Donald Trump keeps collecting awards. The question is what the people handing them out expect in return.

via ABC News: Top Stories — Both the Democratic and Republican parties are now leaning into presidential power amid early voting for the midterm elections.

via Home - CBSNews.com — Republican Sen. Thom Tillis, retiring soon, says without checks on power, U.S. democracy is at risk. He discusses his fears for the future of U.S. democracy and his relationship with President Trump.

____________________ On September 24, Rep. Steve Cohen of Tennessee filed 26 articles of impeachment against President Trump. The list runs from the Iran war to birthright citizenship, from fired i…

The Trump administration is leaning into national security arguments to remake parts of Washington in line with the president’s fancy and creating a buffer.

The article 'When War Comes Home: A Constitutional Warning' by Andrew P. Napolitano, published on September 10, 2026, examines the constitutional implications of military actions taken by the U.S. government, particularly focusing on the unauthorized war against Iran. The author argues that the conflict was unconstitutional, as it was initiated without congressional authorization, violating Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution which grants Congress the power to declare war. The piece highlights the dangers of presidential overreach, emphasizing that the president, while commander in chief, does not possess the authority to unilaterally declare war. The article references historical precedents, such as the Supreme Court case Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, which established that executive power is most dangerous when it operates in a 'zone of twilight' without congressional consent. Napolitano warns that military failures abroad can lead to domestic overreach, where a president frustrated by lack of success overseas may seek to demonstrate strength through radical domestic policies, such as excessive immigration enforcement, prohibited tariffs, or the misuse of military forces for law enforcement. The author stresses that the Constitution's separation of powers, judicial review, and due process protections are not obstacles to effective governance but safeguards against government becoming the threat it was created to prevent. The article concludes by emphasizing that the ultimate question is not whether a president is strong enough to exercise power, but whether they are restrained enough to obey the laws they have sworn to uphold. This constitutional warning serves as a reminder of the importance of adhering to the rule of law, even in times of perceived crisis.

President Donald Trump made a remark during a Rose Garden event where he joked about banning fishing and potentially driving Bass Pro Shops founder Johnny Morris out of business. The president, who had just signed two executive orders easing hunting and fishing restrictions, stated, 'I could have banned fishing and driven Johnny right the hell out of business.' Experts in political science and law immediately pointed out that Trump does not have the legal authority to ban fishing nationwide, but they emphasized that his comments reflect a concerning attitude toward presidential power. Ilya Somin, a law professor at George Mason University, noted there is 'no plausible basis' for such a ban, yet the statement reveals Trump's belief that he can act without limits. Kate Shaw, a law professor at the University of Pennsylvania, warned that dismissing such remarks as mere jokes could normalize the idea that presidential power has no boundaries. Brendan Nyhan, a Dartmouth College government professor, described Trump's 'jokes' as a 'great trick' to deflect criticism while normalizing extreme executive actions. The White House defended Trump's comment as a lighthearted remark, with spokesperson Taylor Rogers stating the president is 'known and loved for his personable and funny remarks.' However, experts argue that Trump's pattern of making such statements—like his earlier comment about not having elections—should be taken seriously. Somin highlighted that Trump's actual actions, such as imposing tariffs, declaring potential invasions, and starting wars without congressional approval, are more significant than his jokes. The article also notes that the fishing industry generates approximately $319 billion annually, according to NOAA Fisheries Economics data, making the potential impact of such a ban substantial. Experts stress that while the joke itself is not legally binding, the underlying message about unchecked presidential authority is a matter of serious concern for democratic norms.

ALT: Protest Freedom

LP-150 PUTIN’S FIFTH TERM: WHY PRESIDENTIAL POWER MUST REMAIN ACCOUNTABLE TO THE RUSSIAN PEOPLE — PUBLIC TRUST & ACCOUNTABILITY IN RUSSIA

Discover how the unitary executive theory reshapes presidential authority and executive branch control. Learn the constitutional foundations and modern applications. #ConstitutionalLaw #PresidentialPower #ExecutiveBranch

The Supreme Court recently issued two rulings, Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook, that redefine presidential authority over independent agencies. While one affirmed presidential power over some agencies, the other protected the Federal Reserve's autonomy, raising questions about democratic accountability in policymaking.

Judges find limits to presidential power under emergency economic law, markets react positively to decision on trade measures

Judges find limits to presidential power under emergency economic law, markets react positively to decision on trade measures