YouTube video by David Pakman Show

Despite their misleading marketing, TeleMessage, the company that makes a modified version of Signal used by senior Trump officials, can access plaintext chat logs from its customers. In this post I ...

#DigitalID #Blair #larryellison #NHS #surveillance #privacyviolations

regulations for the use of personal data read more about South Korea Suspends DeepSeek AI Downloads Over Privacy Violations

Donald Trump's aides are fully supportive of Elon Musk's efforts to drastically cut government spending, but his decisions have generated some stress because he often moves forward without giving the ...

TikTok video by raisingup

A Tyee exclusive: Coastal GasLink intel was shared with the Indigenous Relations Ministry during high-stakes talks.

during a private discussion read more about Apple to Pay Siri Users $20 Per Device in Settlement Over Accidental Siri Privacy Violations

By Tom Hals WILMINGTON, Delaware (Reuters) -Mark Zuckerberg is expected to appear as a star witness in an unusual $8 billion trial that kicks off this week at which the Meta CEO is accused of operating Facebook as an illegal enterprise that allowed users’ data to be harvested without their consent. Shareholders of Meta Platforms (NASDAQ:META), the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, sued Zuckerberg and other current and former company leaders, saying they continually violated a 2012 agreement between Facebook and the Federal Trade Commission to protect users’ data. The case dates back to 2018, after it emerged that data from millions of Facebook users was accessed by Cambridge Analytica, a now-defunct political consulting firm that worked for Donald Trump’s successful campaign for U.S. president in 2016. Shareholders want Zuckerberg and the other defendants to reimburse the company for more than $8 billion in fines and other costs paid by Meta after the Cambridge Analytica scandal came to light, including a record $5 billion fine imposed on Facebook by the FTC in 2019 for violating the 2012 agreement. Defendants in the case include former Chief Operating Officer Sheryl Sandberg, venture capitalist and board member Marc Andreessen, as well as former board members Peter Thiel, the Palantir Technologies (NASDAQ:PLTR) co-founder, and Reed Hastings, the co-founder of Netflix (NASDAQ:NFLX). Zuckerberg and the other defendants, who declined to comment, have dismissed the allegations in court filings as "extreme claims." Meta, which is not a defendant, also declined to comment. The non-jury trial in Wilmington, Delaware, is scheduled to last eight days. It will mostly focus on decade-old events and board meetings to determine how Facebook leaders implemented the 2012 agreement. While the trial will cover long-ago policies, it comes as privacy concerns continue to dog Meta, which is under scrutiny for its training of AI models. The company says it has invested billions of dollars since 2019 in its program to safeguard users’ privacy. Jason Kint, the head of Digital Content Next, a trade group for content providers, said the case will fill in details about what the board knew - and when - regarding the data of users, who now total more than 3 billion daily across Meta’s platforms. "There’s an argument we can’t avoid Facebook and Instagram in our lives," he said. "Can we trust Mark Zuckerberg?" MOST DIFFICULT CLAIMS Two years ago, the defendants sought to dismiss the case before trial, which the judge declined. "This is a case involving alleged wrongdoing on a truly colossal scale," said Travis Laster, the judge handling the case at the time. The trial in the Court of Chancery will be overseen by Kathaleen McCormick (NYSE:MKC). Now the plaintiffs, individual investors and union pension funds including California’s State Teachers’ Retirement System, must prove what is often described as the most difficult claim in corporate law - showing that directors utterly failed in their duty of oversight. Legal experts said it appears to be the first trial on such a claim. Zuckerberg and Sandberg are alleged to have knowingly caused the company to violate the law. While Delaware law protects directors and officers for bad business decisions, it does not protect them from illegal ones, even if they are profitable. Defendants said in court filings that plaintiffs cannot deliver the evidence. The shareholders in pretrial court papers said they can prove that after the 2012 agreement, Facebook continued deceptive privacy practices, at the direction of Zuckerberg. The defendants said the evidence will show that the company built a team to oversee privacy and hired an outside compliance firm and that Facebook was a victim of Cambridge Analytica’s "studied deceit." In addition to the central privacy claims, plaintiffs also allege that when Zuckerberg could see that the Cambridge Analytica scandal was about break and send company stock lower, he was motivated to offload his stock and reaped at least $1 billion in profit. Defendants said evidence will show he used a stock-trading plan that can protect against insider-trading allegations. They also said the motivation was to benefit his charitable pursuits. With valuations skyrocketing in 2024, many investors are uneasy putting more money into stocks. Sure, there are always opportunities in the stock market – but finding them feels more difficult now than a year ago. Unsure where to invest next? One of the best ways to discover new high-potential opportunities is to look at the top performing portfolios this year. ProPicks AI offers 6 model portfolios from Investing.com which identify the best stocks for investors to buy right now. For example, ProPicks AI found 9 overlooked stocks that jumped over 25% this year alone. The new stocks that made the monthly cut could yield enormous returns in the coming years. Is MKC one of them?

Meta y Facebook, las empresas madre de Facebook, enfrentan denuncias por supuestas violaciones de la privacidad de los datos de sus usuarios. Según reportes, las autoridades de varios países han iniciado investigaciones sobre el uso indebido de información personal recopilada por las plataformas. Las denuncias abarcan acusaciones de falta de transparencia en la recopilación de datos, falta de consentimiento explícito para el uso de información sensible y posibles violaciones de normativas de protección de datos. Las empresas han respondido que están cooperando con las autoridades y que han implementado medidas para mejorar la seguridad y privacidad de los usuarios. Las denuncias reflejan crecientes preocupaciones sobre el uso de datos personales en el entorno digital y el impacto en la privacidad de los usuarios. Las autoridades están evaluando si se han cometido infracciones legales y qué acciones se deben tomar contra las empresas. Esta situación refleja la tensión entre el crecimiento de las tecnologías de datos y la protección de los derechos de los usuarios.

The report presented to Grant County commissioners cites IT logs showing thousands of camera-access events and dozens of audio activations; counsel warned some accesses could violate federal wiretap statutes and recommended preserving evidence and referring the matter to federal authorities.

A recent investigation reveals that employees of the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency have been misusing access to sensitive government databases, raising concerns about data privacy and internal oversight. The findings highlight how officials have exploited their access to personal information, including tracking coworkers' locations, searching for personal relationships, and sharing protected data. This misuse extends to the use of commercial tools like license plate readers and data brokers, which have been linked to surveillance practices that violate privacy norms. The issue has prompted calls for stricter regulations and transparency, as watchdog reports indicate the scale of data collection has grown significantly under recent administrations. The scandal underscores broader concerns about the privatization of surveillance technologies and the potential for abuse within government agencies. Advocacy groups warn that such practices could lead to systemic violations of civil liberties, emphasizing the need for accountability and reform in how sensitive data is managed and accessed by public officials.

The telehealth company, which had nearly 2.6 million subscribers as of March, has pushed back on the complaint.

YouTube video by Damon Cassidy

Archive of Truth in Exile: Where Legal Texts Hide Their Injustice - Fight Unjust Law Articles, Lawyers - Series 4, Episode 5

Archive of Truth in Exile: Witnessing the moment when justice looked away & the consequences refused to end - Series 4, Episode 2

Archive of Truth in Exile: How a Non‑Final Verdict Becomes a Weapon of Institutional Injustice? Series 4, Episode 1