Regular meat consumption is associated with a range of diseases that researchers had not previously considered, according to a large, population-level study conducted by a team at the University of

A new analysis from Italian cohort studies found that consuming over 300 g of poultry per week is linked to significantly increased risk of death from gastrointestinal cancers, especially in men. Mode...

Public health campaigns and dietary guidelines urge us to eat less meat and include more legumes. But what does ‘less’ really mean? Researchers from DTU now offer a clear answer. 255 grams (9 ounces)...

A recent article explores the link between traditional ideas of masculinity and high meat consumption among Australian men, and how this affects efforts to tackle the climate crisis. Research shows men eat significantly more meat than women, even after adjusting for energy needs. This pattern contributes to higher carbon emissions, as livestock is a major source of methane in Australia’s agriculture sector, which makes up nearly a fifth of national emissions. The piece highlights health risks too, including heart disease from saturated fats, and links between processed and red meat with certain cancers. Dietary guidelines recommend limiting meat intake, yet many blokes exceed this, with over half of meat-eating men consuming at least 198 grams daily. Experts like social psychologist Lauren Camilleri note cultural stereotypes where meat symbolises strength and manhood, making men more resistant to plant-based or reduced-meat diets. However, small changes are encouraged rather than strict vegetarianism. The EAT-Lancet Planetary Health Diet suggests modest portions of meat as an occasional treat, focusing instead on vegetables, grains, and legumes. Health professionals advocate for flexible approaches that align with personal priorities. High-profile athletes following plant-heavy diets are helping shift perceptions. Overall, the article stresses that addressing outdated myths and making gradual swaps, like moving from red meat to poultry or fish, can benefit both personal health and the environment without requiring drastic overhauls. Small, consistent actions by men could play a key role in reducing Australia’s carbon footprint.

YouTube video by Novara Media

Brazilian ranchers in Pará and Rondônia say JBS can not achieve stated goal of deforestation-free cattle

Academic experts also criticise UN Food and Agriculture Organization for dismissing alternative proteins

Research shows that livestock production and the consumption of meat significantly affect planetary and human health.

This research protocol systematically reviews existing studies on red and processed meat consumption and cancer risk, assessing their credibility and consistency to provide a clearer understanding of ...

Study reveals that consuming processed meat, unprocessed red meat, and poultry increases the risk of developing type 2 diabetes over a 10-year period across various global populations.