49 PM
#AFOLU. Again, systematic drying in a forest turning it into a source of GHGs instead of a sink. This time Australian tropicals, not boreal, however.
This research paper is the first time that a tipping point of a switch from a carbon sink to a carbon emission source in tropical rainforests has been identified clearly – not just for one year but for the last 20 years. Cause is a change in the local climate. www.theguardian.com/environment/...
Australian tropical rainforest trees switch in world first from carbon sink to emissions source
Researchers say carbon emissions change in Queensland tropical rainforests may have global climate implications
www.theguardian.com
February 3, 2026 at 11:17 PM
It’s research & ideas like this that give me hope - instead of using science to deplete the planet we can use it to speed forest recovery & CO2 removal immediately & cheaply in anticipation of reaching net zero and net negative GHG emissions #AFOLU phys.org/news/2026-01...
Recovering tropical forests grow back nearly twice as fast with nitrogen
Young tropical forests play a crucial role in slowing climate change. Growing trees absorb carbon dioxide from the air, using photosynthesis to build it into their roots, trunks, and branches, where t...
phys.org
January 15, 2026 at 9:21 AM
I vote we leave any trees that can grow alone and smash up mountains of olivine in deserts instead, e.g., in Saudi Arabia. #AFOLU #CDR 🙃
I’d wondered about burying trees to lock away carbon and assumed it’d be too slow but here’s a proposal to sink them in the Arctic Ocean (via @newscientist.com):
www.nature.com/articles/s44...
January 12, 2026 at 8:24 AM
The Deep Decarbonization Pathways initiative is in process of completing a special issue in @climate-policy.bsky.social on the implications of neutrality & net negative emissions for bottom-up pathways for developing countries, including pprs on AFOLU, transport, power & industry @iddri.bsky.social
⚡ Deep decarbonisation of the power sector is essential for the #netzero transition, & will require substantial financial support, market reforms, capacity building, technological innovation & more, analyse Vishwanathan, @chrisbataille.bsky.social et al. in study on 🇧🇷 🇮🇳 🇮🇩 🇿🇦 ⬇️
Towards net-zero electricity sector in emerging economies – Brazil, India, Indonesia and South Africa
www.tandfonline.com
September 14, 2025 at 8:12 PM
So we have serious long run problem with the boreal drying and catching fire as #climatechange progresses, compounding our emissions. Here’s a simple yet radical way to keep it wetter - let beavers take the land back as habitat. #AFOLU #LULUCF #cdnpoli
May 19, 2025 at 6:31 AM
Here’s a new potential #AFOLU impact to boggle over - overwintering fires in upland forest and peat in NWT/Alaska, and by implication across northern Russia.
March 25, 2025 at 9:23 AM
An #AFOLU/#LULUCF Q. Is there a field which looks at the broad tradeoffs between: hydrology; forestry we should & shouldn't do & how; what farm lands should be left to regrow or be intensively farmed; & how cities & infrastructure should be planned in context of the above?@hishamzerriffi.bsky.social
February 14, 2024 at 5:26 PM
Under CPRG, any state or MSA that took planning funds had to develop a full GHG inventory as part of their plan. EPA wasn't proscriptive of the methodology, it just had to include every sector, including AFOLU
April 4, 2026 at 8:44 PM
Verra is testing new ways to handle risks in AFOLU and GCS projects under the VCS Program. Projects can now use insurance or fund-based approaches instead of a pooled buffer, lowering costs and boosting VCU demand. Learn more: bit.ly/4s268sD #CarbonMarkets #ClimateAction
December 18, 2025 at 4:44 PM
4.1 GtCO2-eq/yr. Cost-effective mitigation from soil carbon management + agroforestry at <$100/tCO2-eq.

Second-largest AFOLU mitigation category. IPCC AR6 WGIII Ch. 7.

Existing practices. Known economics. The deployment gap is institutional, not scientific.
March 27, 2026 at 7:00 AM
🌍 From mangroves to models, forest climate fixes are booming—but can the data keep up? New tools, big gaps, and open questions. 🌱🛰️

#australia #taishan #Tłı̨chǫ #ClimateData #CarbonMarkets #NatureBasedSolutions

groundtruth.app/afolu-option...
AFOLU Options, Global Gaps & Country-Level Clarity
From saplings to satellites: global snapshots of land-use climate fixes, data gaps, and carbon claims that don’t add up.
groundtruth.app
July 12, 2025 at 5:45 PM
CDR, (det gula fältet på bilden, hämtad från IPCC SR 1.5 2018), är väldefinierad i alla pathways som sammanställts av klimatforskarna för att nå Parisavtalet. Minskade GHG-emissioner är absolut störst och viktigast, men det räcker inte. Därför även AFOLU och CDR. IPCC promotar inte greenwashing.
November 25, 2024 at 8:13 AM
36 miljarder är den totala budgeten under 20 år, som kan jämföras med en exportpotential på tot ~60 miljarder/år.
De skogsåtgärder du föreslår ingår i AFOLU (jordbruksmetoder + reforestration), och kan således inte genomföras ”istället”. Minskade utsläpp är viktigast, CDR + AFOLU kompletterar.
November 24, 2024 at 10:06 PM
Om det finns billigare och samtidigt minst lika permanenta åtgärder så ska de så klart prioriteras. Så Viktor: vilka avser du?
…dvs för att hantera den residual som återstår efter minskade utsläpp (lejonparten) och förändrad markanvändning (AFOLU)’
November 24, 2024 at 9:57 PM
I modellerna för att bliv av med antropogena 50 miljarder CO2-ekvivalenter/år ligger minskningar, (beteende + teknik), om jag minns rätt på typ 85 %. Resten är AFOLU + CDR.
CDR är ju den del som dels hanterar svårreducerad residual och dels möjliggör amortering på vår GHG-skuld.
November 17, 2024 at 11:46 AM
Enligt alla modeller/pathways för att nå Parismålen inkluderas såväl AFOLU som CDR, som komplement till det centrala: att minska GHG-utsläppen. Vad i modellerna borde Axelsson bestrida?
November 17, 2024 at 9:00 AM