#TextualCriticism
📅 Mercredi 1er octobre, 10h : première séance de l’atelier de #philologie et de critique textuelle, coorganisé chaque mois par Elisa Lonati, post-doctorante à l’École, au @campuscondorcet.bsky.social. Consulter le programme des séances et s’inscrire ➡ https://lc.cx/Sx0Q2L
@irht-cnrs.bsky.social
September 30, 2025 at 5:29 PM
NT Pod Short: Is Textual Criticism Interesting? www.youtube.com/shorts/DWzga... #NTPod #NTPodShorts
Is Textual Criticism Interesting? #ntpodshorts #newtestament #textualcriticism
YouTube video by Mark Goodacre
www.youtube.com
January 17, 2026 at 2:29 PM
Classical philology in his time wasn't just quiet library work—scholars fought over every word, since one misread line could twist a whole ancient author. #latinliterature #textualcriticism #romanempire
September 24, 2026 at 9:08 AM
Bookings are open for Textual Criticism and the Transmission of Texts.

Learn how to build a critical edition and a stemma codicum, step by step, with Dr Anna Somfai.

Thursdays 2-4pm, 16 April-7 May 2026.

Book: warburg.sas.ac.uk/news-events/...

#TextualCriticism #MedievalStudies
Textual Criticism and the Transmission of Texts - 2026
Please enable JavaScript in your web browser to get the best experience.
warburg.sas.ac.uk
December 22, 2025 at 11:28 AM
Coming soon! Piers Plowman: A New Annotated Edition of the A-text by William Langland, edited by Eric Weiskott 📖

Learn more and preorder your copy ➡️ https://tinyurl.com/munxshrs

#williamlangland #piersplowman #alliterativeverse #dreamvision #textualcriticism
July 18, 2025 at 9:16 AM
Calling all #Vulgate, #textualcriticism, #patristics, #biblicalscholarship, #manuscript peeps: late last night I started musing on colometry in Vulgate MSS, as one does on a Saturday night, and I buried it deep in a thread. Any recs on literature on this, new or old?
Hypothesis: per cola et commata is a style of layout, but it is not a transmitted apparatus to the text—unlike, say, Eusebian section numbers. Scribes can make their own decisions about which phrases and clauses get a new line and an outdent. Or at least that's my impression.
June 1, 2025 at 11:19 PM
Are you researching the Bible—or challenging how we read it? Studies of Biblical Interest is open for submissions across:

#BiblicalStudies & #Archaeology
#TextualCriticism & #ComparativeReligion
#Etymology and Global #SacredTexts
Plus: opinion, photography, art & more

Submit at biblicaljournal.org
July 24, 2025 at 5:30 PM
Book Review: Misquoting Jesus by Dr Bart Ehrman reveals how the New Testament was altered over centuries by scribes—sometimes accidentally, sometimes deliberately. Challenging the idea of Biblical inerrancy by showing the human hands behind the texts. #TextualCriticism #BartEhrman #MisquotingJesus
June 19, 2025 at 6:07 PM
August 14, 2025 at 7:35 AM
I have a draft #HebrewBible #TextualCriticism article that I would like to submit to a journal. Any Hebrew Bible scholars want to read a draft and give me feedback?
June 27, 2026 at 5:41 AM
Thank you @joeymccollum.bsky.social We also really enjoyed your video about the CBGM here www.youtube.com/watch?v=viQs...
The NEWEST method of NEW TESTAMENT textual criticism: CBGM with Joey McCollum. #TextualCriticism
YouTube video by Dwayne Green
www.youtube.com
May 5, 2026 at 5:05 PM
The Vulgate and the Masoretic Text agree, but the Samaritan Pentateuch, the Septuagint, and the Peshitta all disagree on the totals. Pesh nearly agrees, only rounding up Lamech's age at procreation to a round 200 (why?). But SamP and LXX are more interesting.
2/
#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
February 13, 2026 at 8:00 AM
I read a chapter about #HebrewBible #TextualCriticism in the 19th C, and now I better understand the background between the separation of textual criticism starting where literary criticism ends, which I see in the work e.g. of Tov, but I still think the division is artificial and misleading.
March 30, 2026 at 1:29 AM
#Deuteronomy 12 famously refers to a place YHWH will choose for his cult, which scholars often take as referring to Josiah's reforms (2 Kings 23). But in Deuteronomy the verbs are future tense (יבחר).

Or are they? SamP thinks otherwise.

#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
1/?
December 22, 2024 at 9:07 PM
#2Samuel 20:25 names David's scribe, but every witness spells the name differently:
MT-K שיא
MT-Q שְׁוָ֖א
OG Σουσὰ
Pesh ܫܪܝܐ
Vulg Siva

#1Kings 4:3 names Solomon's scribes' father slightly more consistently:
MT שִׁישָׁ֖א
OG Σαβὰ
Pesh ܫܝܫܐ
Vulg Sisa

Could this be the same name?
#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
May 7, 2026 at 2:52 AM
Spend 15 minutes with Dan Wallace and learn more than you ever dreamed about #NewTestament #TextualCriticism, and why it matters. Yes it really does matter!!

youtu.be/zBgReAy0yl4?...

#Bible #BibleTranslation #NewTestamentManuscripts #CSNTM
A Day in a Bible Translator's Library: Hang with a Bible scholar
YouTube video by How to Faith A Life
youtu.be
March 3, 2025 at 3:14 PM
I know that the presence or absence of matres lectionis (vocalic waw or yod) isn't meaningful, semantically or textually.

Yet often a verse differs in SamP and MT in that SamP has a mater lectionis in one word where MT lacks it, and MT has one where SamP lacks it.
1/?
#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
November 29, 2024 at 4:22 AM
In #1Samuel 20:2, there's an interesting ketiv/qere:
K: לו־עשה
Q: לֹֽא־יַעֲשֶׂ֨ה

Hyphens & vowels were added later & word spacing is unreliable in ancient Hebrew manuscripts, so I wonder if there has been a w/y interchange here, and earlier it read ליעשה with negative L-.

#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
October 13, 2024 at 5:58 PM
We must use critical editions critically. I noticed that Von Gall's edition of #Exodus 27:9 reads באתה where MT reads בָֽאַמָּה֙, despite the fact that Kennicott's edition (which favors readings where SamP≠MT) does not note it. Is this a real variant, or just a typo?
1/2
#HebrewBible #TextualCriticism
October 18, 2024 at 3:55 AM
.@CSLewis wasn’t talking about #textualcriticism. But his thoughts on the value of reading old books definitely apply. https://www.jdavidstark.com/what-do-you-do-when-your-critical-apparatus-is-confusing/ @INTF_MS @eerdmansbooks
September 8, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Some reasons for thinking Rom 15–16 are original to the letter: https://www.jdavidstark.com/the-textual-originality-of-romans-15-16-additional-evidence/ #textualcriticism @eerdmansbooks @ZonderAcademic @hendricksonpub @twitterivp
August 28, 2026 at 12:29 PM
Some objections to Rom 15–16 as part of the letter’s initial text. https://www.jdavidstark.com/the-textual-originality-of-romans-15-16-objections/ #textualcriticism @oxunipress @bakeracademic @wjkbooks
August 7, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Is #textualcriticism important for #spiritualformation? Irenaeus thought so, e.g., in his treatment of the variation between 616 and 666 in Rev 13. https://www.jdavidstark.com/irenaeus-on-666-and-616/
August 5, 2026 at 1:09 AM
In years gone by, there have been some objections to Rom 15–16 as part of the letter’s initial text. https://www.jdavidstark.com/the-textual-originality-of-romans-15-16-objections/ #textualcriticism @oxunipress @bakeracademic @wjkbooks
July 8, 2026 at 2:14 PM