→ SSP5-8.5, the very-high-emissions scenario, has become implausible.
That's a reasonable update. But it's being read as: high-end warming risk is off the table.
That doesn't follow, because it's a claim about just one link.
→ SSP5-8.5, the very-high-emissions scenario, has become implausible.
That's a reasonable update. But it's being read as: high-end warming risk is off the table.
That doesn't follow, because it's a claim about just one link.
✍️ Written by @zekehausfather.com
Read here: buff.ly/t2daZcD
✍️ Written by @zekehausfather.com
Read here: buff.ly/t2daZcD
The final version is now up on GMD - and there's some changes since the first draft. /THREAD/
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
The final version is now up on GMD - and there's some changes since the first draft. /THREAD/
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
Earth System Modeling has long relied on simulations driven by GHG concentrations. But this approach is outdated.
ESMs need to resolve human activity and its consquences.
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/17/...
Earth System Modeling has long relied on simulations driven by GHG concentrations. But this approach is outdated.
ESMs need to resolve human activity and its consquences.
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/17/...
CDDS-CMIP7-mappings — Definition and review of CDDS mappings for CMIP7
#indiedev #opensource
CDDS-CMIP7-mappings — Definition and review of CDDS mappings for CMIP7
#indiedev #opensource
CMIP7 ist das Projekt, SSP5-8.5 war ein einzelnes Szenario der Vorgängergeneration CMIP6. CMIP7 hat SSP5-8.5 nicht übernommen, weil es als nicht mehr plausibel gilt. Das neue oberste Szenario heißt High und liegt deutlich darunter.
CMIP7 ist das Projekt, SSP5-8.5 war ein einzelnes Szenario der Vorgängergeneration CMIP6. CMIP7 hat SSP5-8.5 nicht übernommen, weil es als nicht mehr plausibel gilt. Das neue oberste Szenario heißt High und liegt deutlich darunter.
The CMIP7 paper says SSP5-8.5 is implausible. Good.
But, alas, a 2°C world being a safe one is also looking implausible.
The CMIP7 paper says SSP5-8.5 is implausible. Good.
But, alas, a 2°C world being a safe one is also looking implausible.
dashboard.climate-ref.org
Still working out the kinks and focused on CMIP6, but will expand for CMIP7.
#CMIP2026
dashboard.climate-ref.org
Still working out the kinks and focused on CMIP6, but will expand for CMIP7.
#CMIP2026
@detlefvanvuuren.bsky.social et al. (2026)
No mention of CERESMIP, while it's crucial to compare models with the radiative flux changes in the real world.
@climateofgavin.bsky.social
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
@detlefvanvuuren.bsky.social et al. (2026)
No mention of CERESMIP, while it's crucial to compare models with the radiative flux changes in the real world.
@climateofgavin.bsky.social
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
📅 8 May 2025 | 10:00–11:30 AM (BST)
🔗 bit.ly/3GtCZDz
Bringing together those across the UK research community who are contributing —or planning to contribute—to CMIP7, particularly through Community MIPs.
📅 8 May 2025 | 10:00–11:30 AM (BST)
🔗 bit.ly/3GtCZDz
Bringing together those across the UK research community who are contributing —or planning to contribute—to CMIP7, particularly through Community MIPs.
Die Primärquelle ist das Fachpaper "The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7" in Geoscientific Model Development. Es beschreibt die sieben neuen Szenarien und erklärt, warum SSP5-8.5 nicht mehr als plausibler Standardpfad gilt.
Die Primärquelle ist das Fachpaper "The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP7" in Geoscientific Model Development. Es beschreibt die sieben neuen Szenarien und erklärt, warum SSP5-8.5 nicht mehr als plausibler Standardpfad gilt.
✍️ written by Beth Dingley, Helene Hewitt, John Dunne and Eleanor O'Rourke
Read here ⬇️
✍️ written by Beth Dingley, Helene Hewitt, John Dunne and Eleanor O'Rourke
Read here ⬇️
drtomharris.substack.com/p/the-carbon...
#climatechange #CMIP7 #emissions #CDR #SRM #IPCC
drtomharris.substack.com/p/the-carbon...
#climatechange #CMIP7 #emissions #CDR #SRM #IPCC
Nicht der IPCC streicht also („heimlich“) ein Szenario. Im wissenschaftlichen CMIP7-Prozess wurde ein neues Szenario-Set entwickelt, das künftige Klimamodellierungen prägt. Eine bedeutende Änderung, aber ein regulärer Aktualisierungsschritt, keine Widerlegung der Klimaforschung.
Nicht der IPCC streicht also („heimlich“) ein Szenario. Im wissenschaftlichen CMIP7-Prozess wurde ein neues Szenario-Set entwickelt, das künftige Klimamodellierungen prägt. Eine bedeutende Änderung, aber ein regulärer Aktualisierungsschritt, keine Widerlegung der Klimaforschung.
We already knew this but… Major reductions in global GHG emissions are required SOON to avoid surpassing 2C of (average) global warming. The paper also proposes that RCP8.5 emissions levels are implausible
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
We already knew this but… Major reductions in global GHG emissions are required SOON to avoid surpassing 2C of (average) global warming. The paper also proposes that RCP8.5 emissions levels are implausible
gmd.copernicus.org/articles/19/...
This changed the whole story for me completely.
Nothing got better for humanity as the projection still ends in „Game Over“ for our current game with passing 5°C.
In CMIP6 as well as in CMIP7.
This changed the whole story for me completely.
Nothing got better for humanity as the projection still ends in „Game Over“ for our current game with passing 5°C.
In CMIP6 as well as in CMIP7.