Minnesota could receive $214 million to $307 million from a Meta settlement over alleged harm to children, with lawmakers weighing youth mental health and other funding priorities.

Together, Alone: How a Generation Lost the Art of Connection [Minett, Val] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Together, Alone: How a Generation Lost the Art of Connection

Together, Alone: How a Generation Lost the Art of Connection [Minett, Val] on Amazon.com. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. Together, Alone: How a Generation Lost the Art of Connection

Meta just agreed to an $18 billion settlement over addictive design. Is this a genuine reform or just the cost of doing business? Meta's $18 billion settleme...

It's satisfying to watch a company you don't trust get punished. When Meta settled with 52 state attorneys general last month over child safety, a lot of people who care about kids online felt somethi...

Meta's $18 billion settlement explained: why the biggest social-media lawsuit of the decade is about far more than money. The real legal question is whether ...

Meta’s settlement and the challenges of modern-day parenting

Federal Programs Weekly Brief — Issue 19 — August 24–30, 2026 Indiana K–12 Federal Program Administrators Issue 19 Federal ProgramsWeekly Brief Curated intelligence for district federal program leads ...

Meta's $18 billion child safety settlement marks a historic turning point for social media accountability. Find out what this means. Read the ...

The Meta consent judgment copies the 1998 tobacco settlement almost clause for clause. That precedent is instructive, and not in the way the states may intend.

The Meta consent judgment copies the 1998 tobacco settlement almost clause for clause. That precedent is instructive, and not in the way the states may intend.

The article discusses the implications of Meta's $18bn settlement with 29 US states over allegations of addictive product design, while highlighting ongoing legal battles in countries like Kenya and the Netherlands. It explores how the settlement's restrictions on minors' platform usage may not address systemic issues, such as Meta's algorithmic amplification of harmful content. The case of Abrham Meareg, whose father was allegedly targeted by Facebook's algorithm during Ethiopia's civil war, underscores concerns about the company's global influence. While the US settlement marks a victory for regulators, the article questions whether courts outside the US can effectively hold Meta accountable. It also notes Meta's resistance to international regulations, including its recent evasion of a Rohingya refugee lawsuit. The piece emphasizes the need for global oversight of algorithms that shape political discourse and democratic processes, despite Meta's efforts to limit regulatory impact through legal strategies and political alliances.

A coalition of attorneys general were suing the social media giant, alleging that Facebook and Instagram officials built their apps to be addictive and still told parents they are safe for teens.

Meta and state attorneys general settled a federal trial centering on allegations that company misrepresented the extent of child-related mental health harms.